韓․中僧傳의 神異的 敍事方式 比較 - 『高僧傳』과 『三國遺事』를 중심으로
A comparative study on ways of shinyi(supernatural) descriptions between Korean and Chinese biographies of monks
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As prosperity of Christianity in the western world lead to the biographies of numerous saints, or Biography of the Saint, who contributed to the development of Christianity, and such biographies influenced on the heroic narrative literature in the Early and Middle Ages, as Indian Buddhism proliferated to the eastern world, biographies of monks who contributed to the development of Buddhism, or Biography of Monks, deeply influenced the development of eastern ancient literature. Therefore it is worth to compare between “Gaosengzhuan” which is the oldest anthology of biographies of Chinese revered monks today and “Samgukyusa”, though the latter is not an anthology of biographies of monks in itself, but that includes many biography of monks. Although dates of writing and locations of appearance of two books are different, there are common elements in descriptive ways, especially among them, Shenyipian of “Gaosengzhuan” and chapter of Shin-ju and Eui-hae of “Samgukyusa” are similar. That is, authors all described biographies of monk in “supernatural description style”. Then what made them to choose that description style? It is because supernatural capabilities of several monks in the initial stage of introduction of Buddhism mainly influenced the introduction and the development of Buddhism. For the proliferation and the development of Buddhism, support of the lord was essentially needed, and thanks to supernatural and miraculous works of monks, they gained trust of the lord, and were able to expand political power and to consolidate position of Buddhism. Especially, there are many supernatural stories of monks who demonstrated supernatural power of themselves in front of high ranking nobles such as emperors or ministers who could influence politics. It seems that they were trying to emphasize political and ideological status of Buddhism in Buddhist monastery. In addition, because there were little literatures on monks in biographies of formal history, they had to use miraculous stories or religious stories as materials in the process of collection of materials, rather than formal history.
Abstract
As prosperity of Christianity in the western world lead to the biographies of numerous saints, or Biography of the Saint, who contributed to the development of Christianity, and such biographies influenced on the heroic narrative literature in the Early and Middle Ages, as Indian Buddhism proliferated to the eastern world, biographies of monks who contributed to the development of Buddhism, or Biography of Monks, deeply influenced the development of eastern ancient literature. Therefore it is worth to compare between “Gaosengzhuan” which is the oldest anthology of biographies of Chinese revered monks today and “Samgukyusa”, though the latter is not an anthology of biographies of monks in itself, but that includes many biography of monks. Although dates of writing and locations of appearance of two books are different, there are common elements in descriptive ways, especially among them, Shenyipian of “Gaosengzhuan” and chapter of Shin-ju and Eui-hae of “Samgukyusa” are similar. That is, authors all described biographies of monk in “supernatural description style”. Then what made them to choose that description style? It is because supernatural capabilities of several monks in the initial stage of introduction of Buddhism mainly influenced the introduction and the development of Buddhism. For the proliferation and the development of Buddhism, support of the lord was essentially needed, and thanks to supernatural and miraculous works of monks, they gained trust of the lord, and were able to expand political power and to consolidate position of Buddhism. Especially, there are many supernatural stories of monks who demonstrated supernatural power of themselves in front of high ranking nobles such as emperors or ministers who could influence politics. It seems that they were trying to emphasize political and ideological status of Buddhism in Buddhist monastery. In addition, because there were little literatures on monks in biographies of formal history, they had to use miraculous stories or religious stories as materials in the process of collection of materials, rather than formal history.
참고문헌 (19)
- 강인구, "譯註三國遺事" (2002), 以會文化社
- 김승호, "韓國僧傳文學의 硏究" (1992), 民族社
- 문명재, "세계문학의 기원" (2001), 한울 아카데미
- 변귀남, "?高僧傳?의 志怪的 敍事形式 小考", 중국학보, 47, pp.249~268 (2003), 한국중국학회
- 이범교, "삼국유사의 종합적 해석" (2005), 민족사
- 이정훈, "『삼국유사三國遺事』 의해義解의 성격 고찰 - 중국中國 『고승전高僧傳』과의 비교를 통하여-", 한국문학이론과 비평, 12(4), pp.123~144 (2008), 한국문학이론과비평학회
- 조동일, "한국의 高僧傳에서 세계의 聖者傳으로", 관악어문연구, 21 (1996), 서울대 국어국문학과
- 조수학, "재구성 수이전" (2001), 국학자료원
- 道宣, , 東國譯經院, ~ (1997)
- 民族文化推進會, "三國遺事" (1977), 景仁文化社
- 王靑, "魏晉南北朝時期的佛敎信仰與神話" (2001), 中國社會科學出版社
- 이영석, "『高僧傳』神異編에 관한 연구", 중국사연구, (58), pp.51~83 (2009), 중국사학회
- 任繼愈, "中國佛敎史" (1993), 社會科學出版社
- 丁天求, "韓․中․日 高僧傳의 比較", 동아시아 비교문화, 1 (2000)
- 蔡尙植, "高麗後期佛敎史硏究" (1996), 일조각
- 蔡尙植, "普覺國尊一然에 관한 硏究 In: 一然과 三國遺事논집" (1992), 중앙승가대학 불교학연구소
- 河廷鉉, "삼국유사텍스트에 반영된 ‘神異’개념에 관한 연구", 박사, 종교학과, pp.2003
- 慧皎, "高僧傳" (1993), 中華書局
- 慧皎, "新譯高僧傳" (2005), 三民書局
