본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

원복속기 고려 왕실 編制의 재정립: 同姓不婚 원칙의 流入과 封爵制 와해 과정을 중심으로

The Reestablishment of the Royal Organization System of the Goryeo Dynasty in the Process of Accepting ‘the Prohibition of Marriage between Persons with Same Surname (同姓不婚)’ in the 13th Century

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

This treatise aims at investigating how the endogamy system of the Goryeo royal family, which had provided a foundation of exclusive privileges for them, collapsed and the nobility system (封爵制) interconnected with this endogamy system was reestablished by active intervention of the Mongol empire. In 1275 and 1291, the Emperor Shizu of Yuan (Kublai Khan) criticized endogamy among the Goryeo royal family members as using a chinese terminology of ‘Dongseonghon (同姓婚)’. His argument against endogamy in 1275 was different from that in 1291. In 1275, the Emperor Shizu of Yuan regarded the Goryeo royal family as ‘one’ of noble houses in the Mongol empire because the king of the Goryeo at that time, the king Chungryeol, had got married with his daughter, the Princess Qutluqkelmish (齊國大長公主). The Emperor Shizu of Yuan emphasized that the Goryeo royal family had a duty to join the alliances among noble houses in his empire and showed special interest in marriages of the Goryeo royal women. But the king Chungryeol did not take any active actions for stimulating exogamy of the Goryeo royal women in contrast to his wife. His stance on their marriages changed only after 1291. At this time, the royal endogamy system of the Goryeo dynasty lost its authority and collapsed because of political pressure of the Emperor Shizu of Yuan and the logic considering the traditional marriage system of the Goryeo royal family as ‘barbarism’. After the Goryeo royal family accepted ‘the prohibition of marriage between persons with same surname’, its royal organization system became distinct from previous one in two spheres. First, level of contribution to the Goryeo-Mongol relations came to have great significance when qualifications and ranks of the royal family members were evaluated. Although special investitures were carried out for a few royal family members sent to the Mogolian military camp or capital from the period of war between the Goryeo and Mongol, the royal organization system, focused on plural kinship and marriage relations between the king and the other royal family members, was maintained. ‘The prohibition of marriage between persons with same surname’ emasculated this system, and in consequence, many members of the Goryeo royal family obtained royal ranks and privileges owing to the political status in the Mongol empire. Second, before the nobility system was completely replaced with Bongunje (封君制), which means the noble investiture system of kingdom (諸侯國), there already emerged a tendency of hereditary successions of royal ranks from father to son in the Goryeo nobility system.

