본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 사동 표현과 중국어와의 대조 연구

A Comparative Study on Korean Causativization & Chinese

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper takes the Korean and Chinese Causativization for a comparative study. Generally speaking, there are two forms of Korean causativization, the short form and the long term causativization. The short form is divided into the causativization which is constituted with causative verb and which is constituted with ‘sikita’. The long form is constituted with ‘-ke hata’. The result of the comparison is, it’s very difficult to find out a certain regularity to express the short form Korean causativization with Chinese. In some cases, we can express it with ‘the 把construction’ Sometimes, we can translate it into Chinese causativization. And the rest can be only translated into a normal sentence. Meanwhile, all the Korean causativization with ‘sikita’ & long form causativization can be translated into the Chinese causativization. The result accords with our assumption and expectation.

Abstract

This paper takes the Korean and Chinese Causativization for a comparative study. Generally speaking, there are two forms of Korean causativization, the short form and the long term causativization. The short form is divided into the causativization which is constituted with causative verb and which is constituted with ‘sikita’. The long form is constituted with ‘-ke hata’. The result of the comparison is, it’s very difficult to find out a certain regularity to express the short form Korean causativization with Chinese. In some cases, we can express it with ‘the 把construction’ Sometimes, we can translate it into Chinese causativization. And the rest can be only translated into a normal sentence. Meanwhile, all the Korean causativization with ‘sikita’ & long form causativization can be translated into the Chinese causativization. The result accords with our assumption and expectation.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 남기심, "국어문법탐구Ⅰ" (1996), 태학사
  2. 남기심, "현대국어통사론" (2001), 태학사
  3. 남기심, "표준국어문법론" (1993), 탑출판사
  4. 양정석, "국어동사의의미분석과연결이론" (1995), 박이정
  5. 양정석, "한국어통사구조론" (2005), 한국문화사
  6. 왕례량, "한국어 보조용언과 중국어와의 대조 연구", 문법 교육, 5 (2006), 한국문법교육학회
  7. 찰스N. 리, "표준중국어문법" (1996), 한울아카데미
  8. 최재희, "한국어문법론" (2004), 태학사
  9. 허웅, "국어학-우리말의오늘ㆍ어제" (1983), 샘문화사
  10. 허웅, "20세기우리말의통사론(고친판)" (2000), 샘문화사
  11. 허웅, "20세기우리말의형태론(고친판)" (2000), 샘문화사
  12. 柳英綠, "韓漢語語法對比" (1999), 延邊大學出版社
  13. 柳英綠, "韓漢翻譯基礎" (2002), 延邊大學出版社
  14. 朱德熙, "語法講義" (1982), 商務印書館
  15. 呂叔, "現代漢語800詞" (1980), 商務印書館
  16. 呂叔湘, "漢語語法論文集" (1999), 商務印書館
  17. 範開泰, "現代漢語語法分析" (2000), 華東師範大學出版社
  18. 陳昌來, "現代漢語語法分析" (2000), 華東師範大學出版社
  19. 趙元任, "漢語口語語法" (1979), 商務印書館

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (35건)