아베 정부의 ‘위안부’문제 인식과 한일관계의 딜레마
The Attitude of Abe Government on the “Comfort Women” Issue and the South Korea-Japan Relations Dilemma
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although the Abe administration tried to draw over the Park Geun-hye administration of ROK and reached an agreement with a certain concession, it did not solve the problem at all. Instead, it made the problem more complicated and ultimately failed to achieve its intended purpose. Since the Abe administration will not easily change the attitude of the “comfort women” issue, the President Moon is not easy to change the position of this issue, so the “comfort women” problem is difficult to be effectively resolved, and the Peace comfort woman statues continue to be increased in ROK. The issue of “comfort women” is not only a problem between Japan and ROK, but also an important historical issue in which China, DPRK, Philippines and other Asian countries that had suffered Japanese aggression and colonial rules have reconciled with Japan. The reconciliation of these historical issues cannot be solved by relying solely on the agreement between the governments, but by real reconciliation between the people. Since been in Japan's Prime Minister power, Shinzo Abe had been refusing to assume the legal responsibility for the ‘comfort women’(sex slaves) issue. On the one hand, he tried to deny the historical facts, on the other hand, took the South Korea's recognition with Japan's attitude on the issue as the prerequisite of relations improvement. Unfortunately, In this context of the new South Korean government advocated the issue should be renegotiated, the Japanese government had only achieved a ‘major but false diplomatic victory’ as the issue without ultimate resolution. Beyond all doubt, the relations between South Korea and Japan may once again fall into the historical predicament. As far as we can determine, the ‘comfort women’ issue would also act as a "time bomb" of impeding the reconciliation of Japan and South Korea for a long time.
Abstract
Although the Abe administration tried to draw over the Park Geun-hye administration of ROK and reached an agreement with a certain concession, it did not solve the problem at all. Instead, it made the problem more complicated and ultimately failed to achieve its intended purpose. Since the Abe administration will not easily change the attitude of the “comfort women” issue, the President Moon is not easy to change the position of this issue, so the “comfort women” problem is difficult to be effectively resolved, and the Peace comfort woman statues continue to be increased in ROK. The issue of “comfort women” is not only a problem between Japan and ROK, but also an important historical issue in which China, DPRK, Philippines and other Asian countries that had suffered Japanese aggression and colonial rules have reconciled with Japan. The reconciliation of these historical issues cannot be solved by relying solely on the agreement between the governments, but by real reconciliation between the people. Since been in Japan's Prime Minister power, Shinzo Abe had been refusing to assume the legal responsibility for the ‘comfort women’(sex slaves) issue. On the one hand, he tried to deny the historical facts, on the other hand, took the South Korea's recognition with Japan's attitude on the issue as the prerequisite of relations improvement. Unfortunately, In this context of the new South Korean government advocated the issue should be renegotiated, the Japanese government had only achieved a ‘major but false diplomatic victory’ as the issue without ultimate resolution. Beyond all doubt, the relations between South Korea and Japan may once again fall into the historical predicament. As far as we can determine, the ‘comfort women’ issue would also act as a "time bomb" of impeding the reconciliation of Japan and South Korea for a long time.
참고문헌 (26)
- "한일외무장관회담 결과(일본군 위안부피해자 문제관련 합의내용)" (2015)[URL]
- "문대통령, 아베에 “국민 대다수 위안부합의 정서상 수용못해" (2017)[URL]
- "더불어민주당 문재인 대표 180차 최고위원회" (2015)[URL]
- "일본 ‘위안부’문제와 아시아 여성기금 디지털기념관 홈페이지"[URL]
- "慰安婦関係調査結果発表に関する河野内閣官房長官談話" (1993)[URL]
- "村山内閣総理大臣談話(戦後50周年の終戦記念日にあたって)" (1995)[URL]
- "慰安婦問題関連年表"[URL]
- "日官房長官強調安倍政府不會修改“河野談話” (일본관방장관)" (2013)[URL]
- "慰安婦問題を巡る日韓間のやりとりの経緯~河野談話作成から アジア女性基金まで~" (2014)[URL]
- "慰安婦問題――事実関係の再検討と広まっている誤解" (2014)[URL]
- "慰安婦問題――さらに問題の核心を迫る" (2015)[URL]
- "日本新歷史教科書編撰會要求刪除慰安婦相關記述, 환구망(环球网)" (2014)[URL]
- "内閣総理大臣談話" (2015)[URL]
- "일본 역사학계, “아베, 위안부 피해자 존엄훼손 용납 못해", 동아일보, ~ (2014)
- "済州島で連行証言裏付け得られず虚偽と判断", 朝日新聞, ~ (2014)
- 安倍首相, "次は韓国が誠意を少女像撤去求める", 朝日新聞, ~ (2017)
- "安倍首相発言全文, 次世代に謝罪する宿命を背負わせない決意を実行", 産経新聞, ~ (2015)
- 문재인, "대한민국이 묻는다" (2017), 21세기Books
- 한국정신대문제대책협의회, "일본군 위안부 문제의 진상" (1997), 역사비평사
- 한국정신대문제대책협의회, "일본군 ‘위안부’문제의 책임을 묻는다" (2001), 풀빛
- 한국정신대문제대책협의회, "강제로 끌려간 조선인 군위안부들 1-3" (1999), 한울출판사
- 한국정신대문제대책협의회, "강제로 끌려간 조선인 군위안부들 4" (2001), 풀빛
- 大沼保昭, ""歴史認識"とはなにかー対立の構図を超えて" (2015), 中公新書
- 塚本壮一, "釜山総領事館前にも少女像設置の波紋", 東亜, (596) (2017)
- 苏智良, "我研究’慰安婦’問題的歷程", 史林 (2006)
- 사회과학출판사, "일제의 일본군 성 노예 범죄와 조선인 강제징용 진상조명 문헌자료집" (2017)
