피동문과 사역문의 교차현상에 대하여
On the Crossover Phenomena of Passive and Causative Construction
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Causative and passive are types of voice, and independent phenomenon representing active voice and passive voice each. In case of Chinese language we came to know through analysis that ‘把’(Ba), ‘被’(Bei), ‘叫’(Jiao) and ‘讓’(Rang) construction are showing a crossover phenomenon. Therefore as a key to resolution for this problem firstly we went over correlation between causative and passive. Because it's placed a prerequisite that causative should have cause of passivity (resultative), and passive being focused on resultative should imply cause which enables the resultative, we came to know that causative and passive are in causal chain (Croft(1991, 1993), Comrie(1981, 1989)). I have reflected the conclusion of the study on language situation of Chinese. ‘把’(Ba) can appear at long distance ‘被’(long Bei) construction because of causativity imbedded in ‘被’(Bei) construction. And ‘叫’(Jiao) and ‘讓’(Rang) construction show meaning of passive not only intrinsic meaning because of the effects of analogy of typical passive sentence ‘被’(Bei) construction. How speaker chooses which construction and construction form is dependant on which viewpoint the speaker choose, and this is connected to cognitive mechanism of speaker.
Abstract
Causative and passive are types of voice, and independent phenomenon representing active voice and passive voice each. In case of Chinese language we came to know through analysis that ‘把’(Ba), ‘被’(Bei), ‘叫’(Jiao) and ‘讓’(Rang) construction are showing a crossover phenomenon. Therefore as a key to resolution for this problem firstly we went over correlation between causative and passive. Because it's placed a prerequisite that causative should have cause of passivity (resultative), and passive being focused on resultative should imply cause which enables the resultative, we came to know that causative and passive are in causal chain (Croft(1991, 1993), Comrie(1981, 1989)). I have reflected the conclusion of the study on language situation of Chinese. ‘把’(Ba) can appear at long distance ‘被’(long Bei) construction because of causativity imbedded in ‘被’(Bei) construction. And ‘叫’(Jiao) and ‘讓’(Rang) construction show meaning of passive not only intrinsic meaning because of the effects of analogy of typical passive sentence ‘被’(Bei) construction. How speaker chooses which construction and construction form is dependant on which viewpoint the speaker choose, and this is connected to cognitive mechanism of speaker.
참고문헌 (27)
- 김윤신, "사동？피동 동형동사의 논항교체 양상과 의미해석", 한국어 의미학, 21, pp.51~73 (2006), 한국어의미학회
- 김인순, "현대중국어 피동문 연구 : 경동사 가설을 중심으로", 박사, 중일어문학과, pp.2012
- 김혜경, "현대중국어 'V-得'결과구문의 사역성 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2010
- 박향란, "유형론적 관점에서 본 중국어 사동⋅피동 겸용의 기원", 중국언어연구, (41), pp.275~295 (2012), 한국중국언어학회
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (2006), 한국문화사
- 이수련, "인지언어학의 이해", 새얼語文論集, 13, pp.55~84 (2000)
- 이지현, "현대 중국어 피동표지 ‘讓’의 문법화 과정 분석", 중국어문학논집, (44), pp.155~173 (2007), 중국어문학연구회
- 임지룡, "의미의 인지언어학적 탐색" (2008), 한국문화사
- Croft, W., "Syntactic categories and grammatical relations" (1991), University of Chicago Press
- Croft, W., "Voice: Form and Function" (1993), John Benjamins
- Li, Charles N, "표준중국어문법" (1999), 한울아카데미
- Yang, Suying, "Ba and Bei construction in Chinese", Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association, 30, pp.1~36 (1995)
- 鄧思潁, "作格化和漢語被動句", 中國語文, (4), pp.291~301 (2004)
- 鄧思潁, "漢語被動句句法分析的重新思考", 當代語言學, 10(4), pp.308~319 (2008)
- 江藍生, "近代漢語探源" (2000), 商務印書館
- 蔣紹愚, "近代漢語硏究槪況" (2001), 北京大學出版社
- 蔣紹愚, "近代漢語硏究槪要" (2005), 北京大學出版社
- 李珊, "現代漢語被字句硏究" (1994), 北京大學出版社
- 呂叔湘, "現代漢語八百詞" (1984), 商務印書館
- 呂文華, "動詞和句型" (1987), 語文出版社
- 橋本萬太郞, "漢語被動式的歷史․區域發展", 中國語文, (1), pp.36~49 (1987)
- 石毓智, "語法化的動因與機制" (2006), 北京大學出版社
- 宋玉柱, "關於“把”字句的兩個問題", 語文硏究, 2 (1981)
- 王力, "中國現代語法" (2000), 商務印書館
- 王力, "漢語史稿" (2002), 中華書局
- 張伯江, "被字句和把字句的對稱與不對稱", 中國語文, (6), pp.519~524 (2001)
- 張麗麗, "漢語使役句表被動的語義發展", 語言曁語言學, (1) (2006)