시베리아 말타유적과 흑해북안 코스텐키 1유적의 여성형상물(비너스상)비교고찰
A comparative study of female formations of Siberian Malta site and Black Sea Kostenki I site
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The female figure called "Venus" is mainly excavated in Siberia and Europe since the late Paleolithic. The ruins of Malta in Siberia and the Kostenki I in the Don river basin of the Black Sea in Europe are well known and compared.This work is a data analysis to compare the data of Eurasia, Northeast China, Far East, and Korean Peninsula over the Neolithic and Bronze Ages. The well-known residence of the Venus statue in the Malta ruins of Siberia is a circular tent residential area.As a residential settlement, the tomb of a young child is known inside this residence. In Malta ruins, female figurines were excavated not only in this settlement but also in other settlements. On the other hand, the number 1 residence of the ruins of Kostenki I was much larger than that of the No. 2 residence in which the Venus statue was excavated. In both regions, there are differences in material, femininity, flaccidity, bodily expression, l ower body, wearing clothing, and damages.The Siberian Women's Prize was produced only in the mammoth ivory, with a large head and many eye-catching images.On the other hand, the Don river basin was made of mammoths and limestones, and the breasts, belly and pelvis were exaggerated and greatly expressed. In Siberia and the Black Sea North, female figurines starting to be excavated from the late Paleolithic period have the same idea of placing female figurines in the residential areas, but implies that the producers of both regions had different views on women.
Abstract
The female figure called "Venus" is mainly excavated in Siberia and Europe since the late Paleolithic. The ruins of Malta in Siberia and the Kostenki I in the Don river basin of the Black Sea in Europe are well known and compared.This work is a data analysis to compare the data of Eurasia, Northeast China, Far East, and Korean Peninsula over the Neolithic and Bronze Ages. The well-known residence of the Venus statue in the Malta ruins of Siberia is a circular tent residential area.As a residential settlement, the tomb of a young child is known inside this residence. In Malta ruins, female figurines were excavated not only in this settlement but also in other settlements. On the other hand, the number 1 residence of the ruins of Kostenki I was much larger than that of the No. 2 residence in which the Venus statue was excavated. In both regions, there are differences in material, femininity, flaccidity, bodily expression, l ower body, wearing clothing, and damages.The Siberian Women's Prize was produced only in the mammoth ivory, with a large head and many eye-catching images.On the other hand, the Don river basin was made of mammoths and limestones, and the breasts, belly and pelvis were exaggerated and greatly expressed. In Siberia and the Black Sea North, female figurines starting to be excavated from the late Paleolithic period have the same idea of placing female figurines in the residential areas, but implies that the producers of both regions had different views on women.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김재윤, "선사시대의 극동전신상 토우와 환동해문화권", 한국상고사학보, 60(60), pp.41~72 (2008), 한국상고사학회
- 김재윤, "북방 유라시아 제사 고고학의 현황과 과제", pp.147~171 (2018)
- 今村佳子, "中國新石器時代の偶像", 中國考古學, (2) (2002)
- Абрамова З.А, "палеолитическое искусство на территории СССр", pp.86~ (1962), Наука
- Абрамова З.А, "Aнтропоморфные изображения", pp.28~36 (1987)
- Абрамова З.А, "Каталог по материалам палеолитическ ого искусства европы", pp.304~ (2010), петербургское востоковедение
- Абрамрва З.А, "Палеоит СССР", pp.328~329 (1984), НАУКА
- Д. Дюпюи, "Верхний палеолит: образы, символы, знаки: Ката лог предметов искусства малых форм и уникальных находок верхнего палеолита из археологического собрания МАЭ РАН", pp.338~353 (2016)
- Гаврилов,К.Н, "новая женская статуэтка со стоянки хотылево 2 изолир ованные канон и археологический контекст", Camera praehistorica, 1(1), pp.8~23 (2018)
- Герасимов М.М, "Круглое жилище стоянка Мальта", Краткие сообщения ИА РАН, 82, pp.128~134 (1961)
- Н. Гутас, "Новые данные о восточном граветте: взгляд на костяную индустрию, Пред меты вооружения и искусства из кости в древних культурах Северной Евразии (тех нологический и функциональный аспекты): замятнинский сборник", pp.27~47 (2011)
- Ефименко П. П, "Костенки I. Институт истории материальной культуры", pp.452~ (1958), М.Л. Издат ельство Академии наук СССР
- Синицын А. А, "Радиоуглеродная хронология палеолита Восточной Европы и Северной Азии. Проблемы и перспективы", pp.21~66 (1997)
- Левин М.Г, "К вопросу о древнейшем заселении Сибирии", Советская этнография, 3, pp.159~160 (1950)
- Окладников А.П, "Палеолитические жилище в Бурети", pp.1~10 (1941), Палеолит и неолит СССР
- Синицын А. А, "Радиоуглеродная хронология палеолита Восто чной Европы и Северной Азии" (1997), Проблемы и перспективы
- Хлопачев. Г.А, "Верхний палеолит: образы, символы, знаки: Кат алог предметов искусства малых форм и уникальных находок верхнего палеолита из археологического собрания МАЭ РАН", pp.68~146 (2016)
- Формозов, "К характеристике палеолитического поселения Мальта", Советская Археол огия, (2), pp.205~209 (1976)