Korean Version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia in Ataxic Stroke Patients
3
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and usefulness of the Korean version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (K-SARA) in ataxic stroke patients.Methods The original SARA was translated into Korean, back translated to English, and compared to the original version. Stroke patients (n=60) with ataxia were evaluated using the K-SARA by one physiatrist and one occupational therapist. All subjects were rated twice. We divided the subjects into 5 groups by Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) and 3 groups based on the ataxia subscale of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The mean K-SARA scores representing each group of FAC and the ataxia subscale of NIHSS were compared.Results The test-retest correlation coefficient of the K-SARA was 0.997 by the therapist and 1.00 by the physiatrist (p<0.001). The inter-rater correlation coefficient of the K-SARA was 0.985 (p<0.001). The ataxia subscale of NIHSS did not correlate with K-SARA. There was a significant difference in the mean K-SARA score by FAC (p<0.001). Conclusion K-SARA is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia in stroke patients in Korea.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and usefulness of the Korean version of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (K-SARA) in ataxic stroke patients.Methods The original SARA was translated into Korean, back translated to English, and compared to the original version. Stroke patients (n=60) with ataxia were evaluated using the K-SARA by one physiatrist and one occupational therapist. All subjects were rated twice. We divided the subjects into 5 groups by Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) and 3 groups based on the ataxia subscale of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The mean K-SARA scores representing each group of FAC and the ataxia subscale of NIHSS were compared.Results The test-retest correlation coefficient of the K-SARA was 0.997 by the therapist and 1.00 by the physiatrist (p<0.001). The inter-rater correlation coefficient of the K-SARA was 0.985 (p<0.001). The ataxia subscale of NIHSS did not correlate with K-SARA. There was a significant difference in the mean K-SARA score by FAC (p<0.001). Conclusion K-SARA is a reliable and valid measure of ataxia in stroke patients in Korea.
참고문헌 (12)
- 황성희, "뇌졸중과 운동실조", 대한뇌졸중학회지, 1(2), pp.139~145 (1999), 대한뇌졸중학회
- Mariotti C, "An overview of the patient with ataxia", J Neurol, 252, pp.511~518 (2005)
- Trouillas P, "International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome. The Ataxia Neuropharmacology Committee of the World Federation of Neurology", J Neurol Sci, 145, pp.205~211 (1997)
- Subramony SH, "Measuring Friedreich ataxia: interrater reliability of a neurologic rating scale", Neurology, 64, pp.1261~1262 (2005)
- Schmitz-Hubsch T, "Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale", Neurology, 66, pp.1717~1720 (2006)
- Wenning GK, "Development and validation of the Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS)", Mov Disord, 19, pp.1391~1402 (2004)
- Schmahmann JD, "Development of a brief ataxia rating scale (BARS)based on a modified form of the ICARS", Mov Disord, 24, pp.1820~1828 (2009)
- Weyer A, "Reliability and validity of the scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: a study in 64 ataxia patients", Mov Disord, 22, pp.1633~1637 (2007)
- Braga-Neto P, "Translation and validation into Brazilian version of the Scale of the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)", Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 68, pp.228~230 (2010)
- Bo-Ram Kim, "Usefulness of the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in Ataxic Stroke Patients", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(6), pp.772~780 (2011), 대한재활의학회
- Brott T, "Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale", Stroke, 20, pp.864~870 (1989)
- Kasner SE, "Reliability and validity of estimating the NIH stroke scale score from medical records", Stroke, 30, pp.1534~1537 (1999)