본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Validity and Reliability of the Thai Version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire in Individuals With Parkinson’s disease

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q) in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods The FOG-Q was translated into Thai according to the standard process. Fifty-six individuals with PD participated in the study. The content validity was assessed using the content validity index (CVI). The construct validity was evaluated by correlating Thai FOG-Q with Thai version of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) items 2.13 and 3.11, Thai version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rS). The correlation between Thai FOG-Q and clinical characteristics, for example, duration of PD and modified Hoehn and Yahr (mH&Y) stage was evaluated. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated with Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Results The Thai FOG-Q had high content validity (CVI=0.96). The mean FOG-Q score was 9.0±4.9. The construct validity showed a strong positive correlation with MDS-UPDRS item 2.13 (rS=0.81), and moderate correlations with MDS-UPDRS item 3.11, FES-I, and TUG (rS=0.42–0.60). A negative correlation with BBS was found (rS=-0.32). It had a moderate correlation with mH&Y stage (rS=0.40). The Thai FOG-Q had good internal consistency (Cα=0.87) with excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.91). Conclusion The Thai FOG-Q has excellent validity and reliability. It is a useful instrument for the evaluation of FOG in individuals with PD.

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Thai version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FOG-Q) in individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Methods The FOG-Q was translated into Thai according to the standard process. Fifty-six individuals with PD participated in the study. The content validity was assessed using the content validity index (CVI). The construct validity was evaluated by correlating Thai FOG-Q with Thai version of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) items 2.13 and 3.11, Thai version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), Timed Up and Go test (TUG) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) using Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rS). The correlation between Thai FOG-Q and clinical characteristics, for example, duration of PD and modified Hoehn and Yahr (mH&Y) stage was evaluated. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated with Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Results The Thai FOG-Q had high content validity (CVI=0.96). The mean FOG-Q score was 9.0±4.9. The construct validity showed a strong positive correlation with MDS-UPDRS item 2.13 (rS=0.81), and moderate correlations with MDS-UPDRS item 3.11, FES-I, and TUG (rS=0.42–0.60). A negative correlation with BBS was found (rS=-0.32). It had a moderate correlation with mH&Y stage (rS=0.40). The Thai FOG-Q had good internal consistency (Cα=0.87) with excellent test-retest reliability (ICC=0.91). Conclusion The Thai FOG-Q has excellent validity and reliability. It is a useful instrument for the evaluation of FOG in individuals with PD.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Nutt JG, "Freezing of gait : moving forward on a mysterious clinical phenomenon", Lancet Neurol, 10, pp.734~744 (2011)
  2. Tan DM, "Freezing of gait and activity limitations in people with Parkinson’s disease", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 92, pp.1159~1165 (2011)
  3. Forsaa EB, "A 12-year population-based study of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease", Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 21, pp.254~258 (2015)
  4. Giladi N, "Freezing of gait in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease", J Neural Transm(Vienna), 108, pp.53~61 (2001)
  5. Giladi N, "Motor blocks in Parkinson’s disease", Neurology, 42, pp.333~339 (1992)
  6. Bloem BR, "Falls and freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease : a review of two interconnected, episodic phenomena", Mov Disord, 19, pp.871~884 (2004)
  7. Lamberti P, "Freezing gait in Parkinson’s disease", Eur Neurol, 38, pp.297~301 (1997)
  8. Georgy E, "Freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease : impact on falls risk, walking aids utilization, and assistance-seeking behavior", Eur J Adapt Phys Act, 3, pp.49~59 (2010)
  9. Giladi N, "Freezing of gait in PD : prospective assessment in the DATATOP cohort", Neurology, 56, pp.1712~1721 (2001)
  10. Moore O, "Freezing of gait affects quality of life of peoples with Parkinson’s disease beyond its relationships with mobility and gait", Mov Disord, 22, pp.2192~2195 (2007)
  11. Santos García D, "Non-motor symptoms burden, mood, and gait problems are the most significant factors contributing to a poor quality of life in non-demented Parkinson’s disease patients : results from the COPPADIS Study Cohort", Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 66, pp.151~157 (2019)
