본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Construction of the Mobility to Participation Assessment Scale for Stroke (MPASS) and Testing Its Validity and Reliability in Persons With Stroke in Thailand

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: This study was conducted to develop the Mobility to Participation Assessment Scale for Stroke (MPASS) and assess its content validity, internal consistency, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, and convergent validity in people with stroke living in the community. Methods: The MPASS was developed using published data on mobility-related activity and participation timing in elderly individuals, and then reviewed by community physical therapists. Content validity was established by reaching a consensus of experienced physical therapists in a focus group. The MPASS was scored for 32 participants with stroke (mean age 61.75±4.92 years) by 3 individual testers. Reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency using the Cronbach alpha coefficient (α), and convergent validity using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) to compare the MPASS to the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index as a referent test of mobility. Results: The MPASS consists of 8 items, and its scoring system provides information on the ability of people with stroke to reach a movement level enabling them to live in society, including interactions with other people and safe living in the community. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were excellent (ICC, 0.948; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.893 to 0.982 and ICC, 0.967; 95% CI, 0.933 to 0.989, respectively). Internal consistency was good (α=0.877). The convergent validity was moderate (r=0.646; p<0.001). Conclusions: The newly developed MPASS showed acceptable construct validity and high reliability. The MPASS is suitable for use in people with stroke, especially those who have been discharged and live in the community with the ability to initiate sitting.

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to develop the Mobility to Participation Assessment Scale for Stroke (MPASS) and assess its content validity, internal consistency, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, and convergent validity in people with stroke living in the community. Methods: The MPASS was developed using published data on mobility-related activity and participation timing in elderly individuals, and then reviewed by community physical therapists. Content validity was established by reaching a consensus of experienced physical therapists in a focus group. The MPASS was scored for 32 participants with stroke (mean age 61.75±4.92 years) by 3 individual testers. Reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), internal consistency using the Cronbach alpha coefficient (α), and convergent validity using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) to compare the MPASS to the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index as a referent test of mobility. Results: The MPASS consists of 8 items, and its scoring system provides information on the ability of people with stroke to reach a movement level enabling them to live in society, including interactions with other people and safe living in the community. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability were excellent (ICC, 0.948; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.893 to 0.982 and ICC, 0.967; 95% CI, 0.933 to 0.989, respectively). Internal consistency was good (α=0.877). The convergent validity was moderate (r=0.646; p<0.001). Conclusions: The newly developed MPASS showed acceptable construct validity and high reliability. The MPASS is suitable for use in people with stroke, especially those who have been discharged and live in the community with the ability to initiate sitting.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Hanchaiphiboolkul S, "Prevalence of stroke and stroke risk factors in Thailand : Thai Epidemiologic Stroke(TES)Study", J Med Assoc Thai, 94(4), pp.427~436 (2011)
  2. Teh WL, "Prevalence of stroke, risk factors, disability and care needs in older adults in Singapore : results from the WiSE study", BMJ Open, 8(3), pp.e020285~ (2018)
  3. Thorngren M, "Outcome after stroke in patients discharged to independent living", Stroke, 21(2), pp.236~240 (1990)
  4. McKenna K, "Predicting discharge outcomes for stroke patients in Australia", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 81(1), pp.47~56 (2002)
  5. Gilbertson L, "Domiciliary occupational therapy for patients with stroke discharged from hospital : randomised controlled trial", BMJ, 320(7235), pp.603~606 (2000)
  6. Brauer SG, "Prediction of discharge destination after stroke using the motor assessment scale on admission: a prospective, multisite study", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89(6), pp.1061~1065 (2008)
  7. Twible RL, "Preparing occupational therapists and physiotherapists for community based rehabilitation", Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J, pp.113~129 (2000)
  8. Bury T, "Primary health care and community based rehabilitation : implication for physical therapy", Asia Pac Disabil Rehabil J, 16(2), pp.29~61 (2005)
  9. Shumway-Cook A, "Environmental demands associated with community mobility in older adults with and without mobility disabilities", Phys Ther, 82(7), pp.670~681 (2002)
  10. van de Port IG, "Community ambulation in patients with chronic stroke: how is it related to gait speed?", J Rehabil Med, 40(1), pp.23~27 (2008)
  11. Patla AE, "Dimensions of mobility : defining the complexity and difficulty associated with community mobility", J Aging Phys Act, 7(1), pp.7~19 (1999)
  12. Corrigan R, "Community ambulation : environmental impacts and assessment inadequacies", Disabil Rehabil, 30(19), pp.1411~1419 (2008)
  13. Hsueh IP, "Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10 item Barthel index in patients with stroke", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 73(2), pp.188~190 (2002)
  14. Duncan PW, "Outcome measures in acute stroke trials : a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice", Stroke, 31(6), pp.1429~1438 (2000)
  15. Salter K, "Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation : ICF activity", Disabil Rehabil, 27(6), pp.315~340 (2005)
  16. Sabari JS, "Assessing arm and hand function after stroke : a validity test of the hierarchical scoring system used in the motor assessment scale for stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86(8), pp.1609~1615 (2005)
  17. Lennon S, "Key physiotherapy indicators for quality of stroke care", Physiotherapy, 82(12), pp.655~664 (1996)
  18. Lennon S, "The modified rivermead mobility index : validity and reliability", Disabil Rehabil, 22(18), pp.833~839 (2000)
  19. Johnson L, "Measurement of mobility following stroke : a comparison of the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index and the Motor Assessment Scale", Physiotherapy, 90(3), pp.132~138 (2004)
  20. Hsueh IP, "Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke", Stroke, 34(7), pp.1741~1745 (2003)
  21. Mokkink LB, "COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures", Qual Life Res, 27(5), pp.1171~1179 (2018)
  22. Portney LG, "Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice", pp.585~618 (2008), Pearson Prentice Hall
  23. Koo TK, "A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research", J Chiropr Med, 15(2), pp.155~163 (2016)
  24. Boateng GO, "Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer", Front Public Health, 6, pp.149~ (2018)
  25. Hyndman D, "Stops walking when talking as a predictor of falls in people with stroke living in the community", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 75(7), pp.994~997 (2004)
  26. Hajek VE, "Cognitive and functional assessments of stroke patients : an analysis of their relation", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78(12), pp.1331~1337 (1997)
  27. Lord SE, "Measurement of community ambulation after stroke : current status and future developments", Stroke, 36(7), pp.1457~1461 (2005)
  28. Viosca E, "Walking recovery after an acute stroke : assessment with a new functional classification and the Barthel Index", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86(6), pp.1239~1244 (2005)
  29. Jung H, "Relationship between mobility-related activities of daily living and health-related quality of life among healthy older adults : a cross-sectional study using structural equation modeling", Gerontol Geriatr Med, 7, pp.23337214211013166~ (2021)
  30. Kwon S, "Health-related quality of life and related factors in stroke survivors : data from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey(KNHANES)2008 to 2014", PLoS One, 13(4), pp.e0195713~ (2018)
  31. Lynch EB, "A qualitative study of quality of life after stroke : the importance of social relationships", J Rehabil Med, 40(7), pp.518~523 (2008)
  32. Asher L, "Most older pedestrians are unable to cross the road in time : a cross-sectional study", Age Ageing, 41(5), pp.690~694 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)