본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『삼국유사三國遺事』 의해義解의 성격 고찰 - 중국中國 『고승전高僧傳』과의 비교를 통하여-

The comparison between Samgukusa and Gosunggen - focused on the category of Uhae/Yijie

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is the comparison with Some monk's tales in Samgukusa that collected in Chinese monks story, Gosunggen at the same time. According to earlier studies, many scholars tried to make clear about the relativity of Samgukusa and Gosunggen but their approaches had some limitation that caused by insufficient concrete examples. Therefore In this paper, I tired to select 3 appropriate monks. The reason I choose These 3 monks is that they are all mentioned in the category of Uhae/Yijie in Samgukusa that is same name in Gosunggen. I made some Motifemes that showed us theirs story's similarity and dissimilarity. After this comparison, I concluded that the structure of these monks tales are not same. Although these monks tale collected by the same category, the meaning of tales are different. To speak details, 3 monks keep just one role in Gosungen. For instance, Wonhuy and Usang is just a exegete but In Samgukusa, their characters transformed dramatically through editor's intention. And to conclude, The category of Uhae in Samgukusa edited by editior's intentions that demonstraed some kind of new interpretation in monk's tale.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is the comparison with Some monk's tales in Samgukusa that collected in Chinese monks story, Gosunggen at the same time. According to earlier studies, many scholars tried to make clear about the relativity of Samgukusa and Gosunggen but their approaches had some limitation that caused by insufficient concrete examples. Therefore In this paper, I tired to select 3 appropriate monks. The reason I choose These 3 monks is that they are all mentioned in the category of Uhae/Yijie in Samgukusa that is same name in Gosunggen. I made some Motifemes that showed us theirs story's similarity and dissimilarity. After this comparison, I concluded that the structure of these monks tales are not same. Although these monks tale collected by the same category, the meaning of tales are different. To speak details, 3 monks keep just one role in Gosungen. For instance, Wonhuy and Usang is just a exegete but In Samgukusa, their characters transformed dramatically through editor's intention. And to conclude, The category of Uhae in Samgukusa edited by editior's intentions that demonstraed some kind of new interpretation in monk's tale.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. 고운기, "우리가 정말 알아야 할 삼국유사2" (2002), 현암사
  2. 김영태, "삼국시대 불교신앙연구" (1990), 불광출판부
  3. 박진태, "삼국유사의 종합적 연구" (2002), 박이정
  4. 송효섭, "삼국유사 설화의 기호학" (1990), 일조각
  5. 이도흠, "화쟁기호학,이론과 실제" (1999), 한양대학교 출판부
  6. 이도흠, "신라인의 마음으로 삼국유사를 읽는다" (2000), 푸른역사
  7. 이병욱, "고려시대의 불교사상" (2002), 혜안
  8. 이소라, "삼국유사의 서술방식 연구" (2005), 제이엔씨
  9. 하정룡, "삼국유사 사료비판" (2005), 민족사
  10. 허흥식, "고려불교사연구" (1996), 일조각
  11. 홍윤식, "삼국유사와 한국고대문화" (1985), 원광대학교 출판국
  12. 도안, "속고승전 1-3" (1997), 동국역경원
  13. 일연, "삼국유사" (1994), 신서원
  14. 혜교, "고승전 외" (1997), 동국역경원
  15. 찬영, "『송고승전』上 ·下" (1987), 중화서국
  16. 고익진, "「삼국유사 찬술고」,『삼국유사연구론선집1』" (1986), 백산자료원
  17. 김영태, "삼국유사의 체재와 그 성격", 논문집, 13 (1974), 동국대학교 불교대학
  18. 김홍철, "송고승전소재 의상전-선묘설화를 중심으로", 인문과학논집, 3 (1984), 청주대학교 인문과학 연구소
  19. 이도흠, "삼국유사의 구조분석과 의미 해석", 한국학논집, 26 (1995), 한양대학교 한국학연구소
  20. 전동혁, "밀교의 수용과 그것의 한국적 전개(2)", 中央增伽大學論文集, 4 (1995), 중앙승가대학
  21. 정병삼, "의상 전기의 제 문제", 韓國學硏究, 1 (1991), 숙명여자대학교
  22. 정천구, "삼국유사와 중,일 불교전기문 학의비교연구", 박사, pp.2000
  23. 정출헌, "삼국유사 소재설화의 세계관에 대한 고찰", 어문논집, 28(1) (1989), 안암어문학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)