고려 穆宗12년의 정변과 康兆의 역할
Kang Jo’s Role in “Kang Jo’s Takeover” in the Twelfth Year of Mokjong’s Reign
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to reinterpret the characteristics of “Kang Jo’s Takeover” by critically analyzing the records in Goryeosa about the overthrow in the twelfth year of King Mokjong’s reign. Before the overthrow, Kang Jo, who was the Jungchusa and the Subukmyun-Dosungumsa, had the substantive power to influence King Hyunjong’s accession to the throne. Therefore, this study will deepen understanding about the political history in the reign of King Mokjong and King Hyunjong and also the military force during the early days of the Goryeo dynasty. To explore these issues, this paper examines the consistency problem in the records about the overthrow. As a result, this paper raises a question about the existence of the rebellion of Kim Chiyang and the main agent of King Hyunjong’s takeover—whether the main agent of the takeover was Kang Jo. King Hyunjong and his allies plotted the overthrow in the course of his accession and reign. On the other hand, Kang Jo was only in command of the military as the Jungchusa and the Subukmyun-Dosungumsa. In view of these circumstances, “Kang Jo’s Takeover” should be reexamined as King Hyunjong and his allies, not Kang Jo, took charge of the takeover. That is, the overthrow of King Mokjong was “the coup” led by King Hyunjong and his allies. During this period, the authority of Jungchuwon over military command was shown in the later establishment of Jungchuwon and Jungbang, as well as the power relationship during Kim Hoon and Choi Jill’s rebellion. Thus, the agent and the characteristics of “Kang Jo’s Takeover” should be reinterpreted.
Abstract
This paper aims to reinterpret the characteristics of “Kang Jo’s Takeover” by critically analyzing the records in Goryeosa about the overthrow in the twelfth year of King Mokjong’s reign. Before the overthrow, Kang Jo, who was the Jungchusa and the Subukmyun-Dosungumsa, had the substantive power to influence King Hyunjong’s accession to the throne. Therefore, this study will deepen understanding about the political history in the reign of King Mokjong and King Hyunjong and also the military force during the early days of the Goryeo dynasty. To explore these issues, this paper examines the consistency problem in the records about the overthrow. As a result, this paper raises a question about the existence of the rebellion of Kim Chiyang and the main agent of King Hyunjong’s takeover—whether the main agent of the takeover was Kang Jo. King Hyunjong and his allies plotted the overthrow in the course of his accession and reign. On the other hand, Kang Jo was only in command of the military as the Jungchusa and the Subukmyun-Dosungumsa. In view of these circumstances, “Kang Jo’s Takeover” should be reexamined as King Hyunjong and his allies, not Kang Jo, took charge of the takeover. That is, the overthrow of King Mokjong was “the coup” led by King Hyunjong and his allies. During this period, the authority of Jungchuwon over military command was shown in the later establishment of Jungchuwon and Jungbang, as well as the power relationship during Kim Hoon and Choi Jill’s rebellion. Thus, the agent and the characteristics of “Kang Jo’s Takeover” should be reinterpreted.
참고문헌 (50)
- "高麗史", ~
- "高麗史節要", ~
- "宋史", ~
- "遼史", ~
- 李基白, "高麗兵制史硏究" (1968), 一潮閣
- 李樹健, "韓國中世社會史硏究" (1984), 一潮閣
- 河炫綱, "韓國中世史硏究" (1988), 一潮閣
- 정용숙, "高麗王室族內婚硏究" (1988), 새문社
- 국사편찬위원회, "中國正史朝鮮傳譯註三" (2004), 신서원
- 정용숙, "고려시대의 后妃" (1992), 民音社
- 李基白, "崔承老上書文硏究" (1992), 一潮閣
- 洪元基, "高麗前期軍制硏究" (2001), 혜안
- 송인주, "고려시대 친위군 연구" (2007), 일조각
- 朴龍雲, "『高麗史』 百官志譯註" (2009), 신서원
- 채웅석, "『고려사』형법지 역주" (2009), 신서원
- 高麗時代中樞院硏究, "朴龍雲", 高麗大學校民族文化硏究院, ~ (2001)
- 李泰鎭, "金致陽亂의 性格-高麗初西京勢力의 政治的推移와 관련하여-", 한국사연구, 17 (1977)
- 金塘澤, "高麗穆宗12年의 政變에 대한 一考-穆宗代의 寫經跋文과 관련하여-", 韓國學報, 18 (1980)
- 趙仁成, "高麗兩界州鎭의 防守軍과 州鎭軍, 高麗光宗硏究" (1981), 一潮閣
- 洪承基, "高麗初期中央軍의 조직과 역할-京軍의 성격-, In 高麗政治史硏究" (2001), 一潮閣
- 鄭景鉉, "高麗前期의 保勝軍과 精勇軍", 韓國史硏究, 81 (1993)
- 洪承基, "高麗初期京軍의 二元的構成論에 대하여, In 高麗政治史硏究" (2001), 一潮閣
- 金大中, "高麗前期重房體制의 成立, In 韓國軍事史論文選集 2" (1998)
- 곽승훈, "고려 전기 一切如來心秘密全身舍利寶篋印陀羅尼經의 간행, In 新羅古文獻硏究" (2006)
- 姜玉葉, "高麗 前期 西京勢力의 硏究", 박사, 사학, pp.1998
- 金塘澤, "徐熙와 成宗代정치적 지배세력 , 徐熙와 高麗의 高句麗繼承意識" (1999), 학연문화사
- 權寧國, "고려 전기 軍役制의 성격과 운영", 國史館論叢, 87 (1999)
- 김난옥, "高麗前期의 流配刑", 韓國史硏究, 121 (2003)
- 강은경, "《高麗史》刑法志 公牒相通式에 나타난 지방통치구조", 동방학지, (123), pp.1~39 (2004), 국학연구원
- 권영국, "고려전기의 戶部와 三司 - 당·송제도와의 비교 -", 역사학보, 188(188), pp.59~102 (2005), 역사학회
- 김두향, "고려 현종대 정치와 이계(吏系) 관료", 역사와 현실, 55(55), pp.211~235 (2005), 한국역사연구회
- 김창현, "고려초기 정국과 서경", 사학연구, (80) (2005), 한국사학회
- 김갑동, "고려 현종과 사천지역", 한국중세사연구, (20), pp.197~230 (2006), 한국중세사학회
- 權寧國, "고려 초 徇軍部의 설치와 기능의 변화", 韓國史硏究, 135 (2006)
- 김창현, "고려시대 천추태후와 인예태후의 생애와 신앙", 韓國人物史硏究, 5 (2006)
- 이정훈, "고려전기 중추원의 설치와 職掌의 변화", 동방학지, 134(134), pp.37~78 (2006), 국학연구원
- 윤경진, "高麗史 刑法志 公牒相通式 外官條의 분석", 역사문화연구, (27), pp.34~88 (2007), 역사문화연구소
- 金大淵, "高麗 顯宗의 卽位와 契丹의 侵略原因", 한국중세사연구, 22(22), pp.109~145 (2007), 한국중세사학회
- 전경숙, "고려전기 군사기구 연구", 박사, 한국사, pp.2007
- 김당택, "고려 顯宗代 과거 출신 관리의 정치적 주도권 장악", 역사학보, 200(200), pp.231~248 (2008), 역사학회
- 김창겸, "고려 顯宗代 東宮官 설치", 韓國史學報, (33), pp.131~167 (2008), 고려사학회
- 김아네스, "고려시대 천추태후의 정치적 활동", 한국인물사연구, (10), pp.105~136 (2008), (사)한국인물사연구회
- 권순형, "고려 목종대 헌애왕태후의 섭정에 대한 고찰", 사학연구, (89), pp.49~86 (2008), 한국사학회
- 류주희, "고려전기 중추원의 설치와 그 성격", 역사와 현실, (73), pp.97~125 (2009), 한국역사연구회
- 김갑동, "千秋太后의 실체와 西京 勢力", 역사학연구, (38), pp.67~96 (2010), 호남사학회
- 권영국, "고려전기 군정 ․ 군령기구의 정비", 역사와 현실, (73), pp.127~157 (2009), 한국역사연구회
- 구산우, "고려 현종대의 대거란전쟁과 그 정치 · 외교적 성격", 역사와경계, (74), pp.85~127 (2010), 부산경남사학회
- 이병희, "고려 현종대 사상과 문화정책", 한국중세사연구, (29), pp.213~263 (2010), 한국중세사학회
- 이정훈, "고려 현종대 거란과의 전쟁과 지배체제 개편", 한국중세사연구, (29), pp.177~212 (2010), 한국중세사학회
- 최종석, "高麗前期 保勝·精勇軍의 性格과 地方軍 構成에 대한 再檢討", 역사와 담론, (58), pp.33~71 (2011), 호서사학회