處置, 致使, 使役
A Study on Chuzhi, Zhishi, Shiyi
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Chuzhi(處置), zhishi(致使) and shiyi(使役) are representative voice of the Chinese, but they are also often confused so brought a lot of problems in grammatical research. First, we looked at the different concepts of chuzhi and zhishi. The comparison between the typical chuzhi ‘ba’ construction and the typical zhishi ‘shi’ construction shows that the two constructions are completely opposite in terms of object, verb, etc. Therefore, we also observed that both views of chuzhi as the lower category of zhishi and vice versa are problematic, particularly this classification can produce incorrect statistical results. However, in the case of zhishi ‘ba’ construction belongs to a common area of the two voices. Next, zhishi and shiyi also belonged to the same Causative voice, but it was examined that there are other features, and in this process, ‘rang’ construction also has zhishi usages. In short, the control of the relevant animated argument played the most important role in the chuzhi, zhishi, shiyi. This argument’s ability to control made a significant difference in the argument’s animacy, the verb’s transitivity, and the variation of the construction itself, eventually leading to a shift in voice.
Abstract
Chuzhi(處置), zhishi(致使) and shiyi(使役) are representative voice of the Chinese, but they are also often confused so brought a lot of problems in grammatical research. First, we looked at the different concepts of chuzhi and zhishi. The comparison between the typical chuzhi ‘ba’ construction and the typical zhishi ‘shi’ construction shows that the two constructions are completely opposite in terms of object, verb, etc. Therefore, we also observed that both views of chuzhi as the lower category of zhishi and vice versa are problematic, particularly this classification can produce incorrect statistical results. However, in the case of zhishi ‘ba’ construction belongs to a common area of the two voices. Next, zhishi and shiyi also belonged to the same Causative voice, but it was examined that there are other features, and in this process, ‘rang’ construction also has zhishi usages. In short, the control of the relevant animated argument played the most important role in the chuzhi, zhishi, shiyi. This argument’s ability to control made a significant difference in the argument’s animacy, the verb’s transitivity, and the variation of the construction itself, eventually leading to a shift in voice.
참고문헌 (28)
- 朴建榮, "중국어의 把字句 연구", 박사, 중어중문학과, pp.1994
- 조경환, "把字句와 使字句의 비대칭성 고찰", 중국어문학논집, (63), pp.81~101 (2010), 중국어문학연구회
- 조경환, "유생성과 중국어 문법태의 전환에 관한 연구", 중국어문학논집, (80), pp.129~151 (2013), 중국어문학연구회
- 조경환, "중국어 구문론" (2014), 한국문화사
- 馮春田, "近代漢語語法硏究" (1999), 山東敎育出版社
- 郭預, "把字句的語義構造和論元結構", 言語學論叢, 28, pp.152~181 (2003)
- 蒋紹愚, "近代漢語硏究槪要" (2005), 北京大學出版社.
- 蔣紹愚, "近代漢語語法史硏究綜述" (2005), 商務印書館
- 李佐豐, "上古語法硏究", pp.133~143 (2004), 北京廣播學員出版社
- 李宗宏, "現代漢語使因突顯類致使構式硏究", 博士, pp.2013
- 劉培玉, "現代漢語把字句的多角度探究" (2009), 華中師範大學出版社
- 劉子瑜, "漢語史論文集", pp.139~164 (2002), 武漢出版社.
- 宋玉柱, "現代漢語基本知識", pp.114~132 (1992), 語文出版社
- 薛鳳生, "功能主意與漢語語法", pp.34~59 (1994), 北京語言學院出版社
- 宛新政, "現代漢語致使句硏究", 博士, pp.2004
- 王力, "中國語法理論" (1984), 山東敎育出版社
- 吳福祥, "再論處置式的來源", 語言硏究, 3, pp.1~14 (2003)
- 葉向陽, "把字句的致使性硏究", 世界漢語敎學, 68, pp.25~39 (2004)
- 張伯江, "縱施受關係對句式語義" (2009), 商務印書館
- 張麗麗, "从使役到致使", 臺大文史哲學報, 62, pp.119~152 (2005)
- 張豫峰, "現代漢語致使態硏究" (2014), 復旦大學出版社
- 朱德熙, "현대 중국어 어법론" (1997), 사람과 책
- Chao, Yuan Ren, "A Grammar of Spoken Chinese" (2011), 商務印書館
- 박철우, "언어 의미학 개설" (2010), 한국문화사
- Hopper, Paul, "Transitivity in grammar and discourse", Language, 56, pp.251~299 (1980)
- Maldonado, Richardo, "인지언어학 옥스퍼드핸드북", pp.946~993 (2011), 한국문화사
- Takayuki, Miyake, "Corpus-Based Approaches to Sentence Structure", pp.77~94 (2005), John Benjamin Publishing Company
- Teng, Shou-hsin, "Studies on Modern Chinese Syntax" (2005), Crane Publishng Co