본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

理 개념 분석을 통한 주희의 논리적 체계 탐구

The Logic Structure of Zhu Xi, As Seen Through Li

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Zhu-Xi’s texts introduce one to an entirely different conceptual world. Since we are separated by a vastly different time and place, there is a considerable gap between Zhu-Xi’s conceptual world and our own. Therefore, for us living in the present, Zhu-Xi’s use of language may seem vague and full of logical errors. if scrutinized, however, his systematical relation between concepts can be found. This essay attempts to elucidate Zhu-Xi’s logic structure through an analysis of the concept of li(理). Li is one of the most important concepts addressed by neo-Confucianism. But some of the descriptions given to li seem to contradict each other. In order to resolve the contradictions between the descriptions related to li., a hypothesized logical framework (the distinction between the features of a things composition and functions) has been suggested, and the detailed categories were analyzed. Moreover, the essay claims that li is not an independent substance, but a kind of categories.

Abstract

Zhu-Xi’s texts introduce one to an entirely different conceptual world. Since we are separated by a vastly different time and place, there is a considerable gap between Zhu-Xi’s conceptual world and our own. Therefore, for us living in the present, Zhu-Xi’s use of language may seem vague and full of logical errors. if scrutinized, however, his systematical relation between concepts can be found. This essay attempts to elucidate Zhu-Xi’s logic structure through an analysis of the concept of li(理). Li is one of the most important concepts addressed by neo-Confucianism. But some of the descriptions given to li seem to contradict each other. In order to resolve the contradictions between the descriptions related to li., a hypothesized logical framework (the distinction between the features of a things composition and functions) has been suggested, and the detailed categories were analyzed. Moreover, the essay claims that li is not an independent substance, but a kind of categories.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 朱熹, "大學集注" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
  2. 朱熹, "中庸集注" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
  3. 朱熹, "朱子語類" (1986), 中華書局
  4. 朱熹, "朱熹集" (1996), 四川教育出版社
  5. 朱熹, "朱子大全" (2010), 전남 대학교 철학 연구 교육 센터
  6. 朱熹, "朱子文集" (1968), 藝文印書館
  7. 김영식, "주희의 자연철학" (2005), 예문서원
  8. 김우형, "주희철학의 인식론" (2005), 심산
  9. 이승환, "횡설과 수설" (2012), Humanist
  10. 손영식, "성리학의 형이상학 시론" (2007), UUP
  11. Graham, A. C., "Studies In Chinese Philosophy & Philosophical Literature" (1986), The Institute Of East Asian Philosophies
  12. Kant, Immanuel, "The Critique of Pure Reason" (1922), The Macmillan Company

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)