한국어와 중국어의 사동구조 대조 - 사동화 내포 구조를 중심으로 -
Comparisons of Causative Structures in Korean and Chinese: Focusing on Sizes of Embedded Structures in Causation
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper presents a comparative syntactic analysis of Korean and Chinese causatives, based on Pylkkänen(2002)’s parametric theory on causatives. Both languages are identified as voice-splitting languages, in which a Cause head, responsible for introducing a causing event, projects independently from a Voice head introducing an external argument. Also, Korean and Chinese have three types of causatives, which vary depending on the sizes of clauses that can be embedded by a Cause head, namely, a root phrase, a vP, and a phasal VoiceP structure. The presented analysis can be supported by evidence from the retainability of idiomatic interpretations of idioms depending on voice alternations.
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative syntactic analysis of Korean and Chinese causatives, based on Pylkkänen(2002)’s parametric theory on causatives. Both languages are identified as voice-splitting languages, in which a Cause head, responsible for introducing a causing event, projects independently from a Voice head introducing an external argument. Also, Korean and Chinese have three types of causatives, which vary depending on the sizes of clauses that can be embedded by a Cause head, namely, a root phrase, a vP, and a phasal VoiceP structure. The presented analysis can be supported by evidence from the retainability of idiomatic interpretations of idioms depending on voice alternations.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김영희, "‘–게 하–’ 사동 구문의 세 유형", 어문학, 54, pp.89~120 (1992), 한국어문학회
- 박소영, "한국어 사동문의 통사론적 도출", 언어, 37(3), pp.547~570 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 박소영, "태의 교체와 관용어 해석 원리", 현대문법연구, (69), pp.1~20 (2012), 현대문법학회
- 박소영, "한국어 통사사동의 세 유형", 현대문법연구, (74), pp.59~76 (2013), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 박은석, "汉韩分析型致使结构比较研究", 박사, pp.2010
- Basciano, B., "Verbal Compounding and Causativity in Mandarin Chinese", Ph. D., pp.2010
- Borer, H., "The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface", pp.103~149 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), The MIT Press
- Gu, Y., "The Syntax of Resultative and Causative Compounds in Chinese", Ph.D., pp.1992
- Gu, Y., "Studies in Chinese Linguistics", pp.93~115 (1998), LSHK
- Jung, H-K., "On the Syntax of Applicative and Causative Constructions", Ph.D., pp.2014
- Kim, K-M., "High applicatives in korean causatives and passives", Lingua, 121, pp.485~510 (2011)
- Kratzer, A., "Phrase Structure and the Lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluwer
- Lin, J., "Event structure and the encoding of arguments: The syntax of the Mandarin and English verb phrase", pp.2004
- Marantz, A., "No escape from syntax", University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), pp.201~225 (1997)
- Marantz, A., "Phases and Words", ms, pp.2008
- Marantz, A., "Verbal argument structure : Events and participants", Lingua, 130, pp.152~168 (2013)
- Pylkkänen, L., "Introducing Arguments", Ph.D., pp.2002
- Son, M-J., "Causation and Syntactic decomposition of Events", Ph.D., pp.2006
- 呂叔湘, "中國文法要略" (1942), 商務印書館
- 沈阳, "生成语法理论与汉语语法研究" (2001), 黑龙江教育出版社
- 熊仲儒, "现代汉语中的致使句式", 博士, 语言学及应用语言学, pp.2003