The Korean Version of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Reliability and Validity Evaluation
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To systematically translate the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) into a Korean version of the FMA (K-FMA). Methods We translated the original FMA into the Korean version with three translators and a translation committee, which included physiatrists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists. Based on a test-retest method, each of 31 patients with stroke was assessed by two evaluators twice, once on recruitment, and again after a week. Analysis of intra- and inter-rater reliabilities was performed using the intra-class correlation coefficient, whereas validity was analysed using Pearson correlation test along with the Motricity Index (MI), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Results The intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were significant for the total score, and good to excellent reliability was noted in all domains except for the joint range of motion of the lower extremity domain of the K-FMA. The MI and MAS scores were significantly correlated with all domains, all with p<0.01. The results for the MI ranged from r=0.639 to r=0.891 and those for the MAS from r=0.339 to r=0.555. However, the BBS was not significantly correlated with any domain, as the K-FMA lacks balance evaluation items. Conclusion The K-FMA was found to have high reliability and validity. Additionally, the newly developed manual for the K-FMA may help minimise errors that can occur during evaluation and improve the reliability of motor function evaluation.
Abstract
Objective To systematically translate the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) into a Korean version of the FMA (K-FMA). Methods We translated the original FMA into the Korean version with three translators and a translation committee, which included physiatrists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists. Based on a test-retest method, each of 31 patients with stroke was assessed by two evaluators twice, once on recruitment, and again after a week. Analysis of intra- and inter-rater reliabilities was performed using the intra-class correlation coefficient, whereas validity was analysed using Pearson correlation test along with the Motricity Index (MI), Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Results The intra- and inter-rater reliabilities were significant for the total score, and good to excellent reliability was noted in all domains except for the joint range of motion of the lower extremity domain of the K-FMA. The MI and MAS scores were significantly correlated with all domains, all with p<0.01. The results for the MI ranged from r=0.639 to r=0.891 and those for the MAS from r=0.339 to r=0.555. However, the BBS was not significantly correlated with any domain, as the K-FMA lacks balance evaluation items. Conclusion The K-FMA was found to have high reliability and validity. Additionally, the newly developed manual for the K-FMA may help minimise errors that can occur during evaluation and improve the reliability of motor function evaluation.
참고문헌 (30)
- Langhorne P, "Motor recovery after stroke : a systematic review", Lancet Neurol, 8, pp.741~754 (2009)
- Shavelle RM, "Life expectancy after stroke based on age, sex, and Rankin grade of disability: a synthesis", J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 28, pp.104450~ (2019)
- Jehkonen M, "Predictors of discharge to home during the first year after right hemisphere stroke", Acta Neurol Scand, 104, pp.136~141 (2001)
- Barbosa NE, "Translation and cultural validation of clinical observational scales : the Fugl-Meyer assessment for post stroke sensorimotor function in Colombian Spanish", Disabil Rehabil, 41, pp.2317~2323 (2019)
- Fugl-Meyer AR, "The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance", Scand J Rehabil Med, 7, pp.13~31 (1975)
- Gladstone DJ, "The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke : a critical review of its measurement properties", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 16, pp.232~240 (2002)
- Michaelsen SM, "Translation, adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the administration manual for the Fugl-Meyer assessment", Rev Bras Fisioter, 15, pp.80~88 (2011)
- Duncan PW, "Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident", Phys Ther, 63, pp.1606~1610 (1983)
- Sanford J, "Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke", Phys Ther, 73, pp.447~454 (1993)
- Sullivan KJ, "Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor function after stroke : standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials", Stroke, 42, pp.427~432 (2011)
- See J, "A standardized approach to the Fugl-Meyer assessment and its implications for clinical trials", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 27, pp.732~741 (2013)
- Malouin F, "Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke : comparison of the Fugl-Meyer assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75, pp.1206~1212 (1994)
- Nadeau S, "Analysis of the clinical factors determining natural and maximal gait speeds in adults with a stroke", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 78, pp.123~130 (1999)
- Shelton FD, "Motor impairment as a predictor of functional recovery and guide to rehabilitation treatment after stroke", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 15, pp.229~237 (2001)
- Mao HF, "Analysis and comparison of the psychometric properties of three balance measures for stroke patients", Stroke, 33, pp.1022~1027 (2002)
- Hsieh YW, "Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation", Stroke, 40, pp.1386~1391 (2009)
- Dettmann MA, "Relationships among walking performance, postural stability, and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient", Am J Phys Med, 66, pp.77~90 (1987)
- Deakin A, "Rough guide to the Fugl-Meyer Assessment : upper limb section", Physiotherapy, 89, pp.751~763 (2003)
- Amano S, "Reliability and validity of arm function assessment for the Fugl–Meyer assessment with a Japanese guideline", Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 61, pp.e186~ (2018)
- Lundquist CB, "The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version", Disabil Rehabil, 39, pp.934~939 (2017)
- Mina Park, "Korean Version of the Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale: Reliability and Validity Evaluation", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(1), pp.11~19 (2020), 대한재활의학회[DOI]
- Fayazi M, "Test-retest reliability of Motricity Index strength assessments for lower extremity in post stroke hemiparesis", Med J Islam Repub Iran, 26, pp.27~30 (2012)
- Blum L, "Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation : a systematic review", Phys Ther, 88, pp.559~566 (2008)
- Stevenson TJ, "Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale", Aust J Physiother, 47, pp.29~38 (2001)
- Cicchetti DV, "Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology", Psychol Assess, 6, pp.284~290 (1994)
- Hinkle DE, "Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences" (2003), Houghton Mifflin
- Hsueh IP, "Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke", Stroke, 34, pp.1741~1745 (2003)
- de Oliveira R, "Post-stroke motor and functional evaluations: a clinical correlation using Fugl-Meyer assessment scale, Berg balance scale and Barthel index", Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 64, pp.731~735 (2006)
- Kim H, "Reliability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for hemiplegic patients", J Phys Ther Sci, 24, pp.893~899 (2012)
- 배원식, "뇌졸중 환자에서 기능평가와 보행 및 균형과의 관련성", 대한물리의학회지, 6(1), pp.59~69 (2011), 대한물리의학회