信息结构理论视野下汉韩反预期副词语义对比研究
A Comparative Study on the Sematic Meaning of Anti-expectation Adverbs in Chinese and Korean from the Perspective of Information Structure Theory
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
反预期范畴是语义-语用界面研究的重要概念之一，不仅反映了客观世界真值语义关系和条件，也反映了交际双方的主观认识或态度。本文主要基于信息结构理论，对汉韩语反预期副词进行分类，主要分出了意外惊讶类、意外不满类、事实醒悟类、事实修正类、他指转折类、他指确认类、典型转折类、极性转折类八种类型，并对汉韩语各类型的语义进行对比分析，通过初步对比了解汉韩反预期副词在语义表达上的异同，并借助信息结构理论进行分析解释。初步可知，相同点方面，汉韩反预期副词可以作为焦点敏感算子发挥作用，其前提示的信息具有“显性+隐性”双重已知信息的特征，反预期副词可以介引出带有焦点属性的新信息；不同点方面，汉韩反预期副词并非完全一一对应，两者在信息结构的强度和主观性方面存在较明显差异。
Abstract
Anti-expectation category is one of the important concepts in semantic-pragmatic interface research. It not only reflects the truth-value sematic relationship and conditions of the objective world, but also reflects the subjective understanding or attitude of both parties in communication. This article is mainly based on the theory of information structure to classify anti-expectation adverbs in Chinese and Korean. It is mainly divided into eight categories: unexpected surprise type, unexpected dissatisfaction type, fact awakening type, fact correction type, typical turning type and polarity turning type. The semantics of each type of Chinese and Korean are compared and analyzed, and the similarities and differences of anti-expectation adverbs in Chinese and Korean are understood through preliminary comparisons, and they are analyzed and explained by information structure theory. Through preliminary analysis, we can see that there is no one-to-one correspondence between Chinese and Korean anti-expectation adverbs, and there are differences in information intensity and subjectivity.
참고문헌 (17)
- 陈振宇, "汉语的指称与命题—语法中的语义学原理" (2017), 上海人民出版社
- 박진호, "韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소", 언어와 정보 사회, 15, pp.1~25 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
- 이윤복, "한국어의 의외성을 나타내는 어미 연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 진관초, "한국어 의외성 표지 ‘-다니’에 대한 연구", 한국어 의미학, 54, pp.91~126 (2016), 한국어의미학회[DOI]
- 황련화, "유형론에 기반한 한중 문법상(相)의 의미영역과 그 실현 양상", 중국학, (75), pp.231~252 (2021), 대한중국학회[DOI]
- 陈 虎, "语言信息结构及其多视角评述", 解放军外国语学院学报, 26 (2003), 解放军外国语学院
- 陈振宇, "反预期与事实性—以“合理性”语句为例", 中国语文, 390 (2019), 中国社会科学院语言研究所
- 陆方喆, "反预期标记的形式与功能", 语言科学, 18, 徐州师范大学语言所
- 陆俭明, "试说语言信息结构", 学术交流, 243, 黑龙江省社会科学联合会
- 吴福祥, "试说“X不比Y·Z”的语用功能", 中国语文, 300 (2004), 中国社会科学院语言研究所
- 袁毓林, "反预期、递进关系和语用尺度的类型——“甚至”和“反而”的语义功能比较", 当代语言学, 10 (2008), 中国社会科学院语言研究所
- 张谊生, "从“X是”的反预期情态看语义积淀对副词主观评注功能的影响——以“硬是、愣是、就是、偏是”的个性差异为例", 语言研究集刊, 16 (2016), 复旦大学汉语言文字学科《语言研究集刊》编委会
- 邓 霞, "现代汉语预期范畴研究", 博士, pp.2019
- 单 威, "现代汉语偏离预期表达式研究", 博士, pp.2017