본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지정학 관점에서 본 림랜드 아세안(ASEAN)의 가치와 미․중 경쟁

Rimland ASEAN's Value and the US-China Competition from a Geopolitical Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

This article explains the US-China competition and Rimland ASEAN's value from a geopolitical perspective. First of all, the article focuses on realist theorists' pessimistic view in which they forecast an inevitable collision between the US, the maritime nation, and China, the nation who has been promoting maritime-centric policies when still being easily mistaken for a continental nation. The article is to take a closer look at the ASEAN's response to the US-China strategic competition, giving a brief review on how to answer following questions : "How much value indeed does ASEAN imply?" and "How does ASEAN deal with the US-China competition?" Before such a hard competition between the US and China, the direction of ASEAN's strategic foreign policy is rather clearly classified. Despite relative difference among its member states, the ASEAN as a whole tends to promote economic cooperation with China while maintaining a close relationship with the US in military sector. Nevertheless it makes continuous and eager efforts to cooperate with the two nations in a balanced manner in both economic and military sectors. In other words the ASEAN has recognized its inherent value and is effectively carrying out pragmatic foreign policy in a selective manner.

Abstract

This article explains the US-China competition and Rimland ASEAN's value from a geopolitical perspective. First of all, the article focuses on realist theorists' pessimistic view in which they forecast an inevitable collision between the US, the maritime nation, and China, the nation who has been promoting maritime-centric policies when still being easily mistaken for a continental nation. The article is to take a closer look at the ASEAN's response to the US-China strategic competition, giving a brief review on how to answer following questions : "How much value indeed does ASEAN imply?" and "How does ASEAN deal with the US-China competition?" Before such a hard competition between the US and China, the direction of ASEAN's strategic foreign policy is rather clearly classified. Despite relative difference among its member states, the ASEAN as a whole tends to promote economic cooperation with China while maintaining a close relationship with the US in military sector. Nevertheless it makes continuous and eager efforts to cooperate with the two nations in a balanced manner in both economic and military sectors. In other words the ASEAN has recognized its inherent value and is effectively carrying out pragmatic foreign policy in a selective manner.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. 구민교, "미중 간의 신 해양패권 경쟁: 해상교통로를 둘러싼 ‘점-선-면’ 경쟁을 중심으로", 국제.지역연구, 25(3), pp.37~65 (2016), 국제학연구소
  2. 김남권, "아세안, 美와 내달 첫 해상훈련…작년 中 합동훈련과‘균형’", 연합뉴스. 8월 22일, ~ (2019)
  3. 김재엽, "중국의 반(反)접근·지역거부 도전과 미국의 군사적 응전: 공해전투에서 다중영역전투까지", 한국군사학논집, 75(1), pp.125~154 (2019), 화랑대연구소[DOI]
  4. 김옥준, "중국의 일대일로(一帶一路)구상과 정치·경제적 함의: 실크로드 경제벨트 구축을 중심으로", 국제정치연구, 18(1), pp.289~308 (2015), 동아시아국제정치학회[DOI]
  5. 김현승, "중국 해양안보전략에 관한 분석 및 평가 : 아더라이케의 전략 분석틀을 중심으로", Strategy 21, 22(1), pp.33~59 (2019)
  6. 박성쾌, "해양과 육지의 통합 철학에 대한 제언", 계간 해양수산, 2, pp.30~32 (2011)
  7. 박현, "미국-중국 ‘군사 신뢰 구축’ 합의했지만…패권경쟁 속내 안 숨겨", 한겨레. 11월 12일, ~ (2014)
  8. 서정경, "지정학적 관점에서 본 시진핑 시기 중국 외교 : ‘일대일로(一帶一路)’ 전략을 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 55(2), pp.225~257 (2015), 한국국제정치학회
  9. 송용창, "미국의 동남아 잡기...中 무역전쟁에 이은 앞마당 견제", 한국일보. 7월 31일, ~ (2018)
  10. 신성호, "미국의 인도-태평양 전략과 한국의 대응", 한국군사학회지, 95, pp.9~26 (2018)
  11. 신성호, "미국의 아시아 올인정책", 전략연구, 19(55), pp.153~186 (2012), (사) 한국전략문제연구소[DOI]
  12. 안석, "아세안, G2 사이 ‘줄타기’ … 새달초 美와 첫 해상훈련", 서울신문. 8월 23일, ~ (2019)
  13. 이동률, "시진핑 정부 ‘해양강국’ 구상의 지경제학적 접근과 지정학적 딜레마", 국제정치논총, 57(2), pp.369~403 (2017), 한국국제정치학회
