본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Cross-Cultural Translation and Validation of the Thai Version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA-TH)

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective: To culturally adapt the original English Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia to Thai (SARA-TH) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the SARA-TH in assessing ataxia in acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients, as assessed by three healthcare professionals.Methods: The SARA underwent translation and cross-cultural adaptation to Thai according to established guidelines. Reliability (e.g., internal consistency, intrarater reliability, interrater reliability) and validity (e.g., content validity, convergent validity) were assessed in a sample of 50 participants with ataxia after acute ischemic stroke or TIA. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between the SARA-TH and the Barthel Index (BI-TH), the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS-TH), and the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) to assess convergent validity. Interrater and intrarater reliability among experienced and novice neurologists, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists were assessed using weighted kappa.Results: The SARA-TH demonstrated good comprehension and exhibited no significant floor or ceiling effects. It showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α≥0.776). Significant correlations were found between the SARA-TH score and the BI-TH score (rs=-0.743 to -0.665), NIHSS- TH score (rs=0.404–0.513), and ICARS score (rs=0.859–0.917). The intrarater reliability for each rater ranged from 0.724 to 1.000 (p<0.01), and the interrater reliability varied from 0.281 to 0.927 (p<0.01).Conclusion: The SARA-TH has excellent internal consistency, validity, and intrarater reliability, as well as acceptable interrater reliability among health professionals with varying levels of experience. It is recommended for assessing ataxia severity in individuals following acute ischemic stroke or TIA.

Abstract

Objective: To culturally adapt the original English Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia to Thai (SARA-TH) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of the SARA-TH in assessing ataxia in acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients, as assessed by three healthcare professionals.Methods: The SARA underwent translation and cross-cultural adaptation to Thai according to established guidelines. Reliability (e.g., internal consistency, intrarater reliability, interrater reliability) and validity (e.g., content validity, convergent validity) were assessed in a sample of 50 participants with ataxia after acute ischemic stroke or TIA. Spearman correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between the SARA-TH and the Barthel Index (BI-TH), the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS-TH), and the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) to assess convergent validity. Interrater and intrarater reliability among experienced and novice neurologists, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists were assessed using weighted kappa.Results: The SARA-TH demonstrated good comprehension and exhibited no significant floor or ceiling effects. It showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α≥0.776). Significant correlations were found between the SARA-TH score and the BI-TH score (rs=-0.743 to -0.665), NIHSS- TH score (rs=0.404–0.513), and ICARS score (rs=0.859–0.917). The intrarater reliability for each rater ranged from 0.724 to 1.000 (p<0.01), and the interrater reliability varied from 0.281 to 0.927 (p<0.01).Conclusion: The SARA-TH has excellent internal consistency, validity, and intrarater reliability, as well as acceptable interrater reliability among health professionals with varying levels of experience. It is recommended for assessing ataxia severity in individuals following acute ischemic stroke or TIA.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Mariotti C, "An overview of the patient with ataxia", J Neurol, 252, pp.511~518 (2005)
  2. Ashizawa T, "Ataxia", Continuum(Minneap Minn), 22(4Movement Disorders), pp.1208~1226 (2016)
  3. "Ataxia" (2023)[URL]
  4. Stanley WJ, "Cost of cerebellar ataxia in Hong Kong : a retrospective cost-ofillness analysis", Front Neurol, 11, pp.711~ (2020)
  5. Schmitz-Hübsch T, "Reliability and validity of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale : a study in 156 spinocerebellar ataxia patients", Mov Disord, 21, pp.699~704 (2006)
  6. Schmitz-Hübsch T, "Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : development of a new clinical scale", Neurology, 66, pp.1717~1720 (2006)
  7. Weyer A, "Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia : a study in 64 ataxia patients", Mov Disord, 22, pp.1633~1637 (2007)
  8. Braga-Neto P, "Translation and validation into Brazilian version of the Scale of the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia(SARA)", Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 68, pp.228~230 (2010)
  9. Sato K, "Reliability of the Japanese version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)", Brain Nerve, 61, pp.591~595 (2009)
  10. Tan S, "Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia", Chin Med J(Engl), 126, pp.2045~2048 (2013)
  11. Kim BR, "Korean version of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia in ataxic stroke patients", Ann Rehabil Med, 38, pp.742~751 (2014)
  12. Bourcier D, "French translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia", Cerebellum, 22, pp.1118~1122 (2023)
  13. Beaton DE, "Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 25, pp.3186~3191 (2000)
  14. "COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments" (2019)[URL]
  15. Easton JD, "Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association", American Stroke Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia;Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists, 2009, pp.40, 2276~2293
  16. Folstein MF, ""Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician", J Psychiatr Res, 12, pp.189~198 (1975)
  17. Green J, "A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients", Disabil Rehabil, 23, pp.670~676 (2001)
  18. Duffy L, "Reliability(inter-rater agreement)of the Barthel Index for assessment of stroke survivors : systematic review and meta-analysis", Stroke, 44, pp.462~468 (2013)
  19. Dajpratham P, "The inter-rater reliability of Barthel Index(Thai version)in stroke patients", J Thai Rehabil, 16, pp.1~9 (2006)
  20. Brott T, "Measurements of acute cerebral infarction : a clinical examination scale", Stroke, 20, pp.864~870 (1989)
  21. Farooque U, "Validity of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for severity of stroke to predict mortality among patients presenting with symptoms of stroke", Cureus, 12, pp.e10255~ (2020)
  22. Nilanont Y, "Establishment of the Thai version of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS)and a validation study", J Med Assoc Thai, 93(Suppl 1), pp.S171~S178 (2010)
  23. Subramony SH, "SARA--a new clinical scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia", Nat Clin Pract Neurol, 3, pp.136~137 (2007)
  24. Saute JA, "Ataxia rating scales--psychometric profiles, natural history and their application in clinical trials", Cerebellum, 11, pp.488~504 (2012)
  25. McHorney CA, "Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice : are available health status surveys adequate?", Qual Life Res, 4, pp.293~307 (1995)
  26. Sedgwick P, "Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient", BMJ, 349, pp.g7327~ (2014)
  27. Akoglu H, "User’s guide to correlation coefficients", Turk J Emerg Med, 18, pp.91~93 (2018)
  28. Taber KS, "The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education", Res Sci Educ, 48, pp.1273~1296 (2018)
  29. McHugh ML, "Interrater reliability : the kappa statistic", Biochem Med(Zagreb), 22, pp.276~282 (2012)
  30. Rummey C, "Harmonizing results of ataxia rating scales : mFARS, SARA, and ICARS", Ann Clin Transl Neurol, 9, pp.2041~2046 (2022)
  31. "Outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation" (2013)[URL]
  32. Tavakol M, "Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha", Int J Med Educ, 2, pp.53~55 (2011)
  33. Chien CW, "Intra-and Inter-rater reliability of the assessment of children’s hand skills based on video recordings", Br J Occup Ther, 77, pp.82~90 (2014)
  34. Grobe-Einsler M, "Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia(SARA) : development of a training tool and certification program", Cerebellum, 23, pp.877~880 (2024)

