본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고려 최씨집권기의 輔政과 정치운영

Bojeong(輔政) and Political Operation in Choi Families’ Regime (1196-1258)

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

After Choi Chung-heon took power in 1196, he strengthened his political power promising that he would overcome the social crisis and defend the dynasty. He and his successors had been in power for more than 60 years since then. What is the reason why they had been able to maintain absolute power so long while the monarchy and the bureaucracy have been maintained? It is generally assumed that they held the strong private power base, but that is not enough explanation. Also, the research perspective that the military regime abused political power is not enough to reveal the historical character of politics at the period. It is necessary to examine the ideological and institutional grounds that officials condoned and justified the political forms of the Choi families’ regime. First, this study, in order to review the grounds that justifies the political forms, pays attention to the Bojeong(輔政) already performed and discussed in the politics of the first half of the 12th century. Second, it examines the political characteristics that emerged in the process of operating the power by using the Munkaek(門客, private retainers) and the private soldiers(私兵) while maintaining the public bureaucracy. Third, it examines the political characters of the benevolent presents and the banquets that Choi Chung-heon and his successors held frequently in such political form. They expected the effect of securing support base and strengthening their position through such political activities.

Abstract

After Choi Chung-heon took power in 1196, he strengthened his political power promising that he would overcome the social crisis and defend the dynasty. He and his successors had been in power for more than 60 years since then. What is the reason why they had been able to maintain absolute power so long while the monarchy and the bureaucracy have been maintained? It is generally assumed that they held the strong private power base, but that is not enough explanation. Also, the research perspective that the military regime abused political power is not enough to reveal the historical character of politics at the period. It is necessary to examine the ideological and institutional grounds that officials condoned and justified the political forms of the Choi families’ regime. First, this study, in order to review the grounds that justifies the political forms, pays attention to the Bojeong(輔政) already performed and discussed in the politics of the first half of the 12th century. Second, it examines the political characteristics that emerged in the process of operating the power by using the Munkaek(門客, private retainers) and the private soldiers(私兵) while maintaining the public bureaucracy. Third, it examines the political characters of the benevolent presents and the banquets that Choi Chung-heon and his successors held frequently in such political form. They expected the effect of securing support base and strengthening their position through such political activities.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 채웅석, "고려사회의 변화와 고려중기론", 역사와 현실, 32, pp.149~152 (1999)
  2. 오영선, "최씨집권기 정권의 기반과 정치운영", 역사와 현실, 17, pp.56~60 (1995)
  3. "고려사절요", ~
  4. "고려사", ~
  5. 채웅석, "고려중기 외척의 위상과 정치적 역할", 한국중세사연구, (38), pp.335~372 (2014), 한국중세사학회
  6. 金龍善, "高麗墓誌銘集成"
  7. 김용선, "이규보 연보" (2013), 일조각
  8. "漢書 권68, 霍光", ~
  9. "三峰集 권13, 朝鮮經國典 治典摠序", ~
  10. 박재우, "고려 최씨정권의 권력행사와 왕권의 위상", 한국중세사연구, (46), pp.137~185 (2016), 한국중세사학회
  11. 金翰奎, "漢代 및 魏晉南北朝時代의 輔政", 歷史學報, 137 (1993)
  12. 金翰奎, "漢代 및 魏晉南北朝時代의 輔政體制", 東洋史學硏究, 44 (1993)
  13. "益齋亂藁 권9上", ~
  14. 채웅석, "명종대 권력구조와 정치운영", 역사와 현실, 17 (1995)
  15. 김인호, "무인집권기 문신관료의 정치이념과 정책: 명종 18년 조서(詔書)와 봉사(封事) 10조의 검토를 중심으로", 역사와 현실, 17 (1995)
  16. "補閑集 권中, 侍中上柱國崔公功名富貴之極", ~
  17. "東國李相國全集", ~
  18. "尙書 周書 武成", ~
  19. "論語 衛靈公", ~
  20. 장동익, "13世紀前半 崔氏政權期의 宰相", 역사교육논집, (51), pp.319~358 (2013), 역사교육학회
  21. 박재우, "고려 최씨정권의 政房 운영과 성격", 한국중세사연구, (40), pp.247~298 (2014), 한국중세사학회
  22. 민병하, "한국사 7" (1973), 국사편찬위원회
  23. 金潤坤, "高麗 武臣政權時代의 敎定都監", 영남대 문리대학보, 11 (1978)
  24. 曺圭泰, "高麗武人政權硏究" (1995), 서강대학교 출판부
  25. 이정신, "고려 무신정권기의 敎定都監", 東西文化硏究, 6 (1995)
  26. 서각수, "고려 무인정권기 교정도감에 대한 고찰", 典農史論, 7 (2001)
  27. 박재우, "고려 무신정권기 敎定都監에 대한 새로운 해석", 韓國史學報, (60), pp.169~208 (2015), 고려사학회
  28. 盧明鎬, "李載龒博士還曆紀念韓國史學論叢", pp.205~214 (1991)
  29. 柳浩錫, "武人執權期 科擧制의 運營과 薦擧制", 全北史學, 14, pp.32~37 (1991)
  30. 채웅석, "이태진교수정년기념논총 1: 사회적 네트워크와 공간" (2009), 태학사
  31. 채웅석, "고려 중·후기 무뢰와 호협의 행태와 성격", 역사와 현실, 8 (1992)
  32. "櫟翁稗說 前集1, 吏部掌銓注", ~
  33. 柳昌圭, "崔氏武人政權下의 都房의 설치와 그 向方", 東亞硏究, 6, pp.391~ (1985)
  34. 尹龍爀, "崔氏武人政權의 對蒙抗戰姿勢", 史叢, 21·22, pp.304~308 (1977)
  35. 朴龍雲, "高麗時代 臺諫制度 硏究", pp.188~193 (1981), 一志社
  36. "태종실록 권17", ~
  37. 이정신, "고려 무신집권기의 국왕, 희종 연구", 韓國人物史硏究, 2, pp.201~ (2004)
  38. 申虎澈, "林衍·林衍政權 硏究", pp.64~68 (1997), 충북대학교 출판부
  39. 金翰奎, "高麗崔氏政權의 晋陽府", 東亞硏究, 17, pp.168~170 (1989)
  40. 김당택, "한국사 18", pp.90~91 (1993), 국사편찬위원회
  41. 노명호, "韓國古代中世古文書硏究 (上)" (2000)
  42. 김신해, "고려 예종대 ‘恩賜’ 정책의 유형과 정치적 성격", 韓國史學報, (58), pp.65~124 (2015), 고려사학회
  43. "止浦先生文集 권3, 上座主金相國謝傳衣鉢啓", ~
  44. 김아네스, "고려 최우 집정기의 史官", 韓國史學史學報, (28), pp.37~70 (2013), 한국사학사학회
  45. "東國李相國集", ~
  46. 김인호, "고려 관인사회의 잔치와 축제", 동방학지, (129), pp.97~137 (2005), 국학연구원
  47. 한정수, "고려시대 국왕 잔치의 양상과 그 성격", 역사교육, (118), pp.51~85 (2011), 역사교육연구회
  48. 정은정, "원간섭기 開京의 賜宴 변화와 그 무대", 역사와경계, (89), pp.1~39 (2013), 부산경남사학회
  49. "東國李相國後集 권8", ~
  50. "東文選 권64, 淸讌閣記", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)