韩汉语解反预期标记“어쩐지”与“怪不得”的认知解读
Cognitive Interpretation of Relieved Counter-Expectation Markers 'Ojjonji' and 'Guàibude' in Korean and Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
'Ojjonji'and 'guàibude' in Korean and Chinese are typical relieved counter-expectation markers in their respective languages, which are mainly driven by the communicative subject's suspicious psychology to produce relieved counter-expectation semantics. Based on previous studies, this paper makes a comparative interpretation of the similarities and differences between 'ojjonji' and 'guàibude' from the cognitive level of disillusion, especially reflecting on causal accessibility and cognitive saltation. We compare from two dimensions: subjective horizontal (dual core) and objective vertical (dual drive). In terms of horizontal causal accessibility, both tend to be forward-driven, but 'guàibude' tends to be more complete than 'ojjonji' in terms of information completeness. In terms of horizontal cognitive saltation, 'ojjonji' breaks through the critical point through the transformation of different categories to achieve a relatively radical transformation saltation, and 'guàibude' realizes a relatively moderate transformation saltation by the side-emphasis of different semantics. In terms of vertical demonstrative resource allocation, the trisection demonstrative system of Korean deviates from the instruction of relieved counter-expectation, while the dichotomy demonstrative system of Chinese is more consistent with the relieved counter-expectation. In terms of vertical resource allocation, 'ojjonji' has relatively narrow sources of information, while 'guàibude' has relatively wide sources of information.
Abstract
'Ojjonji'and 'guàibude' in Korean and Chinese are typical relieved counter-expectation markers in their respective languages, which are mainly driven by the communicative subject's suspicious psychology to produce relieved counter-expectation semantics. Based on previous studies, this paper makes a comparative interpretation of the similarities and differences between 'ojjonji' and 'guàibude' from the cognitive level of disillusion, especially reflecting on causal accessibility and cognitive saltation. We compare from two dimensions: subjective horizontal (dual core) and objective vertical (dual drive). In terms of horizontal causal accessibility, both tend to be forward-driven, but 'guàibude' tends to be more complete than 'ojjonji' in terms of information completeness. In terms of horizontal cognitive saltation, 'ojjonji' breaks through the critical point through the transformation of different categories to achieve a relatively radical transformation saltation, and 'guàibude' realizes a relatively moderate transformation saltation by the side-emphasis of different semantics. In terms of vertical demonstrative resource allocation, the trisection demonstrative system of Korean deviates from the instruction of relieved counter-expectation, while the dichotomy demonstrative system of Chinese is more consistent with the relieved counter-expectation. In terms of vertical resource allocation, 'ojjonji' has relatively narrow sources of information, while 'guàibude' has relatively wide sources of information.