  14. 이상엽, "美 인도태평양전략의 국제정치학적 해석", Strategy 21, 22(1), pp.5~32 (2019)
  15. 이재현, "미 국방부 ‘인도-태평양 전략 보고서’(2019) 평가: 미국의 위협인식과 인도-태평양에서 한국의 자리", KIMS Periscope. 6월 21일, ~ (2019)
  16. 임경한, "Same Bed, Different Dreams: US-Chinese Power Competition Over the East Asian Seas", 아태연구, 21(1), pp.187~216 (2014), 국제지역연구원[DOI]
  17. 임경한, "일대일로와 인도-태평양 전략에 대한 인도와 호주의 대응", 동서연구, 30(4), pp.5~32 (2018), 동서문제연구원[DOI]
  18. 임경한, "중국의 일대일로 전략과 미국의 인도-태평양 전략 경쟁 하 주변국의 대응전략", 국제정치연구, 22(4), pp.81~107 (2019), 동아시아국제정치학회[DOI]
  19. 윤석준, "일대일로와 인도-태평양 전략: 평가와 전망", pp.189~233 (2019), 오름
  20. 정시행, "림팩훈련 배제․기술수출 통제...美의회, 초강력 ‘중국봉쇄’", 조선일보. 8월 3일, ~ (2018)
  21. 정원교, "후진타오, 中․美협력 4개안 제시...오바마와 정상회담", 국민일보. 6월 20일, ~ (2012)
  22. 2013, , ~
  23. 차창훈, "중국의 신형대국관계(新型大國關係) 제기에 대한 일 고찰: 내용, 배경 및 평가를 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 48(4), pp.5~25 (2014), 한국정치학회[DOI]
  24. 한국군사문제연구원, "2019년 미국-필리핀 바리카탄 연합훈련", 국방일보. 4월 26일, ~ (2019)
  25. 한국군사문제연구원, "미국과 중국의 아세안(ASEAN)과 관계개선 경쟁", 국방일보. 9월 16일, ~ (2019)
  26. 한승주, "아세안이 중요한 이유", 국민일보. 10월 8일, ~ (2019)
  27. Art, Robert J., "A grand strategy for america" (2003), Cornell University Press
  28. Betts, Richard, "Wealth, power, and instability: east asia and the united states after the cold war", International Security, 18(3), pp.34~75 (1994)
  29. Chan, Sarah, "The belt and road initiative : implications for china and east asian economics", The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 34(2), pp.52~78 (2017)
  30. Cole, Bernard D., "The great wall at sea: china's navy in the twenty-first century" (2010), Naval Institute Press
  31. Flint, Colin, "Introduction to geopolitics" (2016), Routledge
  32. Friedberg, Aaron, "Ripe for rivalry: prospects for peace in a multipolar asia", International Security, 18(3), pp.5~33 (1994)
  33. Friedberg, Aaron, "A contest for supremacy: china, america, and the struggle for mastery in asia" (2011), W.W. Norton & Company
  34. Ikenberry, John G., "American hegemony and east asia order", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 58(3), pp.353~367 (2004)
  35. Ikenberry, John G., "The illusion of geopolitics : the enduring power of the liberal order", Foreign Affairs, 93(3), pp.80~90 (2014)
  36. Kaplan, Robert D., "The geography of chinese power : how far beijing reach on land and at sea", Foreign Affairs, 89(3), pp.22~41 (2010)
  37. Kistanov, Valery, "Japan's anti-japanese strategy", East Russia. April 19, ~ (2018)
  38. 임경한, "Global Access vs. Access Denial: US-Chinese Naval Security Competition in the East Asian Seas", The Korean Journal of Security Affairs, 17(1), pp.43~64 (2012), 국가안전보장문제연구소[DOI]
  39. Mackinder, Halford J., "The geopolitics reader" (2005), Routledge
  40. Mahan, Alfred T., "The influence of sea power upon history, 1660-1783" (1987), Dover
  41. Mead, Walter Russell, "The return of geopolitics : the revenge of the revisionist powers", Foreign Affairs, 93(3), pp.69~79 (2014)
  42. O'Rourke, Ronald, "China naval modernization: implications for u.s. navy capabilities-background and issues for congress" (2008), CRS
  43. Segal, Gerald, "East asia and the "constrainment" of china", International Security, 20(4), pp.107~135 (1995)
  44. Spykman, Nicholas J., "The geography of the peace" (1994), Harcourt, Brace & Co
  45. The ASEAN Secretariat and UN Conference on Trade and Development 2018. Asean investment report 2018: foreign direct investment and the digital economy in asean, , ASEAN Secretariat, ~ (2018)
  46. Twining, Daniel, "America's grand design in asia", The Washington Quarterly, 30(3), pp.69~94 (2007)
  47. U. S. Department of Defense, "Indo-pacific strategy report:preparedness, partnerships, and promoting a networked region" (2019), DoD
  48. Yoshihara, Toshi, "Can china defend a core interest in the south china sea?", The Washington Quarterly, 34(2), pp.45~59 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)