라오스인 한국어 학습자의 한국어 공손표현 연구
A Study on Laotian KSL Learner's Linguistic Politeness Focusing on Pragmatic Transfer
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes Laotian KSL(Korean as Second Language) learners' linguistic ability in performing polite expressions from a cross-cultural perspective. Its finding highlights cases both in pragmatic transfer and failure caused by Laotian linguistic cultural factors. To demonstrate this, this research adopts a written Discourse Completion Test(DCT), To investigate the degrees of imposition for each situation, subjects are requested to mark their responses in a five-point Likert Scale. Finally, it conducted follow-up interviews to carry out an in-depth analysis as a qualitative research. The findings could be summarized as follow: The Laotian KSL learners tend to use avoidance strategy when they encounter a 'Face' threatening situations. In unavoidable circumstances, they use several strategies to reduce the risk of Face Threatening Act(FTA). Firstly, they use endings with honorific expressions such as '-haeyo' not only for superiors but also for friends; Secondly, they use apologetic expressions; Thirdly, the terms of address are used as a politeness marker; and Finally, they try to make literal translation from the Laotian language. Meanwhile, Laotian KSL learners often cause pragmatic failures when they use direct and conclusive utterances because of their lack of linguistic resources. Its result would provide good references to develop teaching materials, particularly focusing on politeness expressions, which help Laotians learn Korean language and culture together.
Abstract
This study analyzes Laotian KSL(Korean as Second Language) learners' linguistic ability in performing polite expressions from a cross-cultural perspective. Its finding highlights cases both in pragmatic transfer and failure caused by Laotian linguistic cultural factors. To demonstrate this, this research adopts a written Discourse Completion Test(DCT), To investigate the degrees of imposition for each situation, subjects are requested to mark their responses in a five-point Likert Scale. Finally, it conducted follow-up interviews to carry out an in-depth analysis as a qualitative research. The findings could be summarized as follow: The Laotian KSL learners tend to use avoidance strategy when they encounter a 'Face' threatening situations. In unavoidable circumstances, they use several strategies to reduce the risk of Face Threatening Act(FTA). Firstly, they use endings with honorific expressions such as '-haeyo' not only for superiors but also for friends; Secondly, they use apologetic expressions; Thirdly, the terms of address are used as a politeness marker; and Finally, they try to make literal translation from the Laotian language. Meanwhile, Laotian KSL learners often cause pragmatic failures when they use direct and conclusive utterances because of their lack of linguistic resources. Its result would provide good references to develop teaching materials, particularly focusing on politeness expressions, which help Laotians learn Korean language and culture together.
참고문헌 (27)
- 고륙양, "한·중 호칭어의 대조 연구 : 사회언어학적 방법론" (2007), 박이정
- 김명운, "현대국어의 공손성 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2009
- 김수은, "라오스인 한국어 학습자의 공손표현 수행양상 연구 : 비교문화 화용론의 관점에서", 석사, 한국학과, pp.2013
- 金禧淑, "現代國語의 恭遜表現 연구 : 敬語法과 關聯지어", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1991
- 백경숙, "영어교육을 위한 화용론", pp.161~210 (2011), 한국문화사
- 쁘라주업 인센, "한국어와 태국어의 대우 표현에 관한 대조적 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2005
- 송경숙, "담화 화용론" (2008), 한국문화사
- 와와메인, "한국어와 미얀마어 공손표현 대조 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
- 왕한석, "한국사회와 호칭어" (2005), 역락
- 윤은미, "한국인과 영어권 한국어 학습자의 거절화행 비교 연구 : 체면과 공손성을 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2004
- 이선명, "중국인 한국어 학습자의 화용 능력 발달 연구 : 요청 화행 실현 전략을 중심으로", 석사, 한국어교육, pp.2009
- 이해영, "비교문화적 화용론에 기초한 한국어의 화용 교육", 이중언어학, 21(21), pp.45~70 (2002), 이중언어학회
- 이해영, "일본인 한국어 고급 학습자의 거절 화행 실현 양상 연구", 한국어교육, 14(2), pp.11~326 (2003), 국제한국어교육학회
- 이해영, "한국어 교육에서의 대우 표현 연구", 國語學, (47), pp.509~527 (2006), 국어학회
- 전혜영, "한국어 공손표현의 의미", 한국어 의미학, 15, pp.71~91 (2004), 한국어의미학회
- 조준학, "영어와 국어의 honorifics 비교서설", 영어영문학, 72, pp.325~240 (1979), 한국 영어영문학회
- 조준학, "화용론과 공손의 규칙", 어학연구, 16(1), pp.11~ (1980), 서울대 어학연구소
- 구현정, "담화 맥락에서의 조건 표지: 조건에서 공손으로", 담화와 인지, 12(2), pp.1~22 (2005), 담화·인지언어학회
- Brown & Levinson, "Politeness : some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Gass, S.M., "제2언어습득론" (1999), 한신문화사
- Hill. B, "Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American English", Journal of pragmatics, 10, pp.347~371 (1986)
- Hudson. T., "Developing prototypic measures of cross-cultural pragmatics" (1992), University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center
- Hwang, J., "Role of Sociolinguistics in Foreign Language Education with Reference to Korean and English Terms of Address and Levels of Deference", Ph.D, pp.1975
- Lakoff, R., "Language in Context", Language, 48(4), pp.907~927 (1972)
- Matsumoto. Y., "Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese", Journal of pragmatics, 12, pp.403~426 (1988)
- Onuigbo G., "Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face", Journal of pragmatics, 18, pp.309~328 (1992)
- Thomas. J., "Cross-cultural pragmatic failure", Applied linguistics, 4(2), pp.91~112 (1983)