참고문헌 (54)
- 婁文娟, "韓·中 推測 樣態副詞 對照 硏究 : '아마', '어쩌면', '혹시'를 中心으로", 석사, 국어국문학과 국어학전공, pp.2013
- 박상숙, "'어째, 어쩐지'의 의미 고찰", 언어와 정보 사회, 42, pp.61~81 (2021), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 서정수, "국어 문법" (1996), 한양대학교 출판원
- 이주행, "한국어 의존명사의 통사적 연구" (1988), 한샘
- 이지영, "문법사적 관점에서 본 일제 시기 언어의 몇 문제", 한국어학, 40, pp.57~92 (2008), 한국어학회
- 이지영, "‘-은지’와 ‘-을지’의 통시적 변화", 國語學, (53), pp.113~140 (2008), 국어학회[DOI]
- 이현희, "국어의 의문법에 대한 통사적 연구", 석사, pp.1982
- 이현희, "中世國語內的話法의 性格", 한신논문집, 3 (1986)
- 장위흠, "한국어 양태부사와 중국어 어기부사의 비교 연구", 석사, pp.2017
- 정재영, "依存名词'ㄷ'의 文法化" (1996), 태학사
- 정주연, "의문 어미 '-ㄴ가', '-ㄴ지'의 통시적 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2011
- 하의뢰, "어찌-", 어쩌-'류 활용형과 부사에 대한 연구, 서울대학교, 2022
- 洪宗善, "國語 體言化 構文의 硏究", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1986
- 北京大学中文系1955, "现代汉语虚词例释", pp.1982, 1957级语言班
- 陈宝珠, "“怪不得”的语法化", 文学界(理论版), (5) (2010)
- 陈禹, "作为反意外范畴标记的"还不是"", 世界汉语教学, (4) (2018)
- “预期”范畴研究, "陈振宇", 复旦大学暑期FIST课程讲义, ~ (2021)
- 陈振宇, "意外范畴:关于感叹、疑问、否定之间的语用迁移的研究", 当代修辞学, (5) (2015)
- 陈振宇, "反预期与事实性——以“合理性”语句为例", 中国语文, (3) (2019)
- 姜礼立, "回溯推理在语义识解中的应用--以"怪不得"的演变为例", 古汉语研究, (2) (2019)
- 黄福荣, "知识经验与顿悟:来自认知神经科学的证据", 心理科学, (6) (2018)
- 李思旭, "“怪不得”的功能分化及其语法化", 河南科技学院学报, (5) (2020)
- 李雁婷, "基于对外汉语教学的"怪不得"多角度考察", 硕士, pp.2013
- 李宇涵, "现代汉语含指示代词的程度构式研究", 硕士, pp.2022
- 廖秋忠, "现代汉语篇章中的连接成分", 中国语文, (6) (1986)
- 罗劲, "顿悟的大脑机制", 心理学报, (2) (2004)
- 吕叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (1999), 商务印书馆
- 饶宏泉, ""因果达及"与"认识突变"：醒悟义语气副词的功能实现", 汉语学习, (3) (2021)
- 沈家煊, "语言的"主观性"和"主观化"", 外语教学与研究, (4) (2001)
- 沈家煊, "汉语的主观性和汉语语法教学", 汉语学习, (1) (2009)
- 王利, ""怪不得"的语法化", 汉字文化, (1) (2014)
- 吴婷燕, "情态副词"怪不得"的话语关联与语义情态", 世界汉语教学, (3) (2018)
- 袁毓林, "论“连”字句的主观化表达功能——兼论几种相关的“反预期”和“解-反预期”格式", 中国语学（日本）, (253) (2006)
- 张富翠, "论“怪不得”的现状及其历史属性初探", 西南民族大学学报(人文社科版), (11) (2009)
- 张舒雨, "现代汉语领悟类语气副词研究", 硕士, pp.2016
- 张薇, ""怪不得"之"醒悟义"的产生", 南开语言学刊, (1) (2011)
- 张谊生, "副词的篇章连接功能", 语言研究, (1) (1996)
- 韩国语显格助词研究, "赵新建", 国家社会科学基金结项报告书, ~ (2021)
- 郑晓雷, "领悟类语气副词研究", 硕士, pp.2005
- Heritage, John, "Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis" (1984), Cambridge University Press
- Heritage, John, "Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 1 (2012)
- Dahl Öste, "Grammaticalization and the lift cycles of construction" (2000), Stockholm University Press
- De Haan，Ferdinand, "The relation between modality and evidentiality", Linguistische Berichte, 9 (2001)
- Heine Bernd, "Grammaticalization : A Conceptual Framework" (2000), University of Chicago Press
- Johnson, M, "The Body in the Mind" (1987), University of Chicago
- Lakoff, G, "Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things : What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G, "Metaphors We Live By" (1980), University of Chicago
- 강식진, "중한사전(수정본)" (2002), 흑룡강조선민족출판사
- 고려대학교 민족문화연구원, "고려대 중한사전" (2002), 고려대학교 민족문화연구원
- 박용종, "교학사 현대중한사전" (2006), 교학사
- "네이버 중국어사전"[URL]
- "에듀월드 표준한한중사전"[URL]
- "BCC语料库"[URL]