현대중국어 의문문의 간접 화행 사용과 의사소통 효과
A Study on the Use of Indirect Speech Acts of Interrogative Sentences and Communicative Effectiveness in Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to show the communicative effectiveness by using interrogative sentences as an indirect speech act conveying various meanings in the course of daily communication. First, yes-no questions with '不行吗?', '不可以嗎?', '不成吗?', etc. are often used to express politely meanings by lowering the speaker and treating the listener with respect. Second, wh-questions using '为什麽', '怎麽', '什麽', '誰', etc. are used to indirectly and euphemistically express the directive speech acts and the expressive speech acts that tend to threaten the listener's face. By expressing these speech acts indirectly and euphemistically the speaker can reduce not only the threat of the listener's face but also the listener’s stress and psychological burdens, through which the listener accepts the delivered contents. Third, A-not-A questions using ‘能不能’, ‘好不好’, ‘可不可以’, etc are used to indirectly convey ‘proposal’, ‘request’, ‘protest’, etc. The negative situation is presented in order to show humility by giving the listener a chance for refusal and avoiding the loss of the speaker's face in case the listener refuses.
Abstract
This study aims to show the communicative effectiveness by using interrogative sentences as an indirect speech act conveying various meanings in the course of daily communication. First, yes-no questions with '不行吗?', '不可以嗎?', '不成吗?', etc. are often used to express politely meanings by lowering the speaker and treating the listener with respect. Second, wh-questions using '为什麽', '怎麽', '什麽', '誰', etc. are used to indirectly and euphemistically express the directive speech acts and the expressive speech acts that tend to threaten the listener's face. By expressing these speech acts indirectly and euphemistically the speaker can reduce not only the threat of the listener's face but also the listener’s stress and psychological burdens, through which the listener accepts the delivered contents. Third, A-not-A questions using ‘能不能’, ‘好不好’, ‘可不可以’, etc are used to indirectly convey ‘proposal’, ‘request’, ‘protest’, etc. The negative situation is presented in order to show humility by giving the listener a chance for refusal and avoiding the loss of the speaker's face in case the listener refuses.
참고문헌 (31)
- 곽옥, "한국어와 중국어의 공손 표현 대조 연구", 석사, pp.2016
- 김정은, "한국어와 중국어의 공손표현 대조 분석 ― 부탁화행을 중심으로", 중국어문학논집, (62), pp.193~211 (2010), 중국어문학연구회
- 王銳, "한국어와 중국어의 의문문에 대한 화행이론적 대조 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2010
- 윤병노, "영어의 다중의문사 의문문에 관한 고찰", 언어과학, 15(2), pp.125~140 (2008), 한국언어과학회
- 윤비취, "중국어 공손표현 기제 연구", 한중언어문화연구, (45), pp.37~60 (2017), 한국중국언어문화연구회[DOI]
- 윤상희, "중국어 명령문의 공손화법 연구", 중국어문학논집, (117), pp.191~212 (2019), 중국어문학연구회
- 이사묘, "한·중 요청발화의 공손표현 연구", 석사, 국어국문학과 한국어학전공, pp.2013
- 임나, "한국어와 중국어의 요청 화행 대조 연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 전재영, "영어 의문사 의문문의 문미초점에 대한 한국 대학생들의 인식에 관한 연구", 언어과학, 26(4), pp.201~220 (2019), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- 정희자, "담화와 추론" (2004), 한국문화사
- 채춘옥, "한중언어에서 요청화행과 거절화행의 대조연구", 중어중문학, (62), pp.121~151 (2015), 한국중어중문학회
- 陳昌來, "從“有疑而問”到“無疑而問”-疑問句語法手段淺探", 烟台師範學院學報哲社版, 1, pp.50~58 (1993)
- 程誠, "漢語“請求”言語行為的句法表現、語用策略及其教學——以義大利漢語學習者為例", 석사, pp.2018
- 李虹, "請求言語行爲中的原型範疇", 辽宁工程技术大学学报：社会科学版, 13(6), pp.629~631 (2011)
- 梁婷, "請求策略中常規間接請求策略的語用分析", 貴陽學院學報(社會科學版), 3, pp.89~91 (2012)
- 劉靜元, "對間接言語行為的疑問句的中日對比研究", 석사, pp.2008
- 劉月華, "實用現代漢語語法(增訂本)" (2001), 商務印書院
- 陸儉明, "關於現代漢語裏的疑問語氣詞", 中國語文, 5, pp.330~337 (1984)
- 呂叔湘, "疑問·否定·肯定", 中國語文, 4, pp.241~250 (1985)
- 榮麗華, "從構式角度看漢語中的“X不X”", 語言教學與研究, 6, pp.73~80 (2012)
- 邵敬敏, "“是不是VP”問句的肯定性傾向及其類 型學意義", 世界漢語敎學, 3, pp.23~36 (2002)
- 譚軼操, "現代漢語疑問句語用研究", 석사, pp.2007
- 陶煉, "“是不是”問句說略", 中國語文, 2, pp.105~107 (1998)
- 王群, "俄漢語間接言語行爲對比硏究", 석사, pp.2009
- 徐冬梅, "“間接請求”言語行爲模式調査", 長春理工大學學報, 5(8), pp.98~100 (2010)
- 朱德熙, "語法講義" (1983), 商務印書院
- Austin, J. L, "How to Do Things with Words" (1962), Clarendon Press
- Brown, P, "Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction", pp.56~290 (1978), Cambridge University Press
- Gazdar, G, "Elements of Discourse Understanding", pp.64~83 (1981), Cambridge University Press
- Searle, J. R, "The Classification of Illocutionary Acts", Language in Society, 5, pp.1~23 (1976)
- Searle, J. R., "Expression and Meaning" (1979), Cambridge University Press