취추바이의 ‘프로대중문예’에 관한 소고
A Study on Qu Qiubai’s ‘Proletarian Mass Literature’
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
At the transition period of the nature of the Chinese revolution, Qu Qiubai connected the transition of the revolution with reflection and criticism of the existing Chinese modernization. He defined the existing modernization as westernization, and recognized the core of problems as the subject. Chinese bourgeoisie compromised with the comprador class and imperialist to marginalize other classes. He believed that the inherent problems of the existing modernization could be overcome when those excluded from bourgeoisie awakened and took a dominant position on their own. He proposed the proletariat including the working class as the subject of the revolution, and also suggested that the proletariat freed from the ideology of the bourgeoisie to awaken and arm with the ideology of the masses. He expected that the proletariat mass would be able to tell their own stories in their own langguage and their own way. However, due to the perception of the socialist revolution based on his experiences in Soviet Russian society, Qu Qiubai failed to develop an alternative in the problem of the mass subject and the content and role of the proletarian mass literature. The coloniality of Western modernity still remained in his discussion. The proletariat mass lost their spontaneity as they were interpellate as the subject and in the proletarian mass literature, they remained the targets of the propagation for socialist ideology and the mobilization for building and protecting the state. The interpellationg is conducted by the interpellator and the interpellator calling name does not correspond with the subject. The interpellator use interpellation in order to reproduce their dominance. The goal of the interpellator was to acquire political power and establish the state. The subject interpelled under these political intentions are still dependent. If we do not reflect these problems, which can be found in Qiu Qubai’s proletarian mass literature, the interpellation cannot be out of the limit of reproducing dependency. In other words, the problem of modernity, coloniality, has not been overcome. Due to this situation, Marxism in China failed to advance to an alternative modernity.
Abstract
At the transition period of the nature of the Chinese revolution, Qu Qiubai connected the transition of the revolution with reflection and criticism of the existing Chinese modernization. He defined the existing modernization as westernization, and recognized the core of problems as the subject. Chinese bourgeoisie compromised with the comprador class and imperialist to marginalize other classes. He believed that the inherent problems of the existing modernization could be overcome when those excluded from bourgeoisie awakened and took a dominant position on their own. He proposed the proletariat including the working class as the subject of the revolution, and also suggested that the proletariat freed from the ideology of the bourgeoisie to awaken and arm with the ideology of the masses. He expected that the proletariat mass would be able to tell their own stories in their own langguage and their own way. However, due to the perception of the socialist revolution based on his experiences in Soviet Russian society, Qu Qiubai failed to develop an alternative in the problem of the mass subject and the content and role of the proletarian mass literature. The coloniality of Western modernity still remained in his discussion. The proletariat mass lost their spontaneity as they were interpellate as the subject and in the proletarian mass literature, they remained the targets of the propagation for socialist ideology and the mobilization for building and protecting the state. The interpellationg is conducted by the interpellator and the interpellator calling name does not correspond with the subject. The interpellator use interpellation in order to reproduce their dominance. The goal of the interpellator was to acquire political power and establish the state. The subject interpelled under these political intentions are still dependent. If we do not reflect these problems, which can be found in Qiu Qubai’s proletarian mass literature, the interpellation cannot be out of the limit of reproducing dependency. In other words, the problem of modernity, coloniality, has not been overcome. Due to this situation, Marxism in China failed to advance to an alternative modernity.
참고문헌 (24)
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第1卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第3卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第3卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第3卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第3卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 瞿秋白, "瞿秋白選集⋅文學編 第3卷" (1998), 人民文學出版社
- 루이 알뛰세르, "아미엥에서의 주장" (1994), 솔
- 윌터 D. 미뇰로, "서구 근대성의 어두운 이면" (2018), 현암사
- 홀거 지이겔, "소비에트 문학이론" (1988), 연구사
- C. V. James, "사회주의 리얼리즘론" (1990), 녹진
- 한양대학교 아태지역연구센터, "유토피아의 환영" (2010), 한울아카데미
- Liu Kang, "Aesthetics and Marxism" (2000), Duke University Press
- 김진공, "현대 중국의 文藝大衆化를 보는 관점에 대한 재검토", 중국문학, 42, pp.187~198 (2004), 한국중국어문학회
- 김언하, "≪혁명문학≫ 운동의 논리와 그 의의", 중국어문학, 18 (1990), 영남중국어문학회
- 김헌기, "마르크스주의 역사학에 대한 그람시의 개입-서발턴과 재현-", 서양사론, (140), pp.50~77 (2019), 한국서양사학회
- 성민엽, "중국 혁명문학과 민족형식 논쟁", 실천문학, (봄) (1985)
- 林春城, "中國文藝大衆化論爭(1930-1932)의 展開過程및 爭點에 대한 評價", 中國研究 (1992), 中國問題研究所
- 박자영, "혁명, 노동, 지식-1920년대 상하이의 혁명문학 논쟁 재론-", 사이間SAI, (16), pp.53~81 (2014), 국제한국문학문화학회[DOI]
- 장윤미, "중국공산당 100년의 변천" (2021), 책과 함께
