숙종~영조시기 三南 등의 방어 체제 정비와 변화: 교통로에 위치한 요충지 방어의 확장을 중심으로
The maintenance and change of the defense system of Sukjong-Youngjo period, especially Samnam(三南) and other province: Focusing on the expansion of the defense in strategic traffic point
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Dynasties of the Korean peninsula traditionally focused on mountain fortress(山城). However, the lesson of war between Qing dynasty(丙子胡亂) showed that the mountain fortress could not block the enemy’s direct course to major city. In response, the Chosun regime strengthened defense of strategic traffic point as well as the construction of mountain fortress after the war. During the Sukjong(肅宗) period, the defense of strategic traffic point centered on the mountain path(northern province : 平安道, 黃海道, 咸境道), port, river mouth, island(southern province : 慶尙道, 全羅道, 忠淸道). And it's major units were border military commanders(邊將) & military outposts(鎭堡). Changes in the political-financial situation of the Youngjo(英祖) period made it difficult to maintain a defense system centered on coastal point in southern province. As an alternative to this, Chosun regime focused land-based defence system just like northern area. Therefore, land defence system centered on mountain path extended to the southern provice and eastern province(江原道). Meanwhile, the military command near the traffic point was unified from the border military commander to local governor(守令). Due to the inconvenience of mountain residents and the labor of manpower, the defense system was limited. So the city wall of town(邑城), the administrative center of the people's inhabitants, became the center of defense. However, there is a historical significance in that this process not only shows the Chosun’s response to the invasion but also shows the transition from mountain fortress to city wall defense.
Abstract
Dynasties of the Korean peninsula traditionally focused on mountain fortress(山城). However, the lesson of war between Qing dynasty(丙子胡亂) showed that the mountain fortress could not block the enemy’s direct course to major city. In response, the Chosun regime strengthened defense of strategic traffic point as well as the construction of mountain fortress after the war. During the Sukjong(肅宗) period, the defense of strategic traffic point centered on the mountain path(northern province : 平安道, 黃海道, 咸境道), port, river mouth, island(southern province : 慶尙道, 全羅道, 忠淸道). And it's major units were border military commanders(邊將) & military outposts(鎭堡). Changes in the political-financial situation of the Youngjo(英祖) period made it difficult to maintain a defense system centered on coastal point in southern province. As an alternative to this, Chosun regime focused land-based defence system just like northern area. Therefore, land defence system centered on mountain path extended to the southern provice and eastern province(江原道). Meanwhile, the military command near the traffic point was unified from the border military commander to local governor(守令). Due to the inconvenience of mountain residents and the labor of manpower, the defense system was limited. So the city wall of town(邑城), the administrative center of the people's inhabitants, became the center of defense. However, there is a historical significance in that this process not only shows the Chosun’s response to the invasion but also shows the transition from mountain fortress to city wall defense.
참고문헌 (52)
- 강성문, "조선전기의 관방론 연구", 한국군사학논집, 50 (1996)
- 심정보, "읍성축조에 있어서 ‘築城新圖’의 반포 목적과 고고학적 검토", 문물연구, 22(22), pp.161~188 (2012), 동아시아문물연구소[DOI]
- 유재춘, "조선전기 경상도의 지역거점 산성 연구", 지역과 역사, (26), pp.79~118 (2010), 부경역사연구소
- 차용걸, "조선후기 산성방어체제의 운영", 중원문화재연구, 4 (2008)
- 강석화, "조선후기 평안도지역 압록강변의 방어쳬계", 한국문화, (34), pp.167~199 (2004), 규장각한국학연구원
- 정해은, "숙종 초기 평안도의 변장 증설과 방어 체제의 변화", 사학연구, (120), pp.37~74 (2015), 한국사학회
- 고승희, "조선후기 황해도 內地 방어체계", 한국문화, (38), pp.391~419 (2006), 규장각한국학연구원
- 李恒福, "白沙集 권2"
- 趙慶男, "亂中雜錄", ~
- 鄭慶雲, "孤臺日錄", ~
- 裵龍吉, "琴易堂集 권2"
- 趙翼, "포저집 권25"
- 鄭斗卿, "東溟集 권12"
- 尹善道, "孤山遺稿 권2"
- 金堉, "潛谷遺秙 권4"
- 김창수, "17세기 후반 朝鮮使臣의 공식보고와 정치적 파장", 사학연구, (106), pp.141~173 (2012), 한국사학회[DOI]
- 배우성, "조선후기 천하관과 국토관의 변화", pp.68~69 (1998), 일지사
- 이철성, "17세기 平安道 ？江邊 7邑？의 방어체제", 韓國史學報, (13), pp.11~ (2002), 고려사학회
- 노영구, "조선후기 함경 남도 幹線 방어체계", 한국문화, (36), pp.375~412 (2005), 규장각한국학연구원
- "國朝寶鑑 권43, 肅宗朝 3", ~
- 차문섭, "조선시대군제연구" (1989), 단국대학교 출판부
- 洪汝河, "木齋集 권5"
- "孝宗實錄 권14", ~
- 정응수, "정경(鄭經)의 조선침공설에 관한 고찰", 日本文化學報, (66), pp.339~358 (2015), 한국일본문화학회[DOI]
- 의 필담을 통한 상호 소통, "열상고전연구", 2008, 187~225, pp.열상고전연구회, 10.15859[DOI]
- "宣祖實錄 권66", ~
- "肅宗實錄", ~
- "萬機要覽 軍政 4, 關防", ~
- "備邊司謄錄", ~
- "肅宗實錄補闕正誤 권55", ~
- 이선희, "조선후기 황해도 水營의 운영", 한국문화, (38), pp.421~447 (2006), 규장각한국학연구원
- "承政院日記", ~
- 송기중, "17세기 수군방어체제의 개편", 조선시대사학보, (53), pp.5~44 (2010), 조선시대사학회
- "備邊司謄錄", ~
- 한상권, "18세기 전반 명화적의 활동과 정부의 대응책", 한국문화, 13 (1992)
- 고성훈, "무신란과 모반사건: 영조의 정통성을 묻다", pp.67~ (2013), 한국학중앙연구원 출판부
- 趙顯命, "築城啓秒", ~
- 노영구, "영조대의 한영도성수비 정비", pp.168~ (2013), 한국학중앙연구원 출판부
- 송양섭, "영조의 국가정책과 정치이념", pp.122~ (2012), 한국학중앙연구원출판부
- 송기중, "17~18세기 수군 軍船의 배치 변화와 개선 방안", 동방학지, (169), pp.139~166 (2015), 국학연구원[DOI]
- "承政院日記", ~
- "嶺南邑誌", ~
- "慶尙道聞慶縣鳥嶺山城節目成冊, 而事係軍制, 監營不容擅便", ~
- "鳥嶺山城守城節目, 備邊司謄錄, 使本道兵使, 議於道臣", ~
- "英祖實錄", ~
- 김창수, "19세기 전반 조선 사신의 청 정세인식- 청 황제 평가를 중심으로 -", 사학연구, (126), pp.279~314 (2017), 한국사학회
- 장필기, "영조 대의 무신란" (2014), 한국학중앙연구원출판부
- 권내현, "조선후기 평안도 재정 연구" (2004), 지식산업사
- "輿地圖書", ~
- 조준호, "조선후기의 수도방위체제", pp.146~ (1998), 서울학연구소
- "朝鮮金石總覽 下" (1976), 아세아문화사
- 유재춘, "18세기 全州府城 축성기록 '築城謄錄草' 연구", 사학연구, (81), pp.39~85 (2006), 한국사학회