1920년대 초반 중국 사회주의 인식의 변화
A Transition of Recognition on Socialism in Early 1920’s China
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The May Fourth Movement was a kind of anti-political movement that could reform ‘society’ with new morality and new culture, while it was a political revolution to build a nation state in China. It had conflicting two aspect, one was the social movement aiming at western modernization of culture and morality, the other was more conservative tendency to revive traditional Chinese morality and culture in order to cure ills of western modernization. At that time socialism in China had been taken for anarchism, syndicalism and guild-socialism. These kind of socialism accorded closely with the end of New Culture Movement, that provide China with new morality and culture for social reform. But while May Fourth Movement was in decline, Soviet Russia itself and its society, socialism, socialistic culture and morality had came up as the third way for social reform. Failing to realize ideal in real world, Qu Qiubai’s own intellectual growth was in stalemate, in addition he was existentially at stake, as the gentry which he belonged to, collapsed to be vanished in ‘soceity’ not existing in the old dynastic system of China. Qu Qiubai headed for Soviet Russia in order to find out new way for survival of Chinese society as well as to make breakthrough for personal survival. He thought it needed to comprehend ‘society’ for survival and the best way to comprehend it was to approach it with subjective emotion and psychology in response it as the environment around the subject, not with science and philosophy. So he wrote down lots of experiences in Soviet Russia by literary travelogue which, he thought, was appropriate to express emotion and psychology. He reviewed social psychology, that is culture and morality of various class in Soviet Russia to foster a hope from the proletariat who could reconcile its interest with that of whole society. And he thought that Chinese people as a nation could create new culture and morality which breakdown broker culture of the West and the silence of the East, and, as an child of eastern culture, presumed his mission to participate in establishing these culture and morality.
Abstract
The May Fourth Movement was a kind of anti-political movement that could reform ‘society’ with new morality and new culture, while it was a political revolution to build a nation state in China. It had conflicting two aspect, one was the social movement aiming at western modernization of culture and morality, the other was more conservative tendency to revive traditional Chinese morality and culture in order to cure ills of western modernization. At that time socialism in China had been taken for anarchism, syndicalism and guild-socialism. These kind of socialism accorded closely with the end of New Culture Movement, that provide China with new morality and culture for social reform. But while May Fourth Movement was in decline, Soviet Russia itself and its society, socialism, socialistic culture and morality had came up as the third way for social reform. Failing to realize ideal in real world, Qu Qiubai’s own intellectual growth was in stalemate, in addition he was existentially at stake, as the gentry which he belonged to, collapsed to be vanished in ‘soceity’ not existing in the old dynastic system of China. Qu Qiubai headed for Soviet Russia in order to find out new way for survival of Chinese society as well as to make breakthrough for personal survival. He thought it needed to comprehend ‘society’ for survival and the best way to comprehend it was to approach it with subjective emotion and psychology in response it as the environment around the subject, not with science and philosophy. So he wrote down lots of experiences in Soviet Russia by literary travelogue which, he thought, was appropriate to express emotion and psychology. He reviewed social psychology, that is culture and morality of various class in Soviet Russia to foster a hope from the proletariat who could reconcile its interest with that of whole society. And he thought that Chinese people as a nation could create new culture and morality which breakdown broker culture of the West and the silence of the East, and, as an child of eastern culture, presumed his mission to participate in establishing these culture and morality.
참고문헌 (19)
- 瞿秋白, "歷史地理類 影印本" (1996), 上海書店
- 瞿秋白, "歷史地理類 影印本" (1996), 上海書店
- 백영서, "中國現代大學文化研究" (1994), 大正文化社
- 서진영, "중국혁명사" (1992), 한울아카데미
- 송중서, "현대 신유학의 역정" (2010), 문사철
- Paul G. Pickowicz, "중국 마르크스주의 문예이론" (1991), 청년사
- 김판수, "중국 개조론(改造論)과 낡은 지배구조의 지속에 대한 저항(1915-1929): 공산당 내부의 개조 각축을 중심으로", 중앙사론, (42), pp.405~447 (2015), 중앙사학연구소
- 백원담, "아시아 내셔널리즘과 5.4 ― 5.4 운동에서 ‘문화’와 ‘민족’ 문제의 재인식", 중국현대문학, (47), pp.29~76 (2008), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 이주노, "新文化運動期 中國知識人의 사유체계 연구 ― 東西文化論戰을 중심으로", 중국현대문학, (69), pp.115~148 (2014), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 조경란, "5ㆍ4 신지식인 집단의 출현과 보수주의 - 신문화운동에 대한 보수주의의 초기적 대응 -", 중국근현대사연구, (44), pp.61~89 (2009), 중국근현대사학회
- 차태근, "5·4운동 시기 문명 전환론과 사회주의", 중국현대문학, (53), pp.27~62 (2010), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 차태근, "“사회론”적 전환과 비정치적 정치 ― “5ㆍ4 운동”에 대한 독법 ―", 중국근현대사연구, (43), pp.27~48 (2009), 중국근현대사학회
- 허증, "1920년대 ‘과학․현학’ 논쟁과 ‘救亡’ 의식", 대구사학, 103, pp.239~278 (2011), 대구사학회
- 康沛竹, "五四前後瞿秋白思想演變的影向因素探析", 徐州工程學院學報, 26(5) (2011)
- 劉黎紅, "五四時期知識分子階層的自我邊緣化思想 — 以瞿秋白爲個案", 東方論壇, (2) (2012)
- 劉小中, "從≪餓鄕紀程≫ ≪赤都心史≫看瞿秋白早期散文理念的獨特性和文體的獨創性", 西南民族大學學報, 25(10) (2004)
- 歐陽明, "瞿秋白蘇俄采訪時期思想變革探析", 中共黨史硏究, (4) (2003)
- 彭維鋒, "瞿秋白的“五四”批判", 開封大學學報, 22(4) (2008)
- Arif Dirlik, "The Origins of Chinese Communism" (1989), Oxford University Press
