한국과 일본 대학생의 국민정체성과 다문화태도
A Comparative Study of National Identity and Attitudes towards Immigrants among Korean and Japanese University Students
1
조회
0
다운로드
21
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper explores the national identity and the attitudes towards immigrants among Korean and Japanese university students(below, KUS, JUS). In order to this research, we used cross-national comparable data from Korea and Japan researched at the institute for social Science Research in PNU. and analyzed by factor analysis, t-test. The results are as follows. First, the national identity was examined by national attachment, national pride, qualification of nation. In the national attachment and the national pride, JUS was generally higher than KUS. And the qualification of nation of KUS divided by two factors, that is, civic and ethnic factor, whereas that of JUS had not divide. But there seemed that KUS had strong civic identity and JUS had strong ethnic identity. Second, the attitudes towards immigrants was examined by social distance, attitudes about multicultural society, perceived threat. In the social distance, KUS were generally similar JUS, but JUS were more acceptable than KUS for international marriage. In the attitudes about multicultural society, KUS were very similar JUS, but KUS recognized positively and JUS recognized negatively. In the perceived threat, KUS concerned than JUS about taking jobs away from immigrants, damage of lineage and culture, and JUS concerned than KUS about increase of social problems related immigrants. In the attitudes of multicultural policy, KUS were more higher than JUS to support foreign school, wheres JUS were higher than KUS to qualify foreigners as voter.
Abstract
This paper explores the national identity and the attitudes towards immigrants among Korean and Japanese university students(below, KUS, JUS). In order to this research, we used cross-national comparable data from Korea and Japan researched at the institute for social Science Research in PNU. and analyzed by factor analysis, t-test. The results are as follows. First, the national identity was examined by national attachment, national pride, qualification of nation. In the national attachment and the national pride, JUS was generally higher than KUS. And the qualification of nation of KUS divided by two factors, that is, civic and ethnic factor, whereas that of JUS had not divide. But there seemed that KUS had strong civic identity and JUS had strong ethnic identity. Second, the attitudes towards immigrants was examined by social distance, attitudes about multicultural society, perceived threat. In the social distance, KUS were generally similar JUS, but JUS were more acceptable than KUS for international marriage. In the attitudes about multicultural society, KUS were very similar JUS, but KUS recognized positively and JUS recognized negatively. In the perceived threat, KUS concerned than JUS about taking jobs away from immigrants, damage of lineage and culture, and JUS concerned than KUS about increase of social problems related immigrants. In the attitudes of multicultural policy, KUS were more higher than JUS to support foreign school, wheres JUS were higher than KUS to qualify foreigners as voter.
참고문헌 (27)
- 권혁범, "민족주의는 죄악인가", pp.11~72 (2009), 생각의 나무
- 김남일, "열린사회 구현을 위한 외국인정책 방향", 한국적 다문화주의의 이론화, 2007 전기사회학대회, pp.1~19 (2007)
- 김현선, "국민, 半국민, 非국민: 한국 국민형성의 원리와 과정", 사회연구, 7(2), pp.79~108 (2006), 한국사회조사연구소
- 외국인정책 관련 미래예측 보고서, "법무부", ~ (2006)
- 법무부, "통계연보", ~ (2011)
- 신용하, "민족이론" (1985), 문학과 지성사
- 윤인진, "한국 민족주의 담론의 전개와 대안적 민족주의의 모색", 한국사회, 8, pp.5~29 (2007)
- 임지현, "민족담론의 스팩트럼", 안과 밖, (8,), pp.65~87 (2004)
- 이종훈, "재외동포개정론과 폐지론의 합리성 검토, In 재외동포법" (2002), 사람생각
- 정기선, "한국인의 국가정체성 국제비교 : 자격요건 평가를 중심으로", 한국인의 가치지향: 국제비교 제1차 KGSS 심포지엄, pp.81~94 (2004)
- 정기선, "한국인의 국민정체성 국제비교연구: 자격요건 평가를 중심으로", Comparative Korean Studies, 19(1), pp.45~72 (2011), 국제비교한국학회
- 정인섭, "1991-92년도 國籍法 개정작업", 서울국제법연구, 14(2), pp.85~117 (2007), 서울국제법연구원
- 최현, "한국인의 다문화 시티즌십(multicultural citizenship) : 다문화 의식을 중심으로", 시민사회와 NGO, 5(2), pp.147~173 (2007), 제3섹터연구소
- 渡戶一郞, "多民族化社會 日本" (2010), 明石書店
- Bilal, S., "Attitudes towards Immigration:A Trade-Theoretic Approach", Review of International Economics, 11(2), pp.253~267 (2006)
- Brubaker,R.W, "Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany" (1992), Harvard Univ. Press
- Attitude Toward Minorities: Key Finding from the Eurobarometer and the European Social Survey, "EUMC", ~ (2005)
- Esses, V. M., "The Immigration Dilemma:The Role of Perceived Group Competition,Ethnic Prejudice,and National Identity", Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), pp.389~412 (2001)
- Jones, F. L., "Individual and Societal Bases of National Identity:A Comparative Multi Level Analysis", European Sociological Review, 1(1), pp.103~118 (2001)
- Ho, R, "Multiculturalism in Australia:A survey of attitudes", Human Relations, 43, pp.259~272 (1990)
- Kymlica, W, "Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights" (1996), Clarendon Press
- Simon, R. J, "A Comparative Assessment of Public Opinion toward Immigrants and Immigration Policies", International Migration Review, 33(2), pp.455~467 (1999)
- Smith, A, "The nation in history: historiographical debates about ethnicity and nationalism" (2000), Hanover Univ. Press of New England
- Taifel, H., "An integrative theory of intergroup conflict, In The social psychology of intergroup relations", pp.1979, Brooks
- Troper, H., "Ethnicity,politics,and public policy:case studies in Canadian diversity" (1998), University of Toronto Press
- World Population Prospects : The 2008 Revision, "UNDESA", ~, pp.Highlights, Working Paper No. ESA (2009), P[DOI]
- Wiggins, J. A., "Social Psychology,5th(ed.)" (1994), McGraw- Hill