Abstract

This treatise aims at investigating how the endogamy system of the Goryeo royal family, which had provided a foundation of exclusive privileges for them, collapsed and the nobility system (封爵制) interconnected with this endogamy system was reestablished by active intervention of the Mongol empire. In 1275 and 1291, the Emperor Shizu of Yuan (Kublai Khan) criticized endogamy among the Goryeo royal family members as using a chinese terminology of ‘Dongseonghon (同姓婚)’. His argument against endogamy in 1275 was different from that in 1291. In 1275, the Emperor Shizu of Yuan regarded the Goryeo royal family as ‘one’ of noble houses in the Mongol empire because the king of the Goryeo at that time, the king Chungryeol, had got married with his daughter, the Princess Qutluqkelmish (齊國大長公主). The Emperor Shizu of Yuan emphasized that the Goryeo royal family had a duty to join the alliances among noble houses in his empire and showed special interest in marriages of the Goryeo royal women. But the king Chungryeol did not take any active actions for stimulating exogamy of the Goryeo royal women in contrast to his wife. His stance on their marriages changed only after 1291. At this time, the royal endogamy system of the Goryeo dynasty lost its authority and collapsed because of political pressure of the Emperor Shizu of Yuan and the logic considering the traditional marriage system of the Goryeo royal family as ‘barbarism’. After the Goryeo royal family accepted ‘the prohibition of marriage between persons with same surname’, its royal organization system became distinct from previous one in two spheres. First, level of contribution to the Goryeo-Mongol relations came to have great significance when qualifications and ranks of the royal family members were evaluated. Although special investitures were carried out for a few royal family members sent to the Mogolian military camp or capital from the period of war between the Goryeo and Mongol, the royal organization system, focused on plural kinship and marriage relations between the king and the other royal family members, was maintained. ‘The prohibition of marriage between persons with same surname’ emasculated this system, and in consequence, many members of the Goryeo royal family obtained royal ranks and privileges owing to the political status in the Mongol empire. Second, before the nobility system was completely replaced with Bongunje (封君制), which means the noble investiture system of kingdom (諸侯國), there already emerged a tendency of hereditary successions of royal ranks from father to son in the Goryeo nobility system.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 황향주, "10-13세기 高麗 王室의 構造와 編制", 박사, pp.2022
  2. 채웅석, "고려중기 정치사의 재조명", pp.24~29 (2021), 일조각
  3. 盧明鎬, "高麗社會의 兩側的 親屬組織 硏究", 박사, 국사학, pp.1988
  4. 신인철, "한국의 사회구조: 미분화사회에서 부계사회로" (1995), 문덕사
  5. 黃雲龍, "高麗閥族硏究" (1989), 동아대학교출판부
  6. "고려사", ~
  7. 김용선, "역주 고려묘지명집성 上", pp.403~406 (2021), 한림대학교 출판부
  8. 국사편찬위원회, "고려시대사료데이터베이스", ~
  9. 김용선, "高麗墓誌銘集成" (2012), 한림대학교출판부
  10. "동국이상국집", ~
  11. 김기덕, "高麗時期 王室의 構成과 近親婚", 國史館論叢, 49, pp.12~ (1993)
  12. 김기덕, "高麗時代 封爵制 硏究" (1998), 청년사
  13. 최정환, "高麗時代 封爵制의 成立過程과 整備", 한국중세사연구, 14, pp.217~268 (2003), 한국중세사학회
  14. "고려사절요", ~
  15. 정용숙, "高麗王室族內婚硏究", pp.158~159 (1988), 새문사
  16. 권순형, "원 공주 출신 왕비의 정치권력 연구-충렬왕비 제국대장공주를 중심으로-", 사학연구, (77), pp.33~63 (2005), 한국사학회
  17. 김현라, "【연구논문】 고려 충렬왕비 齊國大長公主의 위상과 역할", 지역과 역사, (23), pp.71~100 (2008), 부경역사연구소
  18. 이명미, "고려에 下嫁해 온 몽골공주들의 정치적 위치와 고려-몽골 관계: 齊國大長公主의 사례를 중심으로", 이화사학연구, (54), pp.33~69 (2017), 이화사학연구소[DOI]
  19. 李益柱, "高麗·元關係의 構造와 高麗後期 政治體制", 박사, 국사학, pp.1996
  20. 최봉준, "특집 원간섭기 근친금혼 관념의 강화와 수계혼(收繼婚) 도입 시도", 역사와 현실, (99), pp.93~122 (2016), 한국역사연구회
  21. 죠지 피터 머독, "사회구조", pp.79~ (2004), 서경
  22. 박정석, "모방교차사촌혼(matrilateral cross-cousin marriage)에 관하여: 남인도 텔란가나(Telangana) 지역에서의 사례연구", 한국문화인류학, 32(1) (1999)
  23. 宇野伸浩, "チンギス・カン家の通婚関係にみられる対称的婚姻縁組", 國立民族學博物館硏究報告, (別冊20) (1999)
  24. 森平雅彦, "モンゴル覇権下の高麗: 帝國秩序と王国の対応", pp.107~117 (2013), 名古屋大学出版会
  25. "元史", ~
  26. 이종서, "고려ㆍ조선의 친족용어와 혈연의식: 친족관계의 정형과 변동" (2009), 신구문화사
  27. 이명미, "13~14세기 고려ㆍ몽골 관계 연구: 정동행성승상 부마 고려국왕, 그 복합적 위상에 대한 탐구" (2016), 혜안
  28. 이정란, "고려의 ‘不稱姓’의 특권과 王家", 역사와 담론, (85), pp.85~121 (2018), 호서사학회
  29. 민후기, "西周 五等爵制의 기원과 성격- 西周 金文의 분석을 중심으로", 중국학보, 51, pp.172~200 (2005), 한국중국학회
  30. 민후기, "西周왕조의 族의 재배치와 同姓不婚 - 東征 이후 西周王朝의 族 통일정책에 대한 검토 -", 동방학지, (153), pp.167~199 (2011), 국학연구원
  31. "삼국사기 권3", ~
  32. "益齋亂稿 권9下", ~
  33. "동문선 권26", ~
  34. "태종실록 권32", ~
  35. 장동익, "元에 진출한 高麗人", 민족문화논총, 11 (1990)
  36. 임형수, "13~14세기 高麗 官人層의 元都宿衛와 그 전개 양상", 역사와 담론, (86), pp.103~137 (2018), 호서사학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)