老莊사상과 인지적 지도 그리기 ― 認識과 主/客의 문제를 중심으로
Cognitive Mapping of Lao-Zhuang Thought: with the Problem of Cognition and Subject/Object as the Central Figure
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Related with actual beings in the world, 『Laozi』 said, ‘Through a person who knows says, a person who says does not know’. In relevant to essence of ‘Beauty', 『Zhuangzi』 also said ‘How can I know about the classification' and he took a reserved attitude. Why did Laozi and Zhuangzi take a reserved attitude on analysis or judgment about object-world? Whey did they try to keep silent and said that it can not be said about the actual beings in the world? Moreover, although they said like tat, how was it possible to say continuously and to conduct of life? The purpose of this study is to investigate inside logic of Lao-Zhuang with the problem of cognition and subject/object as the central point. For this, in this studying, reconstruction, not a reconstruction in meaning of language already said by Lao-Zhuang, of their cognitional form was endeavored by setting premise like that form of cognition determines ‘world'. Lao-Zhuang recognized the world as ‘that-this’, ‘existence-nothing’ are composed of relative relation by relative difference. The though like that of them made their special method on language and conduct. In other words, This world does not have actual being by itself, everything can obtain its own identity through relationship of relative difference with other things. Therefore when one tried to say ‘something’, he/she always has to say in context of it. So, he/she has no choice but to say in context continuously or keeps silent. Conduct also has to acts in context with various ways. In conclusion, for Lao-Zhuang, anything does not be fixed, and it can not.
Abstract
Related with actual beings in the world, 『Laozi』 said, ‘Through a person who knows says, a person who says does not know’. In relevant to essence of ‘Beauty', 『Zhuangzi』 also said ‘How can I know about the classification' and he took a reserved attitude. Why did Laozi and Zhuangzi take a reserved attitude on analysis or judgment about object-world? Whey did they try to keep silent and said that it can not be said about the actual beings in the world? Moreover, although they said like tat, how was it possible to say continuously and to conduct of life? The purpose of this study is to investigate inside logic of Lao-Zhuang with the problem of cognition and subject/object as the central point. For this, in this studying, reconstruction, not a reconstruction in meaning of language already said by Lao-Zhuang, of their cognitional form was endeavored by setting premise like that form of cognition determines ‘world'. Lao-Zhuang recognized the world as ‘that-this’, ‘existence-nothing’ are composed of relative relation by relative difference. The though like that of them made their special method on language and conduct. In other words, This world does not have actual being by itself, everything can obtain its own identity through relationship of relative difference with other things. Therefore when one tried to say ‘something’, he/she always has to say in context of it. So, he/she has no choice but to say in context continuously or keeps silent. Conduct also has to acts in context with various ways. In conclusion, for Lao-Zhuang, anything does not be fixed, and it can not.
참고문헌 (18)
- 郭慶藩, "莊子集釋" (1997), 中華書局
- 안동림, "장자" (1996), 현암사
- 기세춘, "장자" (2007), 바이북스
- 김형효, "사유하는 도덕경" (2004), 소나무
- 王弼, "왕필의 노자" (1997), 예문서원
- 김지하, "‘기우뚱한 균형’에 관하여. in: 동아시아, 문제와 시각" (1995), 문학과 지성사
- 김항배, "불교와 도가사상" (1999), 동국대학교 출판부
- 김형효, "老莊 사상의 해체적 독법" (1999), 청계
- 박이문, "老莊思想" (1994), 문학과 지성사
- 서광선, "비트겐슈타인" (1997), 이화여자대학교 출판부
- 아리스토텔레스, "니코마코스 윤리학" (1984), 서광사
- 원정근, "도가철학의 사유방식" (1997), 법인문화사
- 이중도, "아함의 중도체계" (1992), 불광출판사
- 장파, "동양과 서양, 그리고 미학" (1999), 푸른숲
- 정진배, "‘탈’현대와 동양적 사유논리" (2008), 차이나하우스
- 정진배, "중국 현대 문학과 현대성 이데올로기" (2001), 문학과지성사
- 토마스 S. 쿤, "과학혁명의 구조" (2001), 까치
- M. 하이데거, "예술 작품의 근원" (1996), 예전사