錢鍾書<談藝錄>에 나타난 비평의식 - 第一則 「詩分唐宋」을 중심으로
A Study on the critic’s idea and its value of On the art of Poetry談藝錄 written by Qian Zhongshu錢鍾書 - In Terms of "The poem is divided in TangSong Dynasty"
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was performed to study on the value of On the art of Poetry談藝錄 written by Qian Zhongshu錢鍾書. Qian Zhongshu is based on his literary sensibility, academic background and critical thinking, he against the use of theory in Chinese literature discourse, and tried to discuss TangSong唐宋 poetry in a view point of writing style. Although both sides are different with each other, in other words, Song poetry succeed to Tang literature, it has completed its style of new poetry. Therefore, Qian tried to merge the ancient and modern, the Chinese and Western canons, include TangSong Dynasty's notes on classical poetry. Qian's On the art of Poetry solved the ambiguity problem between appreciation and criticism of Chinese classical literature, it is apparent from his ability to observe and critical thinking, also he is faithful to the original and explored a theory of literature. I think Qian's On the art of Poetry will provide new insight into Qian's academic achievement, include many faces of theory in Chinese and Western literature.
Abstract
This study was performed to study on the value of On the art of Poetry談藝錄 written by Qian Zhongshu錢鍾書. Qian Zhongshu is based on his literary sensibility, academic background and critical thinking, he against the use of theory in Chinese literature discourse, and tried to discuss TangSong唐宋 poetry in a view point of writing style. Although both sides are different with each other, in other words, Song poetry succeed to Tang literature, it has completed its style of new poetry. Therefore, Qian tried to merge the ancient and modern, the Chinese and Western canons, include TangSong Dynasty's notes on classical poetry. Qian's On the art of Poetry solved the ambiguity problem between appreciation and criticism of Chinese classical literature, it is apparent from his ability to observe and critical thinking, also he is faithful to the original and explored a theory of literature. I think Qian's On the art of Poetry will provide new insight into Qian's academic achievement, include many faces of theory in Chinese and Western literature.
참고문헌 (41)
- "開明書店初版新書三十七年四五六月份欄目", 國文月刊, (70) (1948)
- 錢鍾書, "中國固有的文學批評的一個特點", 文学雜誌, 1(4) (1937)
- 錢鍾書, "宋詩選註" (1958), 人民文學出版社
- 錢鍾書, "管錐編" (1979), 中華書局
- 錢鍾書, "談藝錄" (1984), 中華書局
- 錢鍾書, "七綴集" (1994), 上海古籍出版社
- 錢鍾書, "槐聚詩存" (1995), 三聯書店
- 錢鍾書, "錢鍾書散文" (1997), 浙江文藝出版社
- 錢鍾書, "錢鍾書手稿集․容安館札記" (2003), 商務印書館
- 錢鍾書, "宋詩選註" (2010), 역락
- 錢基博, "讀清人集别錄", 光華大學半月刊, 4(6) (1936)
- 黄宗羲, "黄宗羲詩文選" (1990), 華東師範大學出版社
- 楊絳, "幹校六記" (1981), 三聯書店
- 朱光潜, "朱光潜全集․第三卷" (1987), 安徽教育出版社
- 陳子謙, "錢學論" (1992), 四川文藝出版社
- 陳子謙, "論錢鍾書" (2005), 廣西師範大學出版社
- 東亞出版人會議, "東亞人文100導讀" (2010), 四川敎育出版社
- 東亞出版人會議, "東亞人文100導讀" (2011), 聯經
- 胡志德, "錢鍾書" (1990), 中國廣播電視出版社
- 李勇, "流淌的人文情懷: 近現代名人墨記: 續" (2013), 東方出版中心
- 陸文虎, "“圍城”内外: 錢鍾書的文學世界" (1992), 解放軍文藝出版社
- 樂黛雲, "比較文學與比較文化十講" (2004), 復旦大學出版社
- 張文江, "營造巴比塔的智者: 錢鍾書傳" (1993), 上海文藝出版社
- 趙景深, "文壇憶舊" (1983), 上海書店出版社
- 鄭朝宗, "｢管錐編｣硏究論文" (1984), 福建人民出版社
- 中國社會科學院訪美代表團, "訪美觀感" (1979), 中國社會科學出版社
- 周振甫, "詩詞例話" (1962), 中國靑年出版社
- 周振甫, "周振甫講｢管錐編｣｢談藝錄｣" (2005), 江蘇敎育出版社
- 동아시아출판인회의 기획, "동아시아 책의 사상 책의 힘: 동아시아 100권의 인문도서를 읽는다" (2010), 한길사
- 荒井健, "『圍城』周圍之七――錢鍾書書信九通", 飇風, (37) (2003), 日本飇風會
- 王家俊, "錢鍾書堂弟錢鍾韓敎授訪談――我們怎樣紀念錢鍾書", 揚子晚報 (1999)
- 李鴻鎭, "『談藝錄』飜譯(1)", 중국어문학, 16 (1989), 영남중국어문학회
- 李鴻鎭, "『談藝錄』飜譯｣(2)", 중국어문학, 17 (1990), 영남중국어문학회
- 李鴻鎭, "『談藝錄』飜譯(7)", 중국어문학, 21 (1993), 영남중국어문학회
- 李鴻鎭, "『談藝錄』飜譯(8)", 중국어문학, 22 (1993), 영남중국어문학회
- 李鴻鎭, "『談藝錄』飜譯(13)", 중국어문학, 29 (1997), 영남중국어문학회
- 李鴻鎭, "『談藝錄』飜譯(15)", 중국어문학, 31 (1998), 영남중국어문학회
- 李鴻鎭, "『談藝錄』飜譯(18)", 중국어문학, 34 (1999), 영남중국어문학회
- 莫礪鋒, "唐宋詩의 공통점과 차이점", 한민족어문학, 31 (1997), 한민족어문학회
- 韓知延, "錢鍾書: “文”與“學”之間 (1929-1949)", 박사, pp.2013
- 한지연, "錢鍾書의 비평적 글쓰기와 『管錐編』 연구를 위한 小考", 중국현대문학, (67), pp.33~74 (2013), 한국중국현대문학학회