본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

韩汉语预期性副词“도대체”与“到底”的对比探析

A Comparative Analysis of Korean and Chinese Counter-Expectation Adverbs ‘Dodaeche’ and ‘Dàodǐ’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

There are various grammatical means of expressing counter-expectation categories in Korean and Chinese, adverbs are one of the important means of counter-expectation expression, and adverbs with counter- expectation properties often have more prominent commentary attributes. This paper mainly makes a comparative analysis of the counter- expectation adverbs ‘Dodaeche’ and ‘Dàodǐ’ with similar semantics, focusing on the distribution of the two expressions and the characteristics of expectations. All of these expressions can be used in declarative sentences, interrogative sentences, and exclamatory sentences, and the two kinds of expressions both present the semantic continuum of ‘general doubt-slight anger-stronger criticism and accusation’ in interrogative expressions; The greater the degree, the stronger the negative emotional attitude expressed by the speaker. Second, in terms of differences, in declarative sentences, Korean ‘Dodaeche’ does not have a relatively fixed construction to represent the relieved counter-expectation semantics, while Chinese ‘Dàodǐ’ expresses counter-expectation semantics is more prominent and has a relatively fixed expression form; in interrogative sentences, Korean ‘Dodaeche’ represents a general question with a strong objective attribute, and the objective attribute of Chinese ‘Dàodǐ’ is relatively weak, and the distribution is relatively small; and in the question expression with blame and slight anger, the distribution of Chinese ‘Dàodǐ’ is more prominent than that of Korean ‘Dodaeche’; in exclamatory sentences, Korean ‘Dodaeche’ often appears in the form of ‘Dodaeche+olma……?’, while Chinese ‘Dàodǐ’ mostly appears with ‘!’ in it. Third, the motivations for the above similarities and differences between Korean and Chinese, we preliminarily believe that they are closely related to their respective semantic associations and mechanisms, subjectivity levels, ‘question-deny-couter-expectaiton’ conversion, and the complementary mechanism of language economy.

Abstract

There are various grammatical means of expressing counter-expectation categories in Korean and Chinese, adverbs are one of the important means of counter-expectation expression, and adverbs with counter- expectation properties often have more prominent commentary attributes. This paper mainly makes a comparative analysis of the counter- expectation adverbs ‘Dodaeche’ and ‘Dàodǐ’ with similar semantics, focusing on the distribution of the two expressions and the characteristics of expectations. All of these expressions can be used in declarative sentences, interrogative sentences, and exclamatory sentences, and the two kinds of expressions both present the semantic continuum of ‘general doubt-slight anger-stronger criticism and accusation’ in interrogative expressions; The greater the degree, the stronger the negative emotional attitude expressed by the speaker. Second, in terms of differences, in declarative sentences, Korean ‘Dodaeche’ does not have a relatively fixed construction to represent the relieved counter-expectation semantics, while Chinese ‘Dàodǐ’ expresses counter-expectation semantics is more prominent and has a relatively fixed expression form; in interrogative sentences, Korean ‘Dodaeche’ represents a general question with a strong objective attribute, and the objective attribute of Chinese ‘Dàodǐ’ is relatively weak, and the distribution is relatively small; and in the question expression with blame and slight anger, the distribution of Chinese ‘Dàodǐ’ is more prominent than that of Korean ‘Dodaeche’; in exclamatory sentences, Korean ‘Dodaeche’ often appears in the form of ‘Dodaeche+olma……?’, while Chinese ‘Dàodǐ’ mostly appears with ‘!’ in it. Third, the motivations for the above similarities and differences between Korean and Chinese, we preliminarily believe that they are closely related to their respective semantic associations and mechanisms, subjectivity levels, ‘question-deny-couter-expectaiton’ conversion, and the complementary mechanism of language economy.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 金京勳, "現代國語 副詞語 硏究", 박사, 국어학, pp.1996
  2. 박재연, "한국어 양태 어미 연구" (2006), 태학사
  3. 박진호, "시제, 상, 양태", 國語學, (60), pp.289~322 (2011), 국어학회[DOI]
  4. 박진호, "韓國語에서 證據性이나 意外性의 의미성분을 포함하는 문법요소", 언어와 정보 사회, 15, pp.1~25 (2011), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  5. 손남익, "국어 부사 연구" (1995), 박이정
  6. 송재목, "인식양태와 증거성", 한국어학, 44, pp.27~53 (2009), 한국어학회
  7. 송재목, "의외성(mirative)에 대하여: 독립된 문법범주 설정의 문제점을 중심으로", 언어, 41(4), pp.593~617 (2016), 한국언어학회[DOI]
  8. 시정곤, "국어의 부정극어에 대한 연구", 국어국문학, 119 (1997), 국어국문학회
  9. 왕문용, "국어 문법론의 이해" (1993), 개문사
  10. 이재영, "부정극어와 부정어", 언어, 29(1), pp.107~120 (2004), 한국언어학회
  11. 임유종, "국어 부사의 하위 분류", 어학연구, 34 (1998), 서울대학교 언어교육원
  12. 임유종, "부정 표현과 호응하는 부사의 사용 양상과 한국어 교육", 한민족문화연구, (20), pp.187~214 (2007), 한민족문화학회[DOI]
  13. 장경희, "현대국어의 양태 범주 연구" (1985), 탑출판사
  14. 張英熙, "현대 국어 話式副詞의 의미 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.1995
  15. 陈翕贤, "语义地图模型在对外汉语教学词义辨析中的应用", 硕士, pp.2021
  16. “预期”范畴研究, "陈振宇", 复旦大学暑期FIST课程讲义, ~ (2021)
  17. 陈振宇, "强化语力对间接言语行为的触发功能--以疑问和祈使为例", 东方语言学, (1) (2021)
  18. 李善熙, "汉语“主观量”的表达研究", 博士, pp.2003
  19. 刘彬, "疑问和否定的相通性及其条件与机制", 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (3) (2022)
  20. 刘丹青, "语言类型学" (2017), 中西书局
  21. 陆方喆, "现代汉语反预期标记研究" (2017), 中国社会科学出版社
  22. 陆方喆, "论预期语言学的构建:理论假设、核心概念与研究价值", 关东学刊, (6) (2022)
  23. 孟艳华, "副词“到底”的偏误语义地图模型研究", 华文教学与研究, (1) (2022)
  24. 沈家煊, "语言的“主观性”和“主观化”", 外语教学与研究, (4) (2001)
  25. 孙杏丽, "语气副词“到底”的多角度研究", 硕士, pp.2010
  26. 吴福祥, "试说"X不比Y·Z"的语用功能", 中国语文, (3) (2004)
  27. 武远佳, "副词“到底”的语法化", 辽东学院学报(社会科学版), (1) (2021)
  28. 张耕, "现代汉语主观量的表达机制及其实现条件", 世界汉语教学, (2) (2022)
  29. 周玉品, "“到底”的语法化顺序与习得顺序考察", 复旦汉学论丛, (2) (2020)
  30. Heine Bernd, "Grammaticalization:A Conceptual Framework" (1991), University of Chicago Press
  31. Martin, J.R., "The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English" (2008), Palgrave Macmillan
  32. Sweetser, Eve., "From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure" (1990), Cambridge University Press
  33. Schwenter, Scott A., "Historical Pragmatics:Pragmatic Developments in the History of English" (1995), John Benjamins Publishing Company

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)