본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

韩汉语让步复句预期性实现的认知对比研究

A Cognitive Comparison study of the Expectation Realization of Concession Complex Sentences in Korean and Chinese

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

让步复句是韩汉语预期范畴实现的重要句法手段,但两种语言在让步复句的表达形式上有所不同,即在预期范畴的实现形式上存在认知层面的差异。本文主要以认知语法的入场理论为基础,对韩汉语不同让步复句类型:单项让步复句、选择让步复句、普适让步复句的预期性实现方式进行阐释对比,可以发现在让步复句的入场元素、时态入场元素、优先序列问题等方面的异同。借助入场理论我们可以对韩汉语让步复句的预期性实现方式有更进一步的认识,且对韩汉民族在认知思维层面存在的异同有进一步的理解。

Abstract

Concession complex sentences are an important syntactic method for the realization of expectation categories in Korean and Chinese, but the two languages differ in the expression form of concession complex sentences, that is, there are cognitive differences in the realization form of expectation categories. This paper is mainly based on the entry theory of cognitive grammar and compares the different types of concession complex sentences in Korean and Chinese: single concession complex sentences, selective concession complex sentences, and universal concession complex sentences. The similarities and differences in elements, temporal entry elements, priority sequence issues, etc., can be initially concluded. With the help of the entry theory, we can understand the expectation realization of the Korean and Chinese concession complex sentences and understand the similarities and differences between the Korean and Chinese nationalities in the cognitive aspect.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. 徐廷燮, "국어 양보문 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1991
  2. 안찬원, "현대한국어 연결어미에 대한 연구-의미기능을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2001
  3. 양인석, "한국어의 접속화", 어학연구, 8 (1972)
  4. 이기동, "대조·양보 접속어미에 대한 연구(Ⅰ)", 어학연구, (13) (1977)
  5. 이설, "한국어와 중국어 접속문의 표현 방식에 대한 대조 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.2006
  6. 최재희, "국어 종속 접속의 통사적 지위", 한글, (238) (1997)
  7. 白莲花, "韩语表示从属关系连接词尾与汉语对比研究", 硕士, pp.2007
  8. 陈振宇, "汉语的指称与命题" (2017), 上海人民出版社
  9. 陈振宇, "逻辑, 概率与地图分析" (2020), 复旦大学出版社
  10. 陈振宇, "预期范畴研究", 2021年复旦大学FIST课程讲义 (2021)
  11. 陈振宇, "预期的认知模型及有关类型--兼论与"竟然""偏偏"有关的一系列现象", 语言教学与研究, (5) (2021)
  12. 陈振宇, "语法研究和探索(十八)" (2016), 商务印书馆
  13. 郭志良, "现代汉语转折词语研究" (1999), 北京语言文化大学出版社
  14. 李雪华, "浅谈“对比”与“比较”的区别", 科教导刊, (10) (2012)
  15. 刘存伟, "认知语法基线", 阐释理论的应用, 意义与前景, 2019, pp.(2), ~
  16. 刘馨蔓, "英语现在进行体语义生成的认知机制研究", 现代外语, (4) (2021)
  17. 吴吉东, "入场理论框架中的英语关系分句认知识解", 外语学刊, (6) (2014)
  18. 吴吉东, "入场理论 : 架构, 运用及意蕴", 外国语文, (4) (2017)
  19. 吴吉东, "入场理论视域下英语复句认知及其教学研究", 博士, pp.2017
  20. 吴吉东, "入场理论视角下时间状语分句认知工作机制研究", 解放军外国语学院学报, (2) (2019)
  21. 吴吉东, "基于入场的名词性分句允准条件与认知机制", 西安外国语大学学报, (4) (2021)
  22. 吴吉东, "基于入场理论的汉英因果复句认知工作机制研究", 解放军外国语学院学报, (6) (2021)
  23. 完权, "入场理论 : 认知语法的新进展", 外国语(上海外国语大学学报), (6) (2009)
  24. 王春辉, "汉语的让步条件句", 语言科学, (2) (2013)
  25. 邢福义, "汉语复句研究" (2001), 商务印书馆
  26. 张靖宇, "入场理论框架下的英文关系分句探析——兼与吴吉龙、蔡龙权先生商", 常熟理工学院学报, (5) (2015)
  27. 张靖宇, "入场理论框架下的语篇研究——以扬州评话话本为例", 湖州师范学院学报, (9) (2018)
  28. Evans, V., "A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics" (2007), Edinburgh University Press Ltd
  29. Langacker, R. W., "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar : Descriptive Application Vol. 2" (1991), Standford University Press
  30. Langacker, R. W., "Concept, Image, and Symbol : The Cognitive Basis of Grammar" (1991), Mouton de Gruyter
  31. Langacker, R. W., "Cognitive Grammar : A Basic Introduction" (2008), Oxford University Press, Inc
  32. Langacker, R. W., "How to build an English clause", Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2 (2015)
  33. Langacker, R. W., "Ten Lectures on Cognitive Grammar : Dimensions of Elaboration" (2016), Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press
  34. Langacker, R. W., "Baseline and elaboration", Cognitive Linguistics, 3 (2016)
  35. Taylor, J. R., "ognitive Grammar" (2002), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)