  12. Giladi N, "Construction of freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinsonism", Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 6, pp.165~170 (2000)
  13. Bloem BR, "Measurement instruments to assess posture, gait, and balance in Parkinson’s disease : critique and recommendations", Mov Disord, 31, pp.1342~1355 (2016)
  14. Giladi N, "Validation of the freezing of gait questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease", Mov Disord, 24, pp.655~661 (2009)
  15. Nilsson MH, "Freezing of Gait Questionnaire : validity and reliability of the Swedish version", Acta Neurol Scand, 120, pp.331~334 (2009)
  16. Baggio JA, "Validity of the Brazilian version of the freezing of gait questionnaire", Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 70, pp.599~603 (2012)
  17. Vogler A, "German translation and validation of the"freezing of gait questionnaire"in patients with Parkinson’s disease", Parkinsons Dis, 2015, pp.982058~ (2015)
  18. Tambasco N, "The validation of an Italian version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire", Neurol Sci, 36, pp.759~764 (2015)
  19. Candan SA, "Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease", Neurol Sci Neurophysiol, 36, pp.44~50 (2019)
  20. Goetz CG, "Movement Disorder Societysponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale(MDS-UPDRS) : scale presentation and clinimetric testing results", Mov Disord, 23, pp.2129~2170 (2008)
  21. Yardley L, "Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International(FES-I)", Age Ageing, 34, pp.614~619 (2005)
  22. Jonasson SB, "Psychometric properties of four fear of falling rating scales in people with Parkinson’s disease", BMC Geriatr, 14, pp.66~ (2014)
  23. Winser SJ, "Measures of balance and falls risk prediction in people with Parkinson’s disease : a systematic review of psychometric properties", Clin Rehabil, 33, pp.1949~1962 (2019)
  24. Thiamwong L, "Psychometric testing of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International(FES-I)in Thai older adults", Songkla Med J, 29, pp.277~287 (2011)
  25. Morris S, "Reliability of measurements obtained with the Timed"Up & Go"test in people with Parkinson disease", Phys Ther, 81, pp.810~818 (2001)
  26. Krzysztoń K, "Evaluation of balance disorders in Parkinson’s disease using simple diagnostic tests-not so simple to choose", Front Neurol, 9, pp.932~ (2018)
  27. Brusse KJ, "Testing functional performance in people with Parkinson disease", Phys Ther, 85, pp.134~141 (2005)
  28. Qutubuddin AA, "Validating the Berg Balance Scale for patients with Parkinson’s disease : a key to rehabilitation evaluation", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86, pp.789~792 (2005)
  29. Beaton DE, "Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 25, pp.3186~3191 (2000)
  30. Schober P, "Correlation coefficients : appropriate use and interpretation", Anesth Analg, 126, pp.1763~1768 (2018)
  31. Taber KS, "The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education", Res Sci Educ, 48, pp.1273~1296 (2018)
  32. Koo TK, "A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research", J Chiropr Med, 16, pp.346~ (2017)
  33. Elbers RG, "Is gait speed a valid measure to predict community ambulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease?", J Rehabil Med, 45, pp.370~375 (2013)
  34. Adkin AL, "Fear of falling and postural control in Parkinson’s disease", Mov Disord, 18, pp.496~502 (2003)
  35. Park JH, "What is wrong with balance in Parkinson’s disease?", J Mov Disord, 8, pp.109~114 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of the Dynamic Gait Index in Persons With Parkinson’s Disease우영근, 황수진한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2010 · 제17권 제4호Reliability and Validity of the Korean Short-form Eight-item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)김세현, 김현숙, 박민정, 박혜자한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2020 · 제45권 제2호Translation and Validation of the Korean Version of the 39-Item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire고성범, 권도영, 김재우, 김중석, 마효일, 백종삼, 안태범, 이필휴, 정선주, 조진환대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2013 · 제9권 제1호Validation Study of the Official Korean Version of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale강석윤, 강석재, 고성범, 권겸일, 김상진, 김재우, 김중석, 김한준, 김희태, 박건우, 박미영, 박성호, 박진세, 백종삼, 손영호, 안진영, 오응석, 윤진영, 이지영, 이필휴, 장우영, 전범석, 정선주, 조진환, 천상명, 허영은대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2020 · 제16권 제4호Number of Steps and Time to Accomplish Turning During Timed Up and Go Test in Community-Dwelling Elderlies With and Without Idiopathic Parkinson Disease임우택, choi bongsam한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2016 · 제23권 제4호Validity and Reliability of the Korean Versions of the 9- and 19-Item Wearing-Off Questionnaires in Parkinson’s Disease박진세, 오응석, Hee-Tae Kim, Jinyoung Youn, Soohyun Lim, Suyeon Park, Wooyoung Jang, Yoonsang Oh대한신경과학회 · Journal of Clinical Neurology2024 · 제20권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)