관련 논문AI추천

Korean Version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in Ataxic Stroke Patients이종민, 정희연, Bo-Ram Kim, Jin-Youn Lee, Min Jeong Kim대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2014 · 제38권 제6호Evaluation of Ataxia in Mild Ischemic Stroke Patients Using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)김현동, 배현우, 엄미자, 정상훈, 최성원, 한나미대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2018 · 제42권 제3호Construction of the Mobility to Participation Assessment Scale for Stroke (MPASS) and Testing Its Validity and Reliability in Persons With Stroke in ThailandJiraphat Nawarat, Kanda Chaipinyo대한예방의학회 · 예방의학회지2022 · 제55권 제4호Validity and Reliability of a Korean Version of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale정산, 고임석, 김향희, 신준현, 오미선, 유경호, 이병철, 이주헌, 조수진, 최휘철대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2012 · 제8권 제3호The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity EvaluationCho Inyong, Choi Yujin, Hwang Jae Woong, Hwang Sung Hwan, Kim Eun-Hye, Kim Tae-lim, Lee Jung Ah, Lee Wang Jae, Park Jin Ho, Shin Joon-Ho대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2021 · 제45권 제2호Validity and Reliability of the Thai Version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire in Individuals With Parkinson’s diseaseArisa Taweekitikul, Fuengfa Khobkhun, Phakamas Tanvijit, Pheeravut Tantisuvanitchkul, Piyapong Akkathep, Prachaya Srivanitchapoom, Yuvadee Pitakpatapee대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2023 · 제47권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)