高麗 明宗 擁立의 政治勢力에 대한 諸問題
Problems around the Political Powers Who Enthroned King Myeongjong in Goryeo Dynasty
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As above, investigated was the political powers of and the possibility of coup by Myeongjong in the coup in the year Gyeongin. First of all, the political power of Wangje in the first half of the 12th century was attended that came up after the coup in Sukjong’s era. This led to the treason of Seungtongjeong in Yejong’s era and Daebanggong Bo in Injong’s era, preparing a momentum to form the political power of Wangje in Euijong’s era. As a result, Euijong, from the beginning of his enthronement, attacked Daeryeonghu Gyeong, his competitor to the royal authority, and his clan power Jeong Seo and Kim Ih-Yeong. This tendency also appears in case of uterine brother Igyanghu and Pyeongryanghu. It shows that the political tendency of kingship in the first half of the 12th century is extended to Euijong’s era. Then it was found out that Myeongjong formed his political power with those civil and military officials who had the same political interest as his centering around the civil officials of Igyangbu. With these on the center, Myeongjong was enthroned in the coup in the year Gyeongin, being connected with such military officials as Jeong Jung-Bu and Lee Eui-Bang. In other words, the coup was developed into two different aspects. This tells that the coup in the year Gyeongin worked as an important variable to the confrontation between the king and those civil and military officials, and the Wangje’s political power, to the specific political situation in Euiojong’s era. It was found out in the process of Daeryeonghu’s clan power shifting into Myeongjong’s political power as Daeryeonghu was removed in Yusieuibyeon(Coup of Flowing Arrow). In conclusion, the coup in the year Gyeongin is understood to be done as Myeongjong connected his own political power with military officials, contrary to the existing accepted idea. (Kyungpook National University/jangs2007@naver.com)
Abstract
As above, investigated was the political powers of and the possibility of coup by Myeongjong in the coup in the year Gyeongin. First of all, the political power of Wangje in the first half of the 12th century was attended that came up after the coup in Sukjong’s era. This led to the treason of Seungtongjeong in Yejong’s era and Daebanggong Bo in Injong’s era, preparing a momentum to form the political power of Wangje in Euijong’s era. As a result, Euijong, from the beginning of his enthronement, attacked Daeryeonghu Gyeong, his competitor to the royal authority, and his clan power Jeong Seo and Kim Ih-Yeong. This tendency also appears in case of uterine brother Igyanghu and Pyeongryanghu. It shows that the political tendency of kingship in the first half of the 12th century is extended to Euijong’s era. Then it was found out that Myeongjong formed his political power with those civil and military officials who had the same