1960-1980년대 한․중 모더니즘 시의 지향성 비교연구
A Comparative Study of the Direction of Modernism in Korea and China in the 1960s and 1980s
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis compared the directivity of Korean and Chinese modernism poetry of the 1960s to the 1980s focusing on the coterie ≪Modern Poetry≫ of Korea and the coterie ≪Today≫ of China. Behind the comparison of these two motives are the April 19th Revolution of Korea and Tiananmen Square protests of China, which were important turning points in the preparation of modernity. The two revolutions were the first democratic revolutions since liberation and they had a symbolic effect on modern history and literary history and this connected with movements for modernism of the West and gave birth to unique thoughts of modernism. The coterie magazines ≪Modern Poetry≫ and ≪Today≫ were created to allow people to voice their thoughts and establish their literary positions after the first democratic revolution failed after liberation in an atmosphere of national censorship. Their greatest role was to create autonomous literary fields in which attempts could be made for pure poetic explorations in a time when realistic participation was desperately needed and to secure diversity. Modern poetry coteries particularly pry into the unconscious, or in other words, the inner consciousness and their goal was a combination of lyricism and modernity. Their internal world was in the form of individual illusions created through language and the illusions they pursue were progressed with as explorations into pure individual unconsciousness and not as reflections of reality or participation. Also, they accept modernism techniques but establish their own poetics instead of settling for a single form of esthetics and they promoted active language experiments. The psalms of coteries can be distinguished from the ‘internal worlds’ of previous poems of modernism from aspects that they are the acquisition of self-sustaining internality that possesses modernistic material foundations. Compared to this, modernism poetry of China actively utilized modernism from aspects of technique but there are many aspects of reality reflection from aspects of content. Chinese poets read books related to modernism in secret through underground reading and this became nourishment for the creation of modernism poetry. They borrowed various modernism techniques such as metaphors, montages, and automatic techniques to reveal the contradictions of suppressed realities and this was called “misty poetry” and appeared as contemporary literary thought. Ultimately, misty poetry is another name for engagement poetry that borrows modernism techniques and its modernism is similar to historical modernity that is based on historical reality.
Abstract
This thesis compared the directivity of Korean and Chinese modernism poetry of the 1960s to the 1980s focusing on the coterie ≪Modern Poetry≫ of Korea and the coterie ≪Today≫ of China. Behind the comparison of these two motives are the April 19th Revolution of Korea and Tiananmen Square protests of China, which were important turning points in the preparation of modernity. The two revolutions were the first democratic revolutions since liberation and they had a symbolic effect on modern history and literary history and this connected with movements for modernism of the West and gave birth to unique thoughts of modernism. The coterie magazines ≪Modern Poetry≫ and ≪Today≫ were created to allow people to voice their thoughts and establish their literary positions after the first democratic revolution failed after liberation in an atmosphere of national censorship. Their greatest role was to create autonomous literary fields in which attempts could be made for pure poetic explorations in a time when realistic participation was desperately needed and to secure diversity. Modern poetry coteries particularly pry into the unconscious, or in other words, the inner consciousness and their goal was a combination of lyricism and modernity. Their internal world was in the form of individual illusions created through language and the illusions they pursue were progressed with as explorations into pure individual unconsciousness and not as reflections of reality or participation. Also, they accept modernism techniques but establish their own poetics instead of settling for a single form of esthetics and they promoted active language experiments. The psalms of coteries can be distinguished from the ‘internal worlds’ of previous poems of modernism from aspects that they are the acquisition of self-sustaining internality that possesses modernistic material foundations. Compared to this, modernism poetry of China actively utilized modernism from aspects of technique but there are many aspects of reality reflection from aspects of content. Chinese poets read books related to modernism in secret through underground reading and this became nourishment for the creation of modernism poetry. They borrowed various modernism techniques such as metaphors, montages, and automatic techniques to reveal the contradictions of suppressed realities and this was called “misty poetry” and appeared as contemporary literary thought. Ultimately, misty poetry is another name for engagement poetry that borrows modernism techniques and its modernism is similar to historical modernity that is based on historical reality.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김준오, "현대시의 추상화와 절대 은유", 현대시사상, (가을) (1995)
- 김지선, "한국 모더니즘시의 서술기법과 주체 인식 연구 : 김춘수, 오규원, 이승훈 시를 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2009
- 김유중, "한․중․일 삼국의 모더니즘 문학에 대한 개념적 비교 연구", 한중인문학연구, (56), pp.1~20 (2017), 한중인문학회[DOI]
- 김홍진, "내면 탐구와 언어 실험- 이승훈론 -", 한국문예비평연구, (19), pp.55~82 (2006), 한국현대문예비평학회
- 권영민, "한국현대문학사2" (2007), 민음사
- 박슬기, "전봉건 시론에 있어서 시의 현대성", 관악어문연구, 30 (2005), 서울대학교 국어국문학과
- 서진영, "1960년대 모더니즘 시의 공간의식 연구", 박사, 국문학, pp.2005
- 유창민, "1960년대 신진 시인의 동인 활동 경향과 세대적특수성", 인문학연구, 56(1), pp.165~192 (2017), 인문과학연구소
- 이경하, "1920~30년대 韓中 현대시의 ‘모더니즘’ 수용 양상 비교", 중국어문학지, (33), pp.195~248 (2010), 중국어문학회
- 이광호, "4.19와 모더니티" (2010), 문학과지성사
- 이미옥, "김수영과 베이다오의 참여의식 비교연구" (2016), 박문사
- 이승하, "한국현대문학시사" (2010), 소명출판
- 임환모, "1960년대 한국문학의 분기 현상", 현대문학이론연구, (58), pp.375~395 (2014), 현대문학이론학회
- 정성은, "20世纪30年代韩中现代主义诗人比较研究 - 以郑芝溶和戴望舒的现代性与传统意识为中心", 중국어문학지, (25), pp.455~476 (2007), 중국어문학회
- 진중권, "(진중권의) 서양미술사." (2013), 휴머니스트 출판그룹
- 최라영, "현대시 동인의 시세계" (2006), 예옥
- 하정일, "1960년대 문학연구" (1998)
- Fan. Weili, "초창기 한․중 상징주의 시의 비교연구: 김억과 李金髮의 초기시를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2008
- 천쓰허, "중국당대문학사" (2020), 문학동네
- 꾸청, "나는 제멋대로야" (1997), 실천문학사
- 北岛, "今天" (1978), 代发刊词
- 朱棟霖, "中國現代文學史1917~1997" (1999), 高等教育出版社
- 郭玉洁, "生活" (2008)
- 王明伟, "争鸣" (1985), 香港
