조선 전기 부경사절에게 발급된 신분증명서와 명 국내 역로 이용 절차
Passports of Tributary Missions in Early Joseon Period and Immigration Procedure of Ming Liaodong Military Office
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper will reconstruct the form and content of the travel documents issued by the Joseon government for its tributary missions to enter into Ming territory. Also, the research will then examine the administrative function of the documents and the immigration procedures of the Ming Liaodong military office, which permitted Joseon missions to use the Ming postal system on their way to Beijing. Previous studies have recognized the Ipchaekbodan(入柵報單), a document included in diplomacy manual Tongmungwanji(通文館志), as a passport that recorded the number of people in every Joseon tributary mission. However, the Ipchaekbodan was not an official document issued by the Joseon king or government, but rather an application paper for entry that the envoys filled out and submitted when entering Qing territory. The passport issued by the Joseon government to its envoys to Ming was a set of Chagwan(差關) and Chabi(差批), which were sealed by the Office of State Councilors. The Chagwan was essentially a duty assignment paper to the envoy, listing the number of people in his mission and requiring the provision of the horses needed. The Chabi was a complementary document to the Chagwan, written to guarantee the procurement of personal horses for the envoys themselves to ride to Beijing. Thus, Chagwan and Chabi were official documents issued by the Joseon government, listing the required provision and horses. It seems that Chagwan had been used as a passport for tributary missions as early as the third year of King Sejong (1421), and was issued whenever an envoy was dispatched to China until the end of the 19th century. Chagwan and Chabi were written according to the format of the Ming official travel documents, which were designed to be used with the Fuyan(符驗), the imperial license for official travelers. Chagwan and Chabi took the form of Ming official travel documents because Joseon inherited the historical experience of the Goryeo dynasty under the Mongol Empire. As a vassal state of the great Mongol Empire, the Goryeo dynasty received Mongolian imperial travel licenses and issued Mongolian travel documents to its envoys to the imperial court. When the Ming dynasty overthrew the Mongols in China proper, Goryeo "returned" the Mongolian travel licenses to the Ming and requested Ming replacements. It is assumed that Goryeo and Joseon altered the form of their travel documents according to Ming style after Goryeo received Ming travel licenses. Chagwan and Chabi were insufficient to guarantee a smooth immigration process for Joseon envoys to Ming. The travel documents issued by the Joseon government and the certification granted by the Ming emperor were complementary. Also, Joseon tributary envoys needed other relevant papers as well. A Joseon tributary mission departed Seoul for Ming with an imperial certificate (Fuyan) from the Ming emperor, an official letter(咨文) from the king of Joseon to the Liaodong military office requesting cooperation in the immigration of the envoys, and a set of Chagwan and Chabi. After joining the security convoy in Uiju, the mission proceeded to the Lianshan Gate(連山關) and submitted the Chagwan and Chabi, and his application paper(報單) which included the number of the mission and the security convoy. When the mission arrived in Liaoyang, they submitted the royal letter to Liaodong military office. Then the office processed the immigration procedures for the tributary mission according to the contents of the Chagwan and Chabi.
Abstract
This paper will reconstruct the form and content of the travel documents issued by the Joseon government for its tributary missions to enter into Ming territory. Also, the research will then examine the administrative function of the documents and the immigration procedures of the Ming Liaodong military office, which permitted Joseon missions to use the Ming postal system on their way to Beijing. Previous studies have recognized the Ipchaekbodan(入柵報單), a document included in diplomacy manual Tongmungwanji(通文館志), as a passport that recorded the number of people in every Joseon tributary mission. However, the Ipchaekbodan was not an official document issued by the Joseon king or government, but rather an application paper for entry that the envoys filled out and submitted when entering Qing territory. The passport issued by the Joseon government to its envoys to Ming was a set of Chagwan(差關) and Chabi(差批), which were sealed by the Office of State Councilors. The Chagwan was essentially a duty assignment paper to the envoy, listing the number of people in his mission and requiring the provision of the horses needed. The Chabi was a complementary document to the Chagwan, written to guarantee the procurement of personal horses for the envoys themselves to ride to Beijing. Thus, Chagwan and Chabi were official documents issued by the Joseon government, listing the required provision and horses. It seems that Chagwan had been used as a passport for tributary missions as early as the third year of King Sejong (1421), and was issued whenever an envoy was dispatched to China until the end of the 19th century. Chagwan and Chabi were written according to the format of the Ming official travel documents, which were designed to be used with the Fuyan(符驗), the imperial license for official travelers. Chagwan and Chabi took the form of Ming official travel documents because Joseon inherited the historical experience of the Goryeo dynasty under the Mongol Empire. As a vassal state of the great Mongol Empire, the Goryeo dynasty received Mongolian imperial travel licenses and issued Mongolian travel documents to its envoys to the imperial court. When the Ming dynasty overthrew the Mongols in China proper, Goryeo "returned" the Mongolian travel licenses to the Ming and requested Ming replacements. It is assumed that Goryeo and Joseon altered the form of their travel documents according to Ming style after Goryeo received Ming travel licenses. Chagwan and Chabi were insufficient to guarantee a smooth immigration process for Joseon envoys to Ming. The travel documents issued by the Joseon government and the certification granted by the Ming emperor were complementary. Also, Joseon tributary envoys needed other relevant papers as well. A Joseon tributary mission departed Seoul for Ming with an imperial certificate (Fuyan) from the Ming emperor, an official letter(咨文) from the king of Joseon to the Liaodong military office requesting cooperation in the immigration of the envoys, and a set of Chagwan and Chabi. After joining the security convoy in Uiju, the mission proceeded to the Lianshan Gate(連山關) and submitted the Chagwan and Chabi, and his application paper(報單) which included the number of the mission and the security convoy. When the mission arrived in Liaoyang, they submitted the royal letter to Liaodong military office. Then the office processed the immigration procedures for the tributary mission according to the contents of the Chagwan and Chabi.
