독거노인 돌봄에 있어 인간중심의 IT 활용방안에 관한 연구
A Study on Human-Centered IT Utilization in Caring for Elderly People Who Live Alone
1
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 COVID-19로 기술을 활용한 비대면 지역사회 돌봄서비스의 수요가 증가함에 따라 독거노인 돌봄에 있어 인간 중심의 IT 활용방안을 모색하기 위해 진행되었다. 전문가 대상 FGI를 통해 ICT 활용 돌봄서비스 현황, 전달체계의 문제, 윤리적 이슈를 확인하였다. IT를 활용한 서비스로 독거노인의 생활안전과 고독사 예방을 위한 보조기술인 ‘돌봄플러그’와 정서적 지지의 반려로봇이 활용되고 있었다. 전달체계 상의 문제로는 일상생활 지원을 위한 보조기술 활용에 대한 신뢰 부족, 공급자중심, 일률적 제공이라는 문제가 도출되었으며 대면서비스의 보조적 수단으로 활용되어야 하고 통제 가능하며 편이성이 담보되어야 할 필요성이 제시되었다. 인간중심의 IT 활용을 위한 윤리적 이슈로 ‘자기결정권의 보장’, ‘사생활보호’, ‘충분한 알권리의 보장’, 그리고 ‘사각지대 포괄’의 이슈가 제시되었다. 연구 결과를 토대로 이용자 중심의 설계 필요성과 인간중심의 보조기술 활용을 위안 윤리지표의 필요성을 제시하였다.
Abstract
This study was conducted to find ways to utilize human-centered IT in caring for elderly people who live alone. Through focus group interviews with experts, this study investigated the problems with delivery system, and ethical issues. Problems such as lack of trust, supplier-centered care, and uniform service provision were derived as major problems in the delivery system. These findings indicate that IT should be used as an auxiliary means of face-to-face services and to be controllable and convenient. Issues such as “guaranteeing the right to self-determination,” “protecting privacy,” “sufficiently guaranteeing the right to know,” and “encompassing blind spots” were raised as important ethical issues related to human-centered IT utilization. Based on the research results, this study presented the necessity of designing user-centered information technology and the necessity of developing ethical indicators for the use of human-centered technology.
참고문헌 (31)
- "2020 Statistics for Elderly" (2020)[URL]
- Prospects of regional demographics and Policy Implications, "S. L. Lee", Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, ~ (2018)
- 전해숙, "노년기 우울궤적의 예측요인: 한국복지패널을 이용하여", 한국노년학, 29(4), pp.1611~1628 (2009), 한국노년학회
- "Welfare service advancement plan using advanced technology auxiliary equipment" (2021)[URL]
- Y. H. Bae, "Activation task of community based technology for elderly adult and disabled person in the new normal : Based on smart home living-lab cases", Journal of Social Science, 24, pp.109~134 (2020)
- Untact service using companion robot: Year 1, research report, "Seoul Senior Welfare Center Association", Seoul Senior Welfare Center Association, ~ (2021)
- S. Y. Choi, "A Study on AI and IT research trends related to care for the elderly", The 8th International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science 2021, pp.47~ (2021)
- NASW, "Code of ethics" (2021), NASW
- M. Reisch, "Social work ethics : In a changing society" (2021), Cognella
- 박윤영, "커뮤니티케어정책에 따른 ‘장애인･고령자 등 주거약자 지원에 관한 법률’의 개정방안", 인문사회 21, 10(3), pp.415~430 (2019), 인문사회 21[DOI]
- "Community integrative care" (2020)[URL]
- Ministry of Health and Welfare, "Community care guidebook" (2020), Ministry of Health and Welfare
- "Bucheon city to provide customized and integrated care for the elderly" (2019)[URL]
- "Cheonan city community care, introduced AI care robot" (2021)[URL]
- B. Hofmann, "Ethical challenges with welfare technology : A review of the literature", Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, pp.389~406 (2013)[DOI]
- 이상용, "비디오 기반의 독거노인 위급 상황 탐지를 위한 행동 분석", 제어.로봇.시스템학회 논문지, 13(6), pp.537~541 (2007), 제어·로봇·시스템학회
- S. Y. Choi, "A study on AI and IT research trends related to care for the elderly", The 8th International Conference on Electronics, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science 2021, pp.47~ (2021)
- 김수완, "복지기술은 사회 혁신인가: 독거노인을 위한 기술기반 돌봄서비스 사례 연구", 비판사회정책, (71), pp.7~41 (2021), 비판과 대안을 위한 사회복지학회[DOI]
- M. Reisch, "Social work ethics: In a changing society" (2021), Cognella
- B. Hofmann, "Ethical challenges with welfare technology : A review of the literature", Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, pp.389~406 (2013)[DOI]
- M. Cuesta, "Welfare technology, ethics and well-