현대중국어 의문사 ‘甚麽’의 담화표지 기능
Discourse Functions of Interrogative ‘shenme’ in Modern Chinese
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study discussed that the interrogative word of modern Chinese, ‘shenme’ functions as a discourse marker in various discourse situations, and examined the discourse function of ‘shenme’ focusing on the speaker's attitude expression function and the discourse progression function. The main discourse functions of ‘shenme’ presented in this study are as follows. First, ‘shenme’ represents the speaker's uncertainty. The speaker expresses an attitude that it is difficult or uncertain to clearly explain the content of the speech through ‘shenme’. Second, the speaker uses ‘shenme’ to weaken his purpose or intention and express euphemism or an indifference attitude, and ‘shenme’ functions to weaken a speech. Third, the speaker shows a negative attitude toward the listener's opinion through ‘shenme’. These functions include making objections, expressing dissatisfaction, and expressing irony. Fourth, when the speaker tries to speak after the preceding speech, he uses the discourse marker ‘shenme’ to fill the time to build the speech, and maintains the conversation sequentially. Fifth, ‘shenme’ functions to recover the topics that converts the original topic to another topic or restores it back to the original topic without moving away from the topic.
Abstract
In this study discussed that the interrogative word of modern Chinese, ‘shenme’ functions as a discourse marker in various discourse situations, and examined the discourse function of ‘shenme’ focusing on the speaker's attitude expression function and the discourse progression function. The main discourse functions of ‘shenme’ presented in this study are as follows. First, ‘shenme’ represents the speaker's uncertainty. The speaker expresses an attitude that it is difficult or uncertain to clearly explain the content of the speech through ‘shenme’. Second, the speaker uses ‘shenme’ to weaken his purpose or intention and express euphemism or an indifference attitude, and ‘shenme’ functions to weaken a speech. Third, the speaker shows a negative attitude toward the listener's opinion through ‘shenme’. These functions include making objections, expressing dissatisfaction, and expressing irony. Fourth, when the speaker tries to speak after the preceding speech, he uses the discourse marker ‘shenme’ to fill the time to build the speech, and maintains the conversation sequentially. Fifth, ‘shenme’ functions to recover the topics that converts the original topic to another topic or restores it back to the original topic without moving away from the topic.
참고문헌 (26)
- 구종남, "담화표지 ‘뭐’의 문법화와 담화 기능", 국어문학, 35 (2000)
- 김명희, "국어 의문사의 담화표지화", 담화와 인지, 12(2), pp.41~64 (2005), 담화·인지언어학회
- 김명희, "국어 의문사 '무슨'의 담화표지 기능", 담화와 인지, 13(2), pp.21~42 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
- 김설화, "중국어 의문사의 원형범주와 확장범주: ‘甚麽’，‘谁’，‘哪儿’을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2019
- 김영철, "발표 담화에 나타난 담화표지의 기능-대학생들의 발표수업을 대상으로-", 어문론집, 50, pp.7~30 (2012), 중앙어문학회[DOI]
- 김은숙, "의문표현의 감동사적 용법에 관한 고찰: 일·한 양언어의 대조를 중심으로", 평택대학교 논문집, 16 (2002)
- 이정애, "국어 화용표지의 연구" (2002), 월인
- 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (2016), 한국문화사
- 이범열, "함축 부정 의문문에 관한 연구 - 의사소통의 관점에서 -", 동북아 문화연구, 1(59), pp.167~185 (2019), 동북아시아문화학회[DOI]
- 전영옥, "한국어 담화표지의 특징연구", 화법연구, 4 (2002)
- 정선혜, "한국어 학습자를 위한 한국어 담화표지 연구 : {글쎄}, {뭐}, {좀}을 중심으로", 석사, 외국어로서의한국어교육, pp.2006
- 정주연, "특지반어문에 사용된 의문사의 비의문용법 연구", 동아인문학, (25), pp.121~142 (2013), 동아인문학회
- 홍승아, "의문사의 기능 확대 용법", 한민족문화연구, 63(63), pp.247~272 (2018), 한민족문화학회[DOI]
- 陈虹先, "“没有甚麽+X”格式研究", 硕士, pp.2010
- 李宇鳳, "反問的回應類型與否定意義", 中國語文, (2) (2010)
- 鹿钦佞, "疑问代词“甚麽”非疑问用法的历时考察", 硕士, pp.2005
- 呂叔湘, "疑問·否定·肯定", 中國語文, (4) (1985)
- 石毓智, "語法的動因與機制" (2006), 北京大學出版社
- 王海峰, "自然口語中“甚麽”的話語分析", 漢語學習, (2) (2003)
- 邢福义, "现代汉语的特指性是非问", 语言教学与研究, (4) (1987)
- 邵敬敏, "現代漢語疑問句研究" (1996), 華東師範大學出版社
- Brinton, L., "Pragmatic makers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse functions" (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
- Canale, M., "Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing", Applied Linguistics, 1 (1980)
- Jucker, A., "The discorse maker well: A relevance-theoretical account", Journal of Pragmatics, 19 (1993)
- Schifrin, D., "Discourse markers" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Traugott, E., "Subjectification in grammaticalization : Subjectivity and Subjectivisation" (1995), Cambridge University Press