본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고려 명종의 측근 세력의 동향

A Study on the Royal Operation of Political Powers in the Era of King Myeongjong in Goryeo

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

As above, king Myeongjong’s political powers and their operation has been reviewed. Following is the summary of the research. First of all, it is duty of Daegan as Jikgan to assist the king. The era of king Myeongjong was actually the period of paralyzed function of Daegan, and the close aides of Myeongjong were appointed as Daegan, rather than Jikgan, helping Myeongjong politically. In terms of rank, military subjects were former soldiers who returned home from units, while civil subjects followed the tradition of early Goryeo period and were filled with high birth nobles thought not great nobles. It is undoubted for their sons to cooperate with Myeongjong’s political operation. Seungseon was a Huseol(a subject in charge of media) of the king who assisted king in proximity and was assigned with close aides. Except for Munjangpil, one of close aides of Myeongjong, most civil subjects coming from high birth nobles were appointed to the office. Investigation showed that those who had conducted the office of Seungseon came mostly to the rank of Jaesin. On the other hand, some others conducted the office of Seungseon holding the office of Jaseon. As for the operation of Byeongbusa, the restraint and balance, Myeongjong’ unique way of political operation, is seen. That appeared frequently at the period under the reign of Euimin Lee and that was necessary for the sake of balance with the close aides. It is notable that the close military subjects like Yeongmo Min, Munjun Han and Geukgyeom Mun were appointed Panbyeongbusa at the time of no military subject leadership after the death of Gyeongdaeseung or at the time a political fluctuation like the revolt of Wonjeong Jo. Panbyeongbusa is a very important position concerning the direction of military power, and the appointment of a civil subject of Myeongjong’s close aides to the office suggests that the royal power of king myeongjong was never frail and he initiated the whole sovereignty instead. As for the appointment of Jaechu, lots of civil(not military) subjects of Myeongjong’s close aides together with civil subjects of Igyangbu like Yeohae Choi, Gonggwon Yu, Ucheong Choi, Munjeo Lee and Minbi Im were appointed to the Chusin office in Chumilwon that is related to military discipline affairs. In other words, not military but civil subjects together with civil subjects of Igyangbu like Ucheong Choi, Munjeo Lee and Minbi Im were appointed in large numbers. It seems Myeongjong’s intention, concerning military power, to provide against a political revolution and restrain the military subjects’ power by entrusting the civil subjects of his close aides with the military discipline affairs. Lastly, concerning civil service examination, Jigonggeo and Dongjigonggeo, the office of examination manager, were also dominated by civil subjects of Myeongjong’s close aides including Yeongmo Min, Munjun Han, Geukgyeom Mun, Sinyak Yeom, Minbi Im and Gonggwon Yu. However it is remarkable that Jigonggeo and Dongjigonggeo, the office of examination manager, unlike Panbyeongbusa and Ibyeongbusa, were all appointed with civil subjects. The examination managers promoted their political relations by making the student-teacher relationships with Jwaju centering around the first-ranks. Considering however those examination managers were composed of civil subjects of Myeongjong’s close aides, it is understood that the rising powers of civil subjects would have helped to strengthen the royal power of king Myeongjong and to stabilize the foundation of power.

