본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

瞿秋白의 동방문화관 탐색— 1920년대 초반 논술을 중심으로

A Research on Qu Qiu Bai’s Concepts of Eastern Culture— Focusing on His Essays of the Early 1920’s

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Based on Marxist materialism, Qu Qiubai criticized Eastern cultural group who attempted to deny the historical development of society and return to old ethics. It is his mission to build a new culture for all mankind in the face of conflict between Western capitalist culture and Eastern ethics and morality. But he did not completely deny Eastern culture. Culture is a matter of the subject’s attitude and method, and the creation of a new culture was also to reestablish the subject’s ethics and morals. At this time, the particularity of the East was related to the construction of a new culture. Debating with Eastern culturalists, Qu Qiubai pointed out the errors of anti-state and anti-capitalist views in the light of the historical materialism and, criticized Eastern culural group for asking to return old ethics and old system. Instead he suggested the popularization of benovelence, righteous and morality as a new culture. Qu Qiubai noted the possibility of peasants under particular circumstances in China. In the past, peasants, who occupied the majority of the population, were subordinates to the gentry for the sake of their private interests. Quchubai wanted to separate them from the former ruling class, gentry. He tried to separate the peasants and the gentry not only economically and socially but also ethically and morally. Qu Qiubai demanded that the peasants overcome the limitations of the petit bourgeois and move away from the old ethics of loyalty to the sovereign(忠君) and filial obedience(孝順). He also demanded them to organize and unite in an active(積極), courageous(勇進), rebellious(反抗), uplifting(興奮) spirit for the benefit of humanity including the peasants itself. The establishment of this new morality of the peasants promoted the revolution of the proletarian class in solidarity with the working class, which in turn realized the real liberation of mankind.

Abstract

Based on Marxist materialism, Qu Qiubai criticized Eastern cultural group who attempted to deny the historical development of society and return to old ethics. It is his mission to build a new culture for all mankind in the face of conflict between Western capitalist culture and Eastern ethics and morality. But he did not completely deny Eastern culture. Culture is a matter of the subject’s attitude and method, and the creation of a new culture was also to reestablish the subject’s ethics and morals. At this time, the particularity of the East was related to the construction of a new culture. Debating with Eastern culturalists, Qu Qiubai pointed out the errors of anti-state and anti-capitalist views in the light of the historical materialism and, criticized Eastern culural group for asking to return old ethics and old system. Instead he suggested the popularization of benovelence, righteous and morality as a new culture. Qu Qiubai noted the possibility of peasants under particular circumstances in China. In the past, peasants, who occupied the majority of the population, were subordinates to the gentry for the sake of their private interests. Quchubai wanted to separate them from the former ruling class, gentry. He tried to separate the peasants and the gentry not only economically and socially but also ethically and morally. Qu Qiubai demanded that the peasants overcome the limitations of the petit bourgeois and move away from the old ethics of loyalty to the sovereign(忠君) and filial obedience(孝順). He also demanded them to organize and unite in an active(積極), courageous(勇進), rebellious(反抗), uplifting(興奮) spirit for the benefit of humanity including the peasants itself. The establishment of this new morality of the peasants promoted the revolution of the proletarian class in solidarity with the working class, which in turn realized the real liberation of mankind.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
  2. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
  3. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅政治理論編 第1卷" (2013), 人民文學出版社
  4. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
  5. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
  6. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅政治理論編 第2卷" (2013), 人民出版社
  7. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅政治理論編 第2卷" (2013), 人民出版社
  8. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅政治理論編 第2卷" (2013), 人民出版社
  9. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅政治理論編 第2卷" (2013), 人民文學出版社
  10. 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白文集⋅政治理論編 第2卷" (2013), 人民出版社
  11. 瞿秋白, "東方文化與世界革命", 瞿秋白文集⋅政治理論編, 2
  12. 范忠程, "瞿秋白對“東方文化派”的剖析", 湖南師院學報, (1) (1983)
  13. 余玉花, "瞿秋白倫理思想探微", 華東師範大學學報, (1) (1999)
  14. 王文強, "瞿秋白革命文化觀的特色和地位", 江蘇石油化工學院學報, 3(3) (2002)
  15. 汪祿應, "瞿秋白的文化觀", 湖南第一師範學報, 3(4) (2003)
  16. 羅宗宇, "論瞿秋白對“東方文化派”的批判", 湖南第一師範學報, 3(4) (2003)
  17. 楊建生, "瞿秋白的中西文化觀與當代文化建設", 江南論壇, (2) (2004), 無錫市哲學會科學聯合會
  18. 楊成敏, "論瞿秋白文化思想的時代特點", 河南師範大學學報, 33(6) (2006)
  19. 張麗, "瞿秋白文化思想研究", 博士, pp.2016
  20. 권세은, "1920-30년대 소비에트 체제의 관리에 관한 논쟁", 아태연구, 16(2), pp.1~21 (2009), 국제지역연구원[DOI]
  21. 梁漱溟, "동서 문화와 철학" (2005), 솔
  22. 費孝通, "중국 사회문화의 원형" (2011), 비봉출판사
  23. 張君勱, "과학과 인생관" (2016), 산지니

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)