참고문헌 (84)
- 김도형, "한국 근대 旅行券(旅券) 제도의 성립과 추이", 한국근현대사연구, (77), pp.7~55 (2016), 한국근현대사학회
- 김동희, "개항기 집조․빙표제도와 조선인의 해외도항", 동아시아문화연구, (77), pp.81~106 (2019), 동아시아문화연구소[DOI]
- 송진, "고대 동아시아의 使臣 왕래와 符節 - 韓·中 관계를 중심으로 -", 숭실사학, (40), pp.329~359 (2018), 숭실사학회[DOI]
- 岡本眞, "國書がむすぶ外交" (2019), 東京大學出版會
- 橋本雄, "國書がむすぶ外交" (2019), 東京大學出版會
- 中村榮孝, "日鮮關係史の硏究 上" (1970), 吉川弘文館
- 張存武, "淸韓宗藩貿易: 1637~1894", pp.35~ (1985), 中央硏究院近代史硏究所
- 柳承宙, "朝鮮後期 朝·淸 貿易小考", 國史館論叢, 30, pp.221~ (1991)
- 김경록, "朝鮮時代 使行과 使行記錄", 한국문화, (38), pp.193~230 (2006), 규장각한국학연구원
- 정동훈, "明代 前期 外國 使節의 身分證明 方式과 國家間 體系", 명청사연구, (40), pp.1~34 (2013), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 辻大和, "朝鮮の対明朝貢使節が携帯した文書─符験と勘合", 韓国朝鮮文化研究, 16 (2017)
- 구도영, "明代 朝鮮 使行의 身分 證明에 대한 종합 분석 ― 勘合부터 얼굴 認知까지 ―", 명청사연구, (52), pp.37~69 (2019), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 서성호, "덕수1784 “織物馬牌”의 正體와 明 符驗", 東垣學術論文集, 16 (2015)
- 김경록, "明代 驛傳制度와 韓中關係에서 符驗의 意味 ― 홍무연간을 중심으로 ―", 명청사연구, (49), pp.1~42 (2018), 명청사학회[DOI]
- 최종석, "1356(공민왕 5)~1369년(공민왕 18) 고려-몽골(원) 관계의 성격 - ‘원간섭기’와의 연속성을 중심으로 -", 역사교육, (116), pp.233~271 (2010), 역사교육연구회
- 張東翼, "モンゴル帝国期の北東アジア", pp.60~ (2016), 汲古書院
- 丁煥, "檜山集 卷2, 朝天錄", ~
- "通文館志(奎731) 卷2, 事大 上, 文書封進", ~
- 李𡊠, "燕行記事", ~
- 李海應, "薊山紀程 卷5, 附錄, 附 報單(入栅時)", ~
- 임영현, "조선 후기 통신사행 준비 단계 문서를 통해 본 1811년 사행 준비", 한일관계사연구, (72), pp.111~148 (2021), 한일관계사학회[DOI]
- "승정원일기", ~
- "일성록", ~ (1806)
- "同文彙考 補編 卷8, 事大文書式", ~
- "迎接都監都廳儀軌", 臺北 故宮博物院 소장 원본, 東洋文庫 소장 마이크로필름, ~
- "세종실록", ~
- "遼東志 卷4", ~ (1912)
- "중종실록", ~
- "선조실록", ~
- "吏文謄錄", ~
- 崔世珍, "이문 역주 상" (2012), 세창출판사
- 黨寶海, "蒙元驛站交通硏究" (2006), 崑崙出版社
- "성종실록 권157", ~
- "受敎謄錄", 奎12867의1, 11~
- "디지털 장서각"[URL]
- "태종실록", ~
- "고종실록 권31", ~ (1894)
- 趙世延, "經世大典輯校", pp.497~498 (2020), 中華書局
- "經世大典輯校", ~
- "永樂大全 卷15950", ~
- "朴通事諺解(奎貴1810) 上", ~
- 崔世珍, "老朴集覽考" (1966), 進修堂
- 船田善之, "元代の命令文書の開讀使臣について: その人的構成と巡歴ルートを中心に", 東方學, 111, pp.12~13 (2006)