political interest as his centering around the civil officials of Igyangbu. With these on the center, Myeongjong was enthroned in the coup in the year Gyeongin, being connected with such military officials as Jeong Jung-Bu and Lee Eui-Bang. In other words, the coup was developed into two different aspects. This tells that the coup in the year Gyeongin worked as an important variable to the confrontation between the king and those civil and military officials, and the Wangje’s political power, to the specific political situation in Euiojong’s era. It was found out in the process of Daeryeonghu’s clan power shifting into Myeongjong’s political power as Daeryeonghu was removed in Yusieuibyeon(Coup of Flowing Arrow). In conclusion, the coup in the year Gyeongin is understood to be done as Myeongjong connected his own political power with military officials, contrary to the existing accepted idea. (Kyungpook National University/jangs2007@naver.com)
참고문헌 (46)
- "高麗史", ~
- "高麗史節要", ~
- 金洛珍, "牽龍軍과 武臣亂, In 高麗武人政權硏究", pp.11~44 (1995), 西江大學校 出版部
- 金塘澤, "高麗 毅宗代의 정치적 상황과 武臣亂", 震檀學報, (75), pp.41~180 (1993)
- 金塘澤, "무신정권시대의 군제", pp.22~227 (1983), 고려군제사
- 金塘澤, "이의민 정권의 성격, In 高麗 武人政權 硏究", pp.24~43 (1987), 새문사
- 金秉仁, "睿宗의 즉위와 側近세력의 형성, In 高麗 睿宗代 政治勢力 硏究", pp.23~24 (2003), 景仁文化社
- 김상기, "新編 高麗時代史" (1985), 서울대학교 출판부
- 김용선, "金純墓誌銘", 440~441
- 김용선, "金元義墓誌銘", 493~494
- 김용선, "盧卓儒墓誌銘", 420~
- 김용선, "文章弼墓誌銘", 416~
- 김용선, "白任至墓誌銘", pp.418~
- 김용선, "柳公權墓誌銘", 435~
- 김용선, "庾應圭墓誌銘", 356~
- 김용선, "尹宗諹墓誌銘", 413~
- 김용선, "李文著墓誌銘", 366~
- 김용선, "張忠義墓誌銘", 364~
- 김용선, "晉光仁墓誌銘", 398~
- 김용선, "高麗武人政權時代, In 譯註 高麗墓誌銘集成 上" (2006), 한림대학교 출판부
- 김윤곤, "高麗귀족사회의 제모순", 韓國史, (7), pp.45~ (1977)
- 羅滿洙, "高麗 明宗代 重房政治와 國王", 국사관논총, (31) (1992)
- 남인국, "새로운 政治勢力의 등장과 신통치질서의 확립, In 高麗중기 정치세력 硏究", pp.25~162 (1999), 신서원
- 남인국, "의종대 정권과 정치세력의 對立, In 고려중기 정치세력 연구" (1999), 신서원
- 노명호, "李資謙 일파와 한안인일파의 족당세력", 한국사론, (17), pp.204~ (1987)
- 朴龍雲, "高麗時代의 定安任氏ㆍ鐵原崔氏ㆍ孔巖許氏 家門 分析", 韓國史論叢, (3), pp.55~ (1978)
- 朴龍雲, "대간의 정치적 기능과 그 변천, In 고려시대 대간제도 연구", pp.188~189 (1980), 일지사
- 박종기, "예종대 정치개혁과 정치세력의 變動", 역사와 현실, (9) (1993)
- 朴漢男, "최유청의 生涯와 詩文分析", 國史館論叢, (24), pp.139~ (1991)
- 邊太燮, "고려무반연구, In 高麗政治制度史 硏究", pp.349~358 (1997), 一潮閣
- 서성호, "肅宗대 정치의 추이와 정치세력", 歷史와 現實, (9) (1993)
- 오영선, "인종대 정치세력의 변동과 政策의 성격", 역사와 현실, (9) (1993)
- 이기백, "高麗兵制史硏究" (1968), 일조각
- 이병도, "高麗時代의 硏究" (1980), 아세아문화사
- 李樹健, "고려전기 支配세력과 토성, In 한국중세社會史硏究", pp.154~292 (1984), 一潮閣
- 정용숙, "고려시대의 后妃", pp.194~195 (1992), 民音社
- 채웅석, "12세기 전반기 정치사의 새로운 理解", 역사와 현실, (9), pp.10~13 (1993)
- 채웅석, "고려 중후기 무뢰와 호협의 형태와 그 성격", 역사와 현실, (3), pp.245~264 (1990)
- 채웅석, "명종대 권력구조와 정치운영", 역사와 현실, (17) (1995)
- 채웅석, "毅宗代 정국의 추이와 정치운영", 역사와 현실, (9) (1993)
- 채웅석, "의종대 정국의 추이와 정치운영", 역사와 현실, (9), pp.13~119 (1993)
- 하현강, "고려시대의 서경, In 韓國中世史硏究", pp.343~ (1988), 일조각
- 한기문, "高麗 中期 興王寺의 創建과 華嚴宗團", 향토문화, (5), pp.23~25 (1993)
- 허홍식, "고려 科擧制度 성립과 발전, In 고려 과거제도사 연구", pp.43~ (1985), 일조각
- 황병성, "김보당 난의 일성격, In 한국사연구", pp.40~42 (1985), 한국사연구회
- E. J. Shultz, "韓安仁派의 登場과 그 役割", 歷史學報, (99ㆍ100), pp.150~182 (1983)