통섭의 시학 - 錢鍾書 『詩可以怨』의 비교문학적 접근
The Poetry of consilience - A Comparative Literary Approach of Qian Zhongshu錢鍾書’s “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness詩可以怨”
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The theory that “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” is very important in Chinese ancient literary criticism, and the research is one of hot debate in ancient literature. The so-called “The anger the poet”, By Confucius孔子 “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” to Sima Qian司馬遷 “Out of Indignation Comes Writing”, and Han Yu韓愈’s “Injustice Provokes Outcry”, including the tragedy theories of Western Literature etc, makes it developed into ancient Chinese literary theories of a traditional system. This paper was performed to study of Poems Emblem Plaintiveness詩可以怨 written by Qian Zhongshu錢鍾書 and its implications. Specifically, this paper writing for “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” of the formation, theoretical meaning and function are discussed and studied, strive for comprehensive and multi angle for “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” have a clear understanding. Based on this point, This paper is consisted of foreword, two body chapters, conclusion and the references. Chapter one gave an introduction to this paper and reviewed the former research. On the basis of previous studies, in Chapter two, tried to discuss about the implication of Poems Emblem Plaintiveness. From ancient times to the present, Poems of pain and sorrow is a really ancient activity wherever in China or the west, Qian’s tried to seek the internal meaning of “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” and the individual ideal, he also found there some common ground, which means that the literary mind and the heart of poetry. Chapter three used in theory of hermeneutic to read and analyze Poems Emblem Plaintiveness. As to Qian Zhongshu, it was not only a way of his scholarly expression, but also a method of communicate with tradition. For this reason, Qian was based on ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign, through the hermeneutics circle, and looked for meaning of “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness”. This academic practice of Qian Zhongshu could ultimately see a deepening and expansion of the consciousness for Chinese literature. Because in academic life Qian Zhongshu of Chinese literature always there was some sort of theme he needed. Between Chinese Literature and Western Literature, Qian used in the theory of merging, tried to solve the fundamental problem of Chinese literature and literary theory. I think Qian’s Poems Emblem Plaintiveness will provide new insight into Qian’s academic achievement, include many faces of theory in Chinese and Western literature.
Abstract
The theory that “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” is very important in Chinese ancient literary criticism, and the research is one of hot debate in ancient literature. The so-called “The anger the poet”, By Confucius孔子 “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” to Sima Qian司馬遷 “Out of Indignation Comes Writing”, and Han Yu韓愈’s “Injustice Provokes Outcry”, including the tragedy theories of Western Literature etc, makes it developed into ancient Chinese literary theories of a traditional system. This paper was performed to study of Poems Emblem Plaintiveness詩可以怨 written by Qian Zhongshu錢鍾書 and its implications. Specifically, this paper writing for “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” of the formation, theoretical meaning and function are discussed and studied, strive for comprehensive and multi angle for “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” have a clear understanding. Based on this point, This paper is consisted of foreword, two body chapters, conclusion and the references. Chapter one gave an introduction to this paper and reviewed the former research. On the basis of previous studies, in Chapter two, tried to discuss about the implication of Poems Emblem Plaintiveness. From ancient times to the present, Poems of pain and sorrow is a really ancient activity wherever in China or the west, Qian’s tried to seek the internal meaning of “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness” and the individual ideal, he also found there some common ground, which means that the literary mind and the heart of poetry. Chapter three used in theory of hermeneutic to read and analyze Poems Emblem Plaintiveness. As to Qian Zhongshu, it was not only a way of his scholarly expression, but also a method of communicate with tradition. For this reason, Qian was based on ancient and modern, Chinese and foreign, through the hermeneutics circle, and looked for meaning of “Poems Emblem Plaintiveness”. This academic practice of Qian Zhongshu could ultimately see a deepening and expansion of the consciousness for Chinese literature. Because in academic life Qian Zhongshu of Chinese literature always there was some sort of theme he needed. Between Chinese Literature and Western Literature, Qian used in the theory of merging, tried to solve the fundamental problem of Chinese literature and literary theory. I think Qian’s Poems Emblem Plaintiveness will provide new insight into Qian’s academic achievement, include many faces of theory in Chinese and Western literature.
참고문헌 (30)
- 錢鍾書, "管錐編" (1979), 中華書局
- 錢鍾書, "談藝錄(補訂本)" (1984), 中華書局
- 錢鍾書, "七綴集(修訂本)" (1994), 上海古籍出版社
- 錢鍾書, "錢鍾書英文文集" (2005), 外語敎學與硏究出版社
- 中國社會科學院訪美代表團著, "訪美觀感" (1979), 中國社會科學出版社
- 北京師範大學中文系比較文學研究組選, "比較文學研究資料" (1986), 北京師範大學出版社
- 陳子謙, "錢學論" (1992), 四川文藝出版社
- 游國恩, "中國文學史 (一)" (2002), 人民文學出版社
- 季進著, "錢鍾書與現代西學" (2002), 三聯書店
- 傅道彬, "詩可以觀: 禮樂文化與周代詩學精神" (2003), 中華書局
- 鍾嶸著, "詩品」譯註" (2006), 江蘇教育出版社
- 樂黛雲, "比較文學與比較文化十講" (2004), 復旦大學出版社
- 汪榮祖, "槐聚心史: 錢鍾書的自我及其微世界" (2014), 國立臺灣大學出版中心
- 마르틴 하이데거, "존재와 시간" (1998), 까치글방
- 장파, "동양과 서양, 그리고 미학" (1999), 푸른숲
- 김병옥, "도이치문학 용어사전" (2001), 서울대학교 출판부
- 이브 슈브렐, "비교문학, 어떻게 할 것인가" (2002), 민음사
- 빌헬름 딜타이, "해석학의 탄생" (2011), 지만지
- 리차드 팔머, "해석학이란 무엇인가" (2011), 문예출판사
- 한스게오르크 가다머, "진리와 방법1" (2012), 문학동네
- 한스게오르크 가다머, "진리와 방법2" (2012), 문학동네
- 안대희, "궁극의 시학" (2013), 문학동네
- 傅道彬, "“詩可以怨”嗎?", 文藝研究, (11) (2007)
- 高旭東, "論錢鍾書 『詩可以怨』的合理性及其限度", 復旦大學學報, (4) (2011)
- 韓知延, "錢鍾書: “文”與“學”之間(1929-1949)", 박사, pp.2013
- 김동규, "니체 철학에서의 고통과 비극 - 문화철학의 관점에서", 철학탐구, 26, pp.139~168 (2009), 중앙철학연구소
- 김수경, "朝鮮時代 『詩經』 인식에서의 詩可以怨과 溫柔敦厚", 한국한문학연구, (52), pp.379~429 (2013), 한국한문학회
- 이영섭, "슬픔에 대한 중국문학과 서양문학의 문화적인 공감과 소통 ― 錢鍾書의 <詩可以怨> 解題와 譯註", 중국어문논역총간, (35), pp.403~436 (2014), 중국어문논역학회
- 한지연, "錢鍾書의 비평적 글쓰기와 『管錐編』 연구를 위한 小考", 중국현대문학, (67), pp.33~74 (2013), 한국중국현대문학학회
- 한지연, "錢鍾書<談藝錄>에 나타난 비평의식 - 第一則 「詩分唐宋」을 중심으로", 중국학연구, (70), pp.69~91 (2014), 중국학연구회
