‘文心’과 ‘通變’― 錢鍾書 초기 중국고전문학 비평 연구
The Classical Literary Mind and General Change: A Study on the Former Chinese Classical Literature Criticism of Qian Zhongshu
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper focused on two key words, namely literary mind and general change, tried to discuss Qian Zhongshu’ early literary criticism from two parts: the view of Classical Chinese and the critique of Chinese Classical Literature. First of all, Qian Zhongshu concentrated on research poetly mind and literary mind to the common humanity in his literary researches, it is reflected in the literature across the ages and in all countries of the world. More specifically, the poetly mind means poetic inspiration, it is in the realm of subjectivity, while the literary mind means that it is the workings of the human mind. In other words, it reaches forward to the criticism for the subject of the creation and the critical subject. In addition to literary mind, Qian Zhongshu inherited the tradition of Chinese literature, including traditional literature type, tradition of the history of Spanish literature. At the same time, he used dialectical thinking and tried to discuss the possibility of criticism. According to this point, I think that two key words will be useful to study Qian Zhongshu’s early literary criticism. Because it provide much more information about Qian Zhongshu’s the view of Classical Chinese and the critique of Chinese Classical Literature. Furthermore, it can help us to understand Qian Zhongshu’s passion for Chinese classical literature as well as his academic interest in Western literature, philosophy, psychology, and rhetoric, etc. I think it is provided new methodology and insight into Qian Zhongshu’s Qian’s literary criticism.
Abstract
This paper focused on two key words, namely literary mind and general change, tried to discuss Qian Zhongshu’ early literary criticism from two parts: the view of Classical Chinese and the critique of Chinese Classical Literature. First of all, Qian Zhongshu concentrated on research poetly mind and literary mind to the common humanity in his literary researches, it is reflected in the literature across the ages and in all countries of the world. More specifically, the poetly mind means poetic inspiration, it is in the realm of subjectivity, while the literary mind means that it is the workings of the human mind. In other words, it reaches forward to the criticism for the subject of the creation and the critical subject. In addition to literary mind, Qian Zhongshu inherited the tradition of Chinese literature, including traditional literature type, tradition of the history of Spanish literature. At the same time, he used dialectical thinking and tried to discuss the possibility of criticism. According to this point, I think that two key words will be useful to study Qian Zhongshu’s early literary criticism. Because it provide much more information about Qian Zhongshu’s the view of Classical Chinese and the critique of Chinese Classical Literature. Furthermore, it can help us to understand Qian Zhongshu’s passion for Chinese classical literature as well as his academic interest in Western literature, philosophy, psychology, and rhetoric, etc. I think it is provided new methodology and insight into Qian Zhongshu’s Qian’s literary criticism.
참고문헌 (23)
- 錢鍾書, "錢鍾書散文" (1997), 浙江文藝出版社
- 錢鍾書, "寫在人生邊上⋅人生邊上的邊上⋅石語" (2002), 三聯書店
- 錢鍾書, "七綴集(修訂本)" (1994), 上海古籍出版社
- 錢鍾書, "槐聚詩存" (1995), 三聯書店
- 錢鍾書, "钱鍾书英文文集" (2005), 外語敎學與硏究出版社
- 錢鍾書, "錢鍾書論學文選(共六卷)" (1990), 花城出版社
- 錢基博, "现代中国文学史" (1986), 岳麓书社
- 高平叔, "蔡元培全集 第三卷" (1984), 中华书局出版社
- 胡先骕, "胡先骕文存 上卷" (1995), 江西高校出版社
- 胡適, "胡適文集 2" (1998), 北京大学出版社
- 胡適, "胡適文集 8" (1998), 北京大学出版社
- 朱自清, "朱自清全集 第四卷" (1990), 江苏教育出版社
- 司马长风, "中國新文學史 下卷" (1978), 昭明出版社
- 张文江, "营造巴比塔的智者――钱锺书传" (1993), 上海文艺出版社
- 田蕙兰, "钱鍾书杨绛研究资料集" (1997), 华中師範大學出版社
- 홍석표, "현대중국, 단절과 연속" (2005), 선학사
- 田建民, "錢鍾書早期衡文觀硏究", 河北學刊, (2) (1998)
- 陈平原, "现代中国的述学文體──以“引经據典”为中心", 文學評論, (04) (2001)
- 陈平原, "分裂的趣味與抵抗的立場——鲁迅的述学文體及其接受", 文學評論, (05) (2005)
- 罗新河, "感应與转型——论钱鍾书学术演进历程", 湖南工业大学学报, (06) (2015)
- 류준필, "‘文言ㆍ白話’를 넘어서 ―근대 중국에서 ‘국어’ 문제", 중국현대문학, (36), pp.163~207 (2006), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 한지연, "錢鍾書의 비평적 글쓰기와 『管錐編』 연구를 위한 小考", 중국현대문학, (67), pp.33~74 (2013), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 한지연, "통섭의 시학 - 錢鍾書 『詩可以怨』의 비교문학적 접근", 한중언어문화연구, (42), pp.475~500 (2016), 한국중국언어문화연구회[DOI]
