김수영과 베이다오 산문에 나타난 참여의식 비교연구
A Comparative Study of Consciousness of Participation by Prose KimSu-young (金洙暎) and Bei Dao (北島)
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to make a traced comparison following the trend of social change for the participation awareness as the common characteristics displayed in the essays of Kim Su-young who is known as the representative poem of participatory poem during 1960s in Korea and Bei Dao who is known as the representative poem of misty poetry in 1980s in China. These two poets were the representative runners of the participatory poems with clear foot print in the literature history, and their essays also have undertaken an important role in displaying their activities and ideologies as the participatory poets. Through the essay collection of Bei Dao, it displayed the activities and life style of Bei Dao after his defection as well as tracing down on what influence would the people he met in his exile and incidents he experienced on the participation awareness of Bei Dao. If there is a difference, Kim Su-young structured the theory on his participatory poetry mainly through the essays but Bei Dao expanded the participation awareness through his life on exile and record on people of exile while displaying the activities of participation as an activist poet. Under this article, their participation awareness as appeared on their essays is compared in three aspects. First, it is the part that the discourse was undertaken (Kim Su-young) on participation literature through essays and records his activities as a participation poet after the revolution in essays. Kim Su-young strenuously asserted his opinion on participatory poems on his essay in 1968 and further dissipated his theory on participatory poetry as well. Bei Dao did not personally mentioned, but through visiting the conflict areas, he occasionally implied the possibility of participation through verbal expression. Second, (it also forms an axis in poetry) it would be the criticism on daily lives where the capitalism has penetrated and this is also deemed as a way of participation.
Abstract
This study aims to make a traced comparison following the trend of social change for the participation awareness as the common characteristics displayed in the essays of Kim Su-young who is known as the representative poem of participatory poem during 1960s in Korea and Bei Dao who is known as the representative poem of misty poetry in 1980s in China. These two poets were the representative runners of the participatory poems with clear foot print in the literature history, and their essays also have undertaken an important role in displaying their activities and ideologies as the participatory poets. Through the essay collection of Bei Dao, it displayed the activities and life style of Bei Dao after his defection as well as tracing down on what influence would the people he met in his exile and incidents he experienced on the participation awareness of Bei Dao. If there is a difference, Kim Su-young structured the theory on his participatory poetry mainly through the essays but Bei Dao expanded the participation awareness through his life on exile and record on people of exile while displaying the activities of participation as an activist poet. Under this article, their participation awareness as appeared on their essays is compared in three aspects. First, it is the part that the discourse was undertaken (Kim Su-young) on participation literature through essays and records his activities as a participation poet after the revolution in essays. Kim Su-young strenuously asserted his opinion on participatory poems on his essay in 1968 and further dissipated his theory on participatory poetry as well. Bei Dao did not personally mentioned, but through visiting the conflict areas, he occasionally implied the possibility of participation through verbal expression. Second, (it also forms an axis in poetry) it would be the criticism on daily lives where the capitalism has penetrated and this is also deemed as a way of participation.
참고문헌 (41)
- 김수영, "全集Ⅱ-산문" (1993), 민음사
- 北岛, "青灯" (2009), 牛浸大学出版社
- 北岛, "午夜之门" (2009), 牛浸大学出版社
- 北岛, "蓝房子" (2009), 牛浸大学出版社
- 北岛, "时间的玫瑰" (2009), 牛浸大学出版社
- 北岛, "失败之书" (2009), 牛浸大学出版社
- 도시사연구회, "공간 속의 시간" (2007), 심산출판사
- 류동민, "서울은 어떻게 작동하는가" (2014), 코난북스
- 앙리 르페브르, "공간의 생산" (2011), 에코리브르
- 캐롤린 스틸, "음식, 도시의 운명을 가르다" (2010), 예지
- 권오훈, "한국의 산업화 과정과 기업이데올로기", 사회과학논총, 9 (1990), 한양대학교 사회과학대학
- 이미나, "김수영 산문에 나타난 ‘불온’의 논리 고찰", 인문사회 21, 9(6), pp.899~912 (2018), 인문사회 21[DOI]
- 이미옥, "베이다오(北島) 산문 연구 1 - 『자정의 문(午夜之門)』을 중심으로", 세계문학비교연구, (61), pp.109~126 (2017), 세계문학비교학회
- 엄경희, "金洙暎 詩人의 ‘生活’과 ‘藝術’에 대한 思辨의 力學性 - 散文 分析을 中心으로 -", 어문연구(語文硏究), 43(4), pp.265~295 (2015), 한국어문교육연구회[DOI]
- 이찬, "김수영 산문에 나타난 알레고리적 방법론과 전복적 사유", 현대문학이론연구, (59), pp.227~253 (2014), 현대문학이론학회
- 장석원, "김수영 시에 나타난 “산문성”의 의의", 어문논집, 44 (2001), 민족어문학회
- 唐曉渡, "我一直在寫作中尋找方向—北島訪談錄", 詩探索 (2003)
- 北島, "失敗之書(附錄)" (2004), 汕頭大學出版社
- 王寅, "北島:失敗者是沒有真正歸屬的人", 第一財經日報, ~ (2004)
- 唐曉渡, "傳統就像血緣的召喚—北島訪談錄", 詩潮, ~ (2004)
- 陳樹義, "<今天>的故事—北島訪談錄南方都市報", 南方都市報, ~ (2008)
- 林思浩, "我的記憶之城—北島訪談錄", 南方周末, ~ (2009)
- 劉溜, "北島：靠“強硬的文學精神”突破重圍", 經濟觀察報, ~ (2009)
- 劉子超, "北島此刻離故土最近", 南方人物周刊, ~ (2009)
- 石劍峰, "北島談當代漢語詩歌的困境", 東方早報, ~ (2010)
- 陳昶, "北島海外散文創作論", 碩士, pp.2010
- 蘭越, "北島散文論", 碩士, pp.2013
- 高霞, "北島散文創作研究", 碩士, pp.2013
- 劉靜靜, "北島散文創作論", 碩士, pp.2013
- 顧曉莉, "流亡語境下北島的散文創作研究", 碩士, pp.2016
- 奚旺, "試論北島散文的文體建樹", 大眾文藝(理論) (2008)
- 李陀, "一顆溫潤明亮的珍珠", 風光(空港商旅) (2009)
- 何同彬, "浮遊的守夜人—從北島午夜之門談起", 翠苑 (2011)
- 謝有順, "作家與作品，漂泊者的歸程與迷途—北島散文論", 中國現代文學研究叢刊 (2013)
- 傅元峰, "加入這場陰影的遊戲—于堅散文印象", 青春 (2014)
- 亞思明, "“流散”語境下北島隨筆的“失敗”美學", 中國現代文學研究叢刊 (2015)
- 劉雲春, "現代性失語與母語還鄉—論北島近年的離散散文", 當代文壇 (2016)
- 李少威, "詩人的迷狂與“詩人”的癔症", 南風窗 (2016)
- 柯雷, "旅居國外的詩人:楊煉、王家新、北島", 文藝爭鳴 (2017)
- 張志雄, "光明的未來—時間的玫瑰—但斌投資劄記序", 股市動態分析 (2007)
- 劉雲春, "現代性失語與母語還鄉—論北島近年的離散散文", 創作研究·當代文壇 (2017)