본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Cross-cultural and Acquisitional Aspects of Interlanguage Pragmatics

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study aims to examine the characteristics and the source of Korean English L2 learners’interlangauge pragmatics focusing on request. Based upon nine request strategy types that reflected various contexts according to the social distance and dominance, 48 advanced level of Korean English L2 learners and 14native speakers of English were required to answer 18 English elicitation items in Discourse Completion Test (DCT, Blum-Kulka & Olshtain, 1984). Subsequently, Korean English L2 learners performed Korean DCT. The findings presented that Korean English L2 learners were not hindered by their L2 grammatical competence and produced as many sentences as native English speakers did. However, there were some aspects that they showed conspicuous differences from their counter group. By and large, the Korean group overused direct and explicit request strategies regardless of the formality of the context and preferred suggestion formulas which native speakers of English did not really put to use. In addition, it was noteworthy that these differences were based upon their L1 pragmatics. Therefore, the present study asserts that L1 pragmatics transferability can be a critical factor in the development and acquisition of interlangauge pragmatics.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the characteristics and the source of Korean English L2 learners’interlangauge pragmatics focusing on request. Based upon nine request strategy types that reflected various contexts according to the social distance and dominance, 48 advanced level of Korean English L2 learners and 14native speakers of English were required to answer 18 English elicitation items in Discourse Completion Test (DCT, Blum-Kulka & Olshtain, 1984). Subsequently, Korean English L2 learners performed Korean DCT. The findings presented that Korean English L2 learners were not hindered by their L2 grammatical competence and produced as many sentences as native English speakers did. However, there were some aspects that they showed conspicuous differences from their counter group. By and large, the Korean group overused direct and explicit request strategies regardless of the formality of the context and preferred suggestion formulas which native speakers of English did not really put to use. In addition, it was noteworthy that these differences were based upon their L1 pragmatics. Therefore, the present study asserts that L1 pragmatics transferability can be a critical factor in the development and acquisition of interlangauge pragmatics.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Achiba, Machiko, "Learning to request in a second language: A study of child interlanguage" (2003), Multiligual Matters
  2. Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen, "Exploring the interlanguage pragmatics : A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics", Language Learning, 49(4), pp.677~713 (1999)
  3. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, "Learning to say what you mean in a second language : A study ofspeech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language", Applied Linguistics, 3, pp.29~59 (1982)
  4. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, "Requests and apologies : A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns(CCSARP)", Applied Linguistics, 5(3), pp.196~213 (1984)
  5. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, "Cross-Cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies" (1989), Ablex
  6. Carrell, Patricia, "Politeness : Comparing native and nonnative judgements", Language Learning, 31(1), pp.17~30 (1981)
  7. Cohen, Andrew, "Developing a measure of sociolinguistic competence : The case of apology", Language Learning, 31, pp.112~134 (1981)
  8. Cohen, Andrew, "The production of speech acts by EFL learners", TESOL Quarterly, 27, pp.33~56 (1993)
  9. Fasold, Ralph, "The sociolinguistics of language" (1990), Blackwell
  10. Fitch, Kristine, "Handbook of language and social interaction", Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Press
  11. Grundy, Peter, "Doing pragmatics" (2000), Arnold
  12. Haugh, Michael, "Interaction(ality)and the conceptualization of communication in pragmatics", Australian Journal of Linguistics, 29(1), pp.91~113 (2009)
  13. Jalilifar, Alireza, "Request strategies : Cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners and Australian native speakers", English Language Teaching, 2(1), pp.46~61 (2009)
  14. Kasper, Gabriele, "Pragmatic transfer", Second Language Research, 8, pp.203~231 (1992)
  15. Kasper, Gabriele, "Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, pp.215~247 (1991)
  16. Kasper, Gabriele, "Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, pp.149~169 (1996)
  17. Maeshiba, Naoko, "Transfer and proficiency in interlanguage apologizing, In Speech acts across cultures: Challenge to communication in a second language", pp.155~187 (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  18. Scarcella, Robin, "On speaking politely in a second language, In On TESOL ’79", TESOL, pp.275~287 (1979)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)