김수영과 베이다오의 ‘참여시’ 비교 연구- 주체의 대응방식을 중심으로 -
Comparison Kim Suyoung and Beidao’s ‘Resistant Poems’
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Both Kim Suyoung and Beidao worked actively as the poets of the people and also modernism during the 1960’s to 80’s. And they had some things in common as both of them were born before or after the national independence, belonged to the class of intellects, and were representative poets of the people and modernism symbolizing the 1960’s to 1970’s. Not abandoning their aspects as modernists, they properly utilized metaphor, symbol, the alteration of view, or montage technique and destroyed the order of time and space to realize poems of participation in their own ways differentiated from those used by other poets to write their poems of the people. Moreover, their poems are not confined in the trend of ‘modernism’, but still show the aspects connected with reality by accepting conventional modernism creatively as well as critically. These poets who were the subjects of resistance during the 1960 to 80’s in Korea and China separately had to adopt some other way differentiated from the former. For instance, Korean poets of the people including Kim Suyoung changed from individual-oriented discourse to people-oriented discourse while Chinese resistant poets like Beidao converted from ‘the people’-oriented socialistic community discourse to individual-oriented discourse against the former. Both of them did open the first door to resistance by forming the subject in a different way from what their own national system adopted.
Abstract
Both Kim Suyoung and Beidao worked actively as the poets of the people and also modernism during the 1960’s to 80’s. And they had some things in common as both of them were born before or after the national independence, belonged to the class of intellects, and were representative poets of the people and modernism symbolizing the 1960’s to 1970’s. Not abandoning their aspects as modernists, they properly utilized metaphor, symbol, the alteration of view, or montage technique and destroyed the order of time and space to realize poems of participation in their own ways differentiated from those used by other poets to write their poems of the people. Moreover, their poems are not confined in the trend of ‘modernism’, but still show the aspects connected with reality by accepting conventional modernism creatively as well as critically. These poets who were the subjects of resistance during the 1960 to 80’s in Korea and China separately had to adopt some other way differentiated from the former. For instance, Korean poets of the people including Kim Suyoung changed from individual-oriented discourse to people-oriented discourse while Chinese resistant poets like Beidao converted from ‘the people’-oriented socialistic community discourse to individual-oriented discourse against the former. Both of them did open the first door to resistance by forming the subject in a different way from what their own national system adopted.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김유중, "한국모더니즘문학의 세계관과 역사의식" (1996), 태학사
- 정주광, "북도시선" (2003), 문이재
- 염무웅, "민중시대의 문학" (1991), 창비
- 이상갑, "한국문학과 시대의 상상력" (2003), 연극과인간
- 이승훈, "한국모더니즘 시사" (2000), 문예출판사
- 이승훈, "모더니즘의 비판적 수용" (2002), 작가
- 김유중, "김수영 시의 모더니티―모더니티에 대한 새로운 이해", 한중인문학연구, (18) (2006), 한중인문학회
- 김현, "자유의 꿈, In 거대한 뿌리" (1974), 민음사
- 박남용, "중국인 디아스포라 베이다오 北島의 시적 이미지 연구", 외국문학연구, (28), pp.147~166 (2007), 외국문학연구소
- 박종숙, "“현대주의”와 서정의 “몽롱시”", 중국학논총 (1993), 한국중국문학학회
- 이경덕, "근대성과 모더니즘―프레드릭 제임슨의 모더니즘론", 세계의 문학, (69) (1993), 민음사
- 이기성, "1960년대 시와 근대적 주체의 두 양상-김수영, 신동엽 시를 중심으로, In 1960년대 문학연구" (1998), 깊은샘
- 정성은, "모더니즘과 몽롱시", 중어중문학, 12 (1990), 중어중문학회
- 한용군, "시의 일상성에 관한 연구", 겨레어문학, 35 (2005), 겨레어문학회
- 北岛, "关与诗, In 北島詩选會編" (1982), 上海文藝出版社
- 翟頔, "中文是我惟一的行李─北島訪談" (1991), 東方
- 許子東, "現代主義與中國新時期文學", 文學評論, 4 (1989)
- 石天河, "關於朦朧詩的三味, 三度及三品" (1982), 詩探索
- 謝冕, "失去了平靜以後" (1980), 詩刊
- 郭玉洁, "北岛:变革年代的诗人" (1994), 靑年