장(場)과 장(場)이론에 대한≪장자≫에서의 분석과 확장
Analysis and Expansion in ≪Zhuang zi≫ on ‘Field’ and ‘Field theory’
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Field and Field theory are mentioned in various fields of study. However, it was only microscopic in each area. Of course, there has been no comprehensive review of the Field and Field theory, or research solely on it. Therefore, Field and Field theory, it is difficult to provide ways to improve analysis of the problems. Thus, this paper discusses three main aspects and tries to address some of the problems in the Field and Field Theory. ‘2. Field and Field Theory’, the previously discussed discourse was considered in two separate ways. One is the use of the term Field and Field Theory as it is. The other is when the term Field and Field theory is not used, but is meaningfully the same. This considered the problems and limitations presented in existing studies and discussions. ‘3. Analysis in ≪Zhuang zi≫’, the problem shown in the previous study was mainly analyzed with ≪Zhuang zi≫. It mainly focused on the field of stance, the overlap of the field, and the relativity of the subject and the field. Of course more discussion is possible. However, when considering the intersection of ≪Zhuang zi≫ and Field Theory, it was judged to be the most important part. ‘4. Extension in ≪Zhuang zi≫’, Based on the previous work, the expansion of the Field and Field Theory was focused on ≪Zhuang zi≫. This was discussed in three main aspects. First is the presentation of a larger ‘Field’ concept for coexistence, second, the expansion of the Field concept associated with Place, and third, the recognition of limitations. I think it’s time to start with this research and bring together and link the Field and Field Theory and derive its benefits. Furthermore, developing from existing discussions focused only on the subject or structure, It is necessary to find a balance of thinking by keeping in mind the relationship and change between the subject and the field.
Abstract
Field and Field theory are mentioned in various fields of study. However, it was only microscopic in each area. Of course, there has been no comprehensive review of the Field and Field theory, or research solely on it. Therefore, Field and Field theory, it is difficult to provide ways to improve analysis of the problems. Thus, this paper discusses three main aspects and tries to address some of the problems in the Field and Field Theory. ‘2. Field and Field Theory’, the previously discussed discourse was considered in two separate ways. One is the use of the term Field and Field Theory as it is. The other is when the term Field and Field theory is not used, but is meaningfully the same. This considered the problems and limitations presented in existing studies and discussions. ‘3. Analysis in ≪Zhuang zi≫’, the problem shown in the previous study was mainly analyzed with ≪Zhuang zi≫. It mainly focused on the field of stance, the overlap of the field, and the relativity of the subject and the field. Of course more discussion is possible. However, when considering the intersection of ≪Zhuang zi≫ and Field Theory, it was judged to be the most important part. ‘4. Extension in ≪Zhuang zi≫’, Based on the previous work, the expansion of the Field and Field Theory was focused on ≪Zhuang zi≫. This was discussed in three main aspects. First is the presentation of a larger ‘Field’ concept for coexistence, second, the expansion of the Field concept associated with Place, and third, the recognition of limitations. I think it’s time to start with this research and bring together and link the Field and Field Theory and derive its benefits. Furthermore, developing from existing discussions focused only on the subject or structure, It is necessary to find a balance of thinking by keeping in mind the relationship and change between the subject and the field.
참고문헌 (32)
- 강학순, "한국 전통문화 속에 나타난 ‘장소론’ 읽기 －하이데거의 ‘존재의 장소론’과의 대화의 시도－", 현대유럽철학연구, (31), pp.1~29 (2013), 한국하이데거학회
- 金德三, "中國 道家史 序說Ⅰ" (2004), 경인문화사
- 김덕삼, "場의 변화에 따른 孝의 역할 고찰", 유교사상문화연구, (52), pp.155~178 (2013), 한국유교학회[DOI]
- 김덕삼, "『장자(莊子)』와 제프 말파스(Jeff Malpas)의 입장에서 본 ‘장소와 존재’", 동방문화와 사상, (9), pp.215~240 (2020), 동양학연구소[DOI]
- 김덕삼, "한국에서 진행된 ‘문학을 기초로 한 예술’에서의 ‘변화’와 그 속에서의 ‘패턴’탐구", 인문과 예술, (7), pp.167~185 (2019), 인문예술학회[DOI]
- 김성환, "장소철학" (2020), 서광사
- 김승섭, "아픔이 길이 되려면" (2017), 동아시아
- 김호동, "아틀라스 중앙유라시아사" (2017), 사계절
- 니클라스 루만, "사회적 체계들" (2020), 한길사
- 디 브라운, "나를 운디드니에 묻어주오" (2002), 나무심는사람
- 레베카 코스타, "지금, 경계선에서" (2011), 쌤앤파커스
- 말파스, "장소와 경험" (2014), 에코리브로
- 미치오 카쿠, "초공간" (2019), 김영사
- 박병기, "場理論 레빈" (1998), 교육과학사
- 야마구치 마사오, "문화와 양의성" (2014)
- 에드워드 렐프, "장소와 장소상실" (2017), 논형
- 에드워드 S. 케이시, "장소의 운명: 철학의 역사" (2016), 에코리브르
- 이기상, "하이데거 철학에의 안내" (1993), 서광사
- 이푸투안, "토포필리아 환경 지각, 태도, 가치의 연구" (2011), 에코리브르
- 쿠르트 레빈, "사회과학에서의 場理論" (1987), 민음사
- 크레스웰, "장소" (2016), 시스마프레스
- 탈콧트 파슨스, "현대사회들의 체계" (1999), 새물결
- 토마스 쿤, "과학혁명의 구조" (1992), 동아출판사
- 하이데거, "존재와 시간" (2007), 까치
- 金德三, "相生與老子思想", 中國道敎, 73 (2003)
- 劉沛林, "風水-中國人的環境觀" (1999), 上海三聯書店
- 鄭湧, "道家文化硏究 第二輯" (1992), 上海考籍出版社
- 中国土木建筑百科辞典总编委会, "中国土木建筑百科辞典" (1999), 中国建筑工业出版社
- 陳鼓應, "莊子今注今譯" (2001), 中華書局
- 漢語大詞典編輯委員會, "漢語大詞典 8권" (1994), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 漢語大詞典編輯委員會, "漢語大詞典 2권" (1994), 漢語大詞典出版社
- 胡家聰, "道家文化硏究 第十五輯" (1999), 三聯書店