所有関係を表す「再帰構文」の一考察 - ガ格名詞の意図と動作を中心に -
The Consideration of 「Jaeguigumun(The Sentence of Reflexive)」 Which Shows The Relation of Possession - Focus on Relation between Intention and Action of Ga-case Noun -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The verb of Japanese language is classified into two groups: the transitive verb and intransitive verb, it is generally classified by the form whether it has the positional case of 「o」or not. But among the verbs taking the positional case of 「o」, there is a sentence of reflexive that the reflexivity is bringing about the conditional changes in which the action of an activist does not influence the object but influence the activist himself. The research about these examples of the sentence of reflexive has been pointed on the verb which is similar to the intransitive verb whether it has the direct passive sentence or not. But as a result of the analysis of the reflexive sentence, we have known that the positional case of noun taking 「o」 and 「ga」 has been composed of a possessive relation each other. Such a possessive relation is classified into 4 and again it is classified as a sentence of reflexive. And whether the relation is the intentional and active form or not, it has established the most formal sentence of reflexive and then it begins to analyze how the sentence of reflexive approaches to the intransitive verb through some kinds of process. These analyses must be analyzed by the aspect of the clause, the form, and meaning, and through these analyses we will clearly expect how the sentence of reflexive approaches to the intransitive verb in some forms.
Abstract
The verb of Japanese language is classified into two groups: the transitive verb and intransitive verb, it is generally classified by the form whether it has the positional case of 「o」or not. But among the verbs taking the positional case of 「o」, there is a sentence of reflexive that the reflexivity is bringing about the conditional changes in which the action of an activist does not influence the object but influence the activist himself. The research about these examples of the sentence of reflexive has been pointed on the verb which is similar to the intransitive verb whether it has the direct passive sentence or not. But as a result of the analysis of the reflexive sentence, we have known that the positional case of noun taking 「o」 and 「ga」 has been composed of a possessive relation each other. Such a possessive relation is classified into 4 and again it is classified as a sentence of reflexive. And whether the relation is the intentional and active form or not, it has established the most formal sentence of reflexive and then it begins to analyze how the sentence of reflexive approaches to the intransitive verb through some kinds of process. These analyses must be analyzed by the aspect of the clause, the form, and meaning, and through these analyses we will clearly expect how the sentence of reflexive approaches to the intransitive verb in some forms.
참고문헌 (10)
- 天野みどり, "日本語における<再帰性>について―構文論的概念としての有効性の再検討―", 日本語と日本文学, 7, pp.4~6 (1987), 筑波大学国語国文学会
- 須賀一好, "自他違い─自動詞と目的語、そして自他の分類─ In 馬淵和夫博士退官記念 国語学論集", pp.126~127 (1977), 大修舘書店
- 孫 東周, "日本語動詞とヴォイス", pp.19~95 (2005), 재이앤씨
- 高橋太郎, "文中にあらわれる所属関係の種々相", 国文学, 103, pp.4~5 (1975)
- 仁田義雄, "再帰動詞、再帰用法 ―Lexico-Syntaxの姿勢から―", 日本語教育, 47, pp.84~90 (1982), 日本語教育学会
- 益岡新次郎, "基礎日本語文法", pp.122~124 (1989), くろしお出版
- 三上章, "現代語法序説―シンタクスの試み―", pp.110~ (1953), 刀江書院
- 村木新次郎, "ヴォイス In 講座日本語と日本語教育 第4券(上)", pp.181~182 (1989), 明治書院
- "朝日新聞", 朝日新聞社, ~ (1999)
- 村上春樹, "アフターダーク", 講談社, ~ (2004)