- "朴通事諺解 中", ~
- 이육화, "≪朴通事新註新譯(六)≫", 중국학논총, (41), pp.351~380 (2013), 중국학연구소[DOI]
- 蘇同炳, "明代驛遞制度", pp.351~358 (1969), 中華叢書編審委員會
- 문보미, "조선시대 관문서 關의 기원과 수용-행이체계를 중심으로-", 古文書硏究, 37, pp.35~62 (2010), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
- 魚叔權, "稗官雜記(寒皐觀外史 1책) 卷1", ~
- 李開先, "李中麓閑居集(중국기본고적고)文 卷6", ~
- 李寅榮, "淸芬室書目", pp.346~347 (1968), 寶蓮閣
- "大明會典", ~
- 祁承㸁, "明南京車駕司職掌" (1934), 商務印書館
- "명효종실록 권143", ~
- "명영종실록", ~
- 楊一淸, "關中奏議全集(叢書集成續編 57) 卷3", ~
- 王守仁, "王陽明集 卷30, 續編5", ~
- 구범진, "이문 역주 하", pp.191~ (2012), 세창출판사
- "皇明條法事類纂"[URL]
- 崔溥, "錦南集 卷5, 漂海錄", ~
- 龔用卿, "使朝鮮錄 1책", ~ (1937)
- 정동훈, "고려 사신의 몽골 잠치(站赤) 이용", 사학연구, (134), pp.69~122 (2019), 한국사학회[DOI]
- "고려사", ~
- "고려사절요 권32", ~
- 윤은숙, "고려의 北元칭호 사용과 동아시아 인식 -고려의 양면 외교를 중심으로-", 중앙아시아연구, 15, pp.189~216 (2010), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
- 첵메드 체렝도르지, "14세기 후반 동아시아의 국제정세와 북원과 고려의 관계", 박사, 한국사학, pp.고고학, 2011
- "‘홍무 23년’명 직물 마패", 서성호[URL]
- "직물 마패(馬牌), ‘부험(符驗)’"[URL]
- 許震童, "東湘集 卷7", ~
- "稗官雜記 卷1", ~
- "國書草錄", 장서각 K2-3468, ~
- Hafiz Abru, "A Persian Embassy to China", pp.15~18 (1970), Paragon Book
- "象院題語(奎7493) 遼東公幹", ~
- "事大文軌", ~
- "명종실록", ~
- 이재경, "명대 고려⋅조선에 대한 詔書 반포와 그 추이 - 洪武 연간에서 임진왜란 이전까지 -", 한국문화, (98), pp.185~223 (2022), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
- 金存敬, "竹溪集 卷2", 국립중앙도서관 古3648-10-838, ~
- 李光濤, "明淸檔案存眞選輯 初集", pp.110~ (1959), 中央研究院歷史語言研究所
- 李晩榮, "雪海遺稿 卷3, 崇禎丙子朝天錄", ~
- 許篈, "荷谷集 朝天記 中", ~
- "인조실록 권23", ~
- 이명미, "13~14세기 고려·몽골 관계 연구: 정동행성승상 부마 고려국왕, 그 복합적 위상에 대한 탐구" (2016), 혜안
- 정동훈, "명초 외교제도의 성립과 그 기원 - 고려-몽골 관계의 유산과 그 전유(專有) -", 역사와 현실, (113), pp.343~380 (2019), 한국역사연구회[DOI]
- 최종석, "조선초기 ‘時王之制’ 논의 구조의 특징과 중화 보편의 추구", 조선시대사학보, (52), pp.5~49 (2010), 조선시대사학회
- 최종석, "고려말기 『蕃國儀注』의 활용 양상과 그 성격", 한국문화, (92), pp.123~159 (2020), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
