실체를 상실한 문화상상으로서의 동북아시아 - 한중일 드라마 「꽃보다 남자」 연구
Northeast-asia as an cultural imagination without its own true nature
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis reveal that the reappearance of east-asia as the leader of globalization is not symbolized through Men over flowers as the complete independence from the Occident but rather border of Occident without its own character. Even this fact though, serious reveal of Men over Flowers in Korea, China, and Japan and got huge fan is based on the fact the life of Northeast-asia is founded on the occidental life style. When the life is based on the occidental spirit, the thought of east-asia can be whether postponed or discarded. This phenomenan is revealed directly in the show. In the show, luxurious goods reveal the sensation of longing and imitation through all the classes so it can be revealed the solidarity of Northeast-asian. It, however, it fronts this appropriateness of solidarity, it gives dilemmas to give east-asia to terran of Occident. This simple idea brought about the result that the love for family is seized by the occidental capital. All the conflict is collected by the family value of asia, but in fact, familism is the hostage of capitalism by the Occident. The temptation of capital vested Northeast-asia into the occidental terran using the familiarity of family. The loss of memory of this show is given shape by skepticism about the presence of oriental Northeast-asian spirit. The memory loss of the character shows the fear of second-in-command of east-asia that without assimilation with the Occident, he cannot exist. Forever occidental others. Likewise, the show reveals clearly that Northeast-asia is not the geographical true nature. The ultimate conclusion of Men over Flowers is the negative perspect that east-asia is a cultural imagination, a floating ballot made from identification such as orientalism or narcissism. This cultural imagination controls the space of imagination of east-asian public, and after all the imagination of joining the world powers is just mere judge of imperialism. After all, the limit of east-asia through Men over Flowers is quite clear. It avoid deliberately the fact that the universality does not match with the real life and is contrary to people's expectation and finally betray. As long as it is believed that east-asia's comeback only can be realized through surrendering to Occident as the universality, east-asia cannot help but be alienated itself. The idea to recover the Occident from the solidarity of asian resisting european can only make it sure to accept european. The mind of substitute cannot be premised without the others. The important thing is to recognize the Occident as a true nature of terran. If not, like in the Men over Flowers, the true nature of east-asia can be far to be realized.
Abstract
This thesis reveal that the reappearance of east-asia as the leader of globalization is not symbolized through Men over flowers as the complete independence from the Occident but rather border of Occident without its own character. Even this fact though, serious reveal of Men over Flowers in Korea, China, and Japan and got huge fan is based on the fact the life of Northeast-asia is founded on the occidental life style. When the life is based on the occidental spirit, the thought of east-asia can be whether postponed or discarded. This phenomenan is revealed directly in the show. In the show, luxurious goods reveal the sensation of longing and imitation through all the classes so it can be revealed the solidarity of Northeast-asian. It, however, it fronts this appropriateness of solidarity, it gives dilemmas to give east-asia to terran of Occident. This simple idea brought about the result that the love for family is seized by the occidental capital. All the conflict is collected by the family value of asia, but in fact, familism is the hostage of capitalism by the Occident. The temptation of capital vested Northeast-asia into the occidental terran using the familiarity of family. The loss of memory of this show is given shape by skepticism about the presence of oriental Northeast-asian spirit. The memory loss of the character shows the fear of second-in-command of east-asia that without assimilation with the Occident, he cannot exist. Forever occidental others. Likewise, the show reveals clearly that Northeast-asia is not the geographical true nature. The ultimate conclusion of Men over Flowers is the negative perspect that east-asia is a cultural imagination, a floating ballot made from identification such as orientalism or narcissism. This cultural imagination controls the space of imagination of east-asian public, and after all the imagination of joining the world powers is just mere judge of imperialism. After all, the limit of east-asia through Men over Flowers is quite clear. It avoid deliberately the fact that the universality does not match with the real life and is contrary to people's expectation and finally betray. As long as it is believed that east-asia's comeback only can be realized through surrendering to Occident as the universality, east-asia cannot help but be alienated itself. The idea to recover the Occident from the solidarity of asian resisting european can only make it sure to accept european. The mind of substitute cannot be premised without the others. The important thing is to recognize the Occident as a true nature of terran. If not, like in the Men over Flowers, the true nature of east-asia can be far to be realized.
참고문헌 (29)
- 유순차이, "대만판 유성화원-꽃보다 남자 프리지엠", ~ (2001)
- "일본판 꽃보다 남자"[URL]
- "한국판 꽃보다 남자"[URL]
- 김무경, "자연회귀의 사회학", pp.43~534 (2007), 살림
- 동아시아공동체연구회, "동아시아공동체와 한국의 미래", pp.172~194 (2008), 이매진
- 박정자, "로빈슨 크루소의 사치", pp.38~ (2006), 기파랑
- 백영서, "동아시아의 지역질서-제국을 넘어 공동체로", pp.28~406 (2005), 창비
- 원용찬, "유한계급론", pp.84~149 (2007), 살림
- 이동연, "아시아 문화연구를 상상하기", pp.27~349 (2006), 그린비
- 이득재, "가족주의는 야만이다", pp.31~230 (2001), 소나무
- 이수훈, "위기와 동아시아 자본주의", pp.203~214 (2001), 아르케
- 함재봉, "탈근대와 유교", pp.270~276 (1998), 나남출판
- 홍석준, "동아시아의 문화와 문화적 정체성", pp.13~217 (2009), 한울아카데미
- 미셸 마페졸리, "현대를 생각한다", pp.70~180 (1997), 문예출판사
- 비비아나 A. 젤라이저, "친밀성의 거래", pp.16~61 (2009), 에코리브르
- 울리히 벡, "사랑은 지독한, 그러나 너무나 정상적인 혼란", pp.10~63 (1999), 새물결
- 팀 에덴서, "대중문화와 일상, 그리고 민족정체성", pp.78~176 (2008), 이후
- 한나 아렌트, "폭력의 세기", pp.17~68 (1999), 이후
- 김대환, "동아시아 경제 개혁의 비교 연구 서설 In: 발견으로서의 동아시아", pp.344~351 (2000), 문학과지성사
- 동북아시아의 도시 및 지역발전의 추세, "김원배", 서울시정개발연구원, 2~, pp.SDI Monograph Series 93-M-7 (1993)
- 김은실, "‘동아시아 담론’의 문화 정체성에 대한 문제제기 In: 발견으로서의 동아시아", pp.259~260 (2000), 문학과지성사
- 김태만, "아시아적 가치와 동아시아 발전의 원동력", 동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회, pp.82~97 (2000)
- 박상수, "중국경제의 글로벌화와 산업 리스트럭춰링에 대한 전망", 중국학연구, 24, pp.409~436 (2003), 중국학연구회
- 배윤기, "의식의 공간으로서 로컬과 로컬리티의 정치", 로컬리티의 인문학, 3, pp.109~133 (2010)
- 백영서, "중국에 ‘아시아’가 있는가? In: 발견으로서의 동아시아", pp.68~ (2000), 문학과지성사
- 조은, "‘동아시아 가족’이 있는가 In: 발견으로서의 동아시아", pp.175~176 (2000), 문학과지성사
- 채재병, "동아시아의 주권인식과 지역협력: 문화적 정체성의 모색", 한국정치외교사논총, 27(2), pp.403~428 (2006), 한국정치외교사학회
- 딩시만, "동북아시아의 새로운 역할과 한중일의 협력 방안, 21세기 동북아시아의 새로운 협력과 발전", 부산일보 창간 50돌 기념 한중일 국제심포지엄, pp.28~ (1996)
