본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

周作人, 錢鍾書의 文學史的 논쟁과 그 의의 - 『中國新文學的源流』를 둘러싼 인식론적 차이를 중심으로 -

The argument between Zhou Zuoren and Qian Zhongshu on the History of Chinese Literature and its implications: A research of The origin of Chinese New Literature

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This paper was performed to study of The origin of Chinese New Literature中國新文學的源流 by Zhou Zuoren周作人’s theory of literature history, and a argument of Chinese New Literary History with Qian Zhongshu錢鍾書’s negative reviews about the origin of Chinese New Literature. Based on this point, This paper is consisted of foreword, two body chapters, conclusion and the references. Chapter one gave an introduction to this paper and reviewed the former research. On the basis of previous studies, in Chapter two, tried to discuss about the viewpoint of Zhou’s The origin of Chinese New Literature. As everyone knows that ideals言志 and moral載道 are two important concepts in the history of Chinese Literature, Zhou was traced back to the end of the Ming dynasty and mainly intended to indicate the mainstream of Chinese Literature, For this reason, Zhou’s The origin of Chinese New Literature has significant implications, which is the important thing about the origin of Chinese New Literature, which intellectual aspirations have been directly reflected in his writing. In Chapter three, tried to analyze about the viewpoint of Qian Zhongshu’s review on Zhou’s The origin of Chinese New Literature. Analysis showed that Qian through his literary criticism, tried to clarify the problem of the Chinese New Literature, even previous literary criticism. Thus, and tried to clear the difference from Zhou’s viewpoint of literature. I think it is not as the object of Chinese literary criticism, but as a theoretical basis for the criticism, to break through to the other side, Qian Zhongshu who tries to find new and efficient ways to do that work. By comparison, Zhou Zuoren & Qian Zhongshu used their so-called academic literacy, tried to approach a subject from the literary and scholarly point of view. I think the argument between Zhou Zuoren & Qian Zhongshu on the History of Chinese Literature provided new insight into their academic achievement, include many faces of theory and criticism in the study of Chinese New Literature.

Abstract

This paper was performed to study of The origin of Chinese New Literature中國新文學的源流 by Zhou Zuoren周作人’s theory of literature history, and a argument of Chinese New Literary History with Qian Zhongshu錢鍾書’s negative reviews about the origin of Chinese New Literature. Based on this point, This paper is consisted of foreword, two body chapters, conclusion and the references. Chapter one gave an introduction to this paper and reviewed the former research. On the basis of previous studies, in Chapter two, tried to discuss about the viewpoint of Zhou’s The origin of Chinese New Literature. As everyone knows that ideals言志 and moral載道 are two important concepts in the history of Chinese Literature, Zhou was traced back to the end of the Ming dynasty and mainly intended to indicate the mainstream of Chinese Literature, For this reason, Zhou’s The origin of Chinese New Literature has significant implications, which is the important thing about the origin of Chinese New Literature, which intellectual aspirations have been directly reflected in his writing. In Chapter three, tried to analyze about the viewpoint of Qian Zhongshu’s review on Zhou’s The origin of Chinese New Literature. Analysis showed that Qian through his literary criticism, tried to clarify the problem of the Chinese New Literature, even previous literary criticism. Thus, and tried to clear the difference from Zhou’s viewpoint of literature. I think it is not as the object of Chinese literary criticism, but as a theoretical basis for the criticism, to break through to the other side, Qian Zhongshu who tries to find new and efficient ways to do that work. By comparison, Zhou Zuoren & Qian Zhongshu used their so-called academic literacy, tried to approach a subject from the literary and scholarly point of view. I think the argument between Zhou Zuoren & Qian Zhongshu on the History of Chinese Literature provided new insight into their academic achievement, include many faces of theory and criticism in the study of Chinese New Literature.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. 周作人, "中国新文学的源流" (1995), 华东師範大學出版社
  2. 周作人, "中國新文學大系․散文一集" (2003), 上海文藝出版社
  3. 止庵, "周作人自編文集․藥堂雜文" (2002), 河北敎育出版社
  4. 鍾叔河, "周作人文選(1898-1929)" (1995), 廣州出版社
  5. 鍾叔河, "周作人文選(1930-1936)" (1995), 廣州出版社
  6. 鍾叔河, "周作人文選(1937-1944)" (1995), 廣州出版社
  7. 鍾叔河, "周作人文類編․本色" (1998), 湖南文藝出版社
  8. 胡適, "中國新文學大系․建設理論集" (2003), 上海文藝出版社
  9. 江盈科, "江盈科集 (一)" (2008), 岳麓書社
  10. 錢基博, "現代中國文學史" (1986), 岳麓書社
  11. 錢鍾書, "寫在人生邊上․人生边上的边上․石语" (2002), 三聯書店
  12. 錢鍾書, "七綴集" (2002), 三聯書店
  13. 朱自淸, "詩言志辨" (2004), 廣西師範大學出版社
  14. 쑨위, "루쉰과 저우쭈어런" (2005), 소명출판
  15. 한길사 편집실, "가자 고전의 숲으로" (2008), 한길사
  16. 愛默, "錢鍾書傳稿" (1992), 百花文藝出版社
  17. 陳子謙, "錢學論" (1992), 四川文藝出版社
  18. 黄修己, "中國新文學史編纂史" (2007), 北京大學出版社
  19. 木山英雄, "文學復古與文學革命——木山英雄中國現代文學思想論集" (2004), 北京大學出版社
  20. 孙郁, "鲁迅與周作人" (2013), 现代出版社
  21. 孫郁, "回望周作人: 硏究述評" (2004), 河南大學出版社
  22. 陶明志, "周作人論" (1934), 北新書局
  23. 徐从辉, "周作人研究资料 (上)" (2014), 天津人民出版社
  24. 徐从辉, "周作人研究资料 (下)" (2014), 天津人民出版社
  25. 楊周翰, "中國比較文學年鉴 (1986)" (1987), 北京大學出版社
  26. 止庵, "周作人傳" (2009), 山東畫報出版社
  27. 宗廷虎, "钱钟书修辞学思想演绎" (2006), 山东文艺出版社
  28. 김미정, "周作人의 전통문학관: ‘載道'와 '言志'의 문학관을 중심으로", 중국문학, 22 (1994)
  29. 한지연, "錢鍾書의 비평적 글쓰기와 『管錐編』 연구를 위한 小考", 중국현대문학, (67), pp.33~74 (2013), 한국중국현대문학학회
  30. 한지연, "통섭의 시학 - 錢鍾書 『詩可以怨』의 비교문학적 접근", 한중언어문화연구, (42), pp.475~500 (2016), 한국중국언어문화연구회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)