본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

元和體와 西崑體에 관한 小考 ― 텍스트 마이닝 분석 기법의 접근

A Study on Yuan-he Style and Xi-kun Style-an approach based on the text-mining analysis

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper examines Tang Dynasty Yuan-he Style and Northern Song Dynasty Xi-kun Style from a lexical perspective. As the amount of texts analyzed for each style is huge and previous studies require a different approach to examine the texts analyzed by qualitative analysis, this study attempted a digital humanities approach. I attempted a quantitative approach through analysis based on n-gram analysis of representative text mining techniques, cosine similarity analysis using its results, TF-IDF figures, and topic modeling through LDA models. Based on the comparison of the frequency of single-letter unigrams and two-letter bigrams and their TF-IDF values, topic modeling, and other criteria, it was found that Yuan-he style frequently and heavily used casual vocabulary and people-related vocabulary, such as Ren(人) and Xin(心), which is related to the realistic features of Yuan-he style, which is socially participatory and people-oriented. The frequency of words related to splendour, such as yu(玉) and jim(金), was high in Xi-kun style, and words that do not appear in the top 500 bigram frequencies of ‘The Complete Song Poems’, were also high in Xi-kun style, such as Songyu(宋玉), Xiangru(相如), Handian(漢殿=漢宮), and Liangyuan(梁園=梁苑), were the most common. This shows that a poet's poetic background has a significant influence on the choice of vocabulary. On the other hand, based on the cosine similarity analysis, we found that the major poets of a school did not necessarily use similar vocabulary. Yuan-zhen and Bai-Juyi, two of the key poets of the Yuan-he style, were more than 30% similar in their vocabulary use. In contrast, no lexical connections were found between the three major Poets of the Xi-kun style, Yang-yi, Liu-yun and Qian-weiyan, which is a surprising conclusion. The statistics used in this article are obviously subject to error. However, we can argue that they are valuable in that they allow us to effectively analyze things that are not easily accessible to humans by hand.

Abstract

This paper examines Tang Dynasty Yuan-he Style and Northern Song Dynasty Xi-kun Style from a lexical perspective. As the amount of texts analyzed for each style is huge and previous studies require a different approach to examine the texts analyzed by qualitative analysis, this study attempted a digital humanities approach. I attempted a quantitative approach through analysis based on n-gram analysis of representative text mining techniques, cosine similarity analysis using its results, TF-IDF figures, and topic modeling through LDA models. Based on the comparison of the frequency of single-letter unigrams and two-letter bigrams and their TF-IDF values, topic modeling, and other criteria, it was found that Yuan-he style frequently and heavily used casual vocabulary and people-related vocabulary, such as Ren(人) and Xin(心), which is related to the realistic features of Yuan-he style, which is socially participatory and people-oriented. The frequency of words related to splendour, such as yu(玉) and jim(金), was high in Xi-kun style, and words that do not appear in the top 500 bigram frequencies of ‘The Complete Song Poems’, were also high in Xi-kun style, such as Songyu(宋玉), Xiangru(相如), Handian(漢殿=漢宮), and Liangyuan(梁園=梁苑), were the most common. This shows that a poet's poetic background has a significant influence on the choice of vocabulary. On the other hand, based on the cosine similarity analysis, we found that the major poets of a school did not necessarily use similar vocabulary. Yuan-zhen and Bai-Juyi, two of the key poets of the Yuan-he style, were more than 30% similar in their vocabulary use. In contrast, no lexical connections were found between the three major Poets of the Xi-kun style, Yang-yi, Liu-yun and Qian-weiyan, which is a surprising conclusion. The statistics used in this article are obviously subject to error. However, we can argue that they are valuable in that they allow us to effectively analyze things that are not easily accessible to humans by hand.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 白高來, "白居易·元稹·劉禹錫唱和詩編年集" (2009), 白山出版社
  2. 陳寅恪, "元白詩箋證稿" (1958), 古典文學出版社
  3. 巩本棟, "唱和詩詞硏究-以唐宋爲中心" (2013), 中華書局
  4. 蘇仲翔, "元白詩選注" (2009), 中州書畵社
  5. 박민정, "북송 서곤체 시 연구", 박사, 중어중문학, pp.2011
  6. 강필임, "中唐의 文人詩會", 中語中文學, 69 (2017)
  7. 김준연, "당대시인의 사회 연결망 분석(1)-社交詩에 대한 빅데이터와 인포그래픽 기반의 접근", 中國學報, 82 (2017)
  8. 김준연, "중국 고대의‘사랑’ 개념과 사랑시의 주제-先秦에서 唐代까지의 사랑시를 중심으로", 中國語文論叢, 111 (2022)
  9. 김준연, "바이그램(bigram) 분석을 통한 ≪전당시≫상용 어휘 연구", 中國文學, 118 (2024)
  10. 김학주, "元和體’詩의 文學史上의 意義", 중국어문학, 29 (1997)
  11. 이병찬, "한시 유사도 분석 방안 연구", 漢文學論集, 59 (2021)
  12. 전가람, "멀리서읽는 중국 고전시가-왕유와 맹호연을중심으로", 中國語文學誌, 80 (2022)
  13. 胡俊峰, "唐宋詩之計算機輔助深層硏究", 北京大學學報(自然科學版), (5) (2001)
  14. 趙樂, "元白唱和詩硏究", 北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版), 46 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)