Abstract

As above, king Myeongjong’s political powers and their operation has been reviewed. Following is the summary of the research. First of all, it is duty of Daegan as Jikgan to assist the king. The era of king Myeongjong was actually the period of paralyzed function of Daegan, and the close aides of Myeongjong were appointed as Daegan, rather than Jikgan, helping Myeongjong politically. In terms of rank, military subjects were former soldiers who returned home from units, while civil subjects followed the tradition of early Goryeo period and were filled with high birth nobles thought not great nobles. It is undoubted for their sons to cooperate with Myeongjong’s political operation. Seungseon was a Huseol(a subject in charge of media) of the king who assisted king in proximity and was assigned with close aides. Except for Munjangpil, one of close aides of Myeongjong, most civil subjects coming from high birth nobles were appointed to the office. Investigation showed that those who had conducted the office of Seungseon came mostly to the rank of Jaesin. On the other hand, some others conducted the office of Seungseon holding the office of Jaseon. As for the operation of Byeongbusa, the restraint and balance, Myeongjong’ unique way of political operation, is seen. That appeared frequently at the period under the reign of Euimin Lee and that was necessary for the sake of balance with the close aides. It is notable that the close military subjects like Yeongmo Min, Munjun Han and Geukgyeom Mun were appointed Panbyeongbusa at the time of no military subject leadership after the death of Gyeongdaeseung or at the time a political fluctuation like the revolt of Wonjeong Jo. Panbyeongbusa is a very important position concerning the direction of military power, and the appointment of a civil subject of Myeongjong’s close aides to the office suggests that the royal power of king myeongjong was never frail and he initiated the whole sovereignty instead. As for the appointment of Jaechu, lots of civil(not military) subjects of Myeongjong’s close aides together with civil subjects of Igyangbu like Yeohae Choi, Gonggwon Yu, Ucheong Choi, Munjeo Lee and Minbi Im were appointed to the Chusin office in Chumilwon that is related to military discipline affairs. In other words, not military but civil subjects together with civil subjects of Igyangbu like Ucheong Choi, Munjeo Lee and Minbi Im were appointed in large numbers. It seems Myeongjong’s intention, concerning military power, to provide against a political revolution and restrain the military subjects’ power by entrusting the civil subjects of his close aides with the military discipline affairs. Lastly, concerning civil service examination, Jigonggeo and Dongjigonggeo, the office of examination manager, were also dominated by civil subjects of Myeongjong’s close aides including Yeongmo Min, Munjun Han, Geukgyeom Mun, Sinyak Yeom, Minbi Im and Gonggwon Yu. However it is remarkable that Jigonggeo and Dongjigonggeo, the office of examination manager, unlike Panbyeongbusa and Ibyeongbusa, were all appointed with civil subjects. The examination managers promoted their political relations by making the student-teacher relationships with Jwaju centering around the first-ranks. Considering however those examination managers were composed of civil subjects of Myeongjong’s close aides, it is understood that the rising powers of civil subjects would have helped to strengthen the royal power of king Myeongjong and to stabilize the foundation of power.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 변태섭, "高麗後期의 무반에 대하여", 서울대논문집, 12, pp.172~184 (1966)
  2. 채웅석, "명종대 權力構造와 정치운영", 역사와 현실, 17, pp.27~36 (1995)
  3. 나만수, "고려 명종대 重房政治와 국왕", 국사관논총, 31, pp.140~152 (1992)
  4. 김당택, "慶大升執權을 통해 본 무신란, In 한국사 전환기의 문제들" (1993), 지식산업사
  5. "李義旼政權의 성격, In 고려무인정권연구", pp.37~44 (1987), 새문사
  6. "高麗史節要", ~
  7. 김호동, "이의민정권의 재조명", 경대사론, 7, pp.39~ (1994)
  8. 남인국, "무신집권기 文臣中心 정치세력의 지위회복과정, In 高麗中期 정치세력연구" (1999), 신서원
  9. 이정신, "고려 무신정권기 雲門〮ㆍ草田민의 봉기", 사총, 37(38), pp.26~ (1990)
  10. 허흥식, "고려시대 소군의 신분상 특성, In 택와허선도선생 정년기념 한국사학논총" (1992), 일조각
  11. 김인호, "무인집권기 문신관료의 정치이념과 정책-명종 18년 詔書와 封事 10조의 검토를 중심으로", 역사와, 17 (1995)
  12. 변태섭, "高麗朝의 문반과 무반", 사학연구, 11 (1961)
  13. 노명호, "李資謙일파와 韓安仁일파의 족당세력-고려중기 親屬들의 정치세력화 樣態", 한국사론, 17, pp.199~202 (1987)
  14. 김용선, "고려무인정권시대, In 『역주 고려묘지명집성』上" (2006), 한림대학교 출판부
  15. 김용선, "장충의묘지명", 364~
  16. "高麗史", ~
  17. 박용운, "高麗時代의 정안임씨, 철원최씨, 공암허씨 가문 분석", 한국사논총, 3, pp.36~41 (1978)
  18. E. J Shultz, "韓安仁 일파의 등장과 그 역할", 역사학보, 99(100), pp.163~180 (1983)
  19. 민현구, "「월남사지, 진각국사비의 음기에 대한 一考察」; 「고려무신정권과 曹溪宗」", 진단학보, 36, pp.32~ (1973), 진단학회
  20. 황병성, "고려 무인정권기 寺院勢力의 동향", 한국사상사학, 4(5) (1993)
  21. 정진우, "고려무신정권과 僧徒와의 대립", 청대사림, 4(5) (1985)
  22. 한기문, "高麗 中期 흥황사의 창건과 화엄종단", 향도문화, 5 (1990)
  23. 이수건, "高麗後期 지배세력과 토성, In 한국중세사회사연구", pp.185~297 (1984), 일조각
  24. 장상주, "高麗 明宗 擁立의 政治勢力에 대한 諸問題", 대구사학, 103, pp.31~64 (2011), 대구사학회
  25. 김용선, "文章弼墓誌銘", pp.416~418
  26. 김용선, "김순묘지명", 493~
  27. 김용선, "윤종창묘지명", 413~
  28. 허흥식, "고려 科擧制度 성립과 발전, In 고려 과거제도사 연구", pp.38~43, 일조각
  29. 박용운, "무신란 이후 대간의 신분, In 고려시대 臺諫制度 연구", pp.162~ (1981), 일지사
  30. 민병하, "무신정권의 지배기구, In 高麗武臣정권연구", pp.100~101 (1990), 성균관대학교 출판부
  31. 신수정, "고려 明宗대의 문신 재상에 관한 一考察", 한성사학, 17, pp.69~ (2003)
  32. 변태섭, "고려의 중추원", 진단학보, 41, pp.64~65 (1976)
  33. 허흥식, "고려 과거제도 성립과 발전, In 고려 과거제도사 연구", pp.40~60 (1985), 일조각
  34. 박용운, "高麗시대의 정안임씨, 철원최씨, 공암 허씨 家門 分析", 한국사논총, 3, pp.55~ (1978)
  35. 韓永愚, "조선 전기사학의 연구", 박사, pp.1981
  36. 김용선, "이문탁묘지명", 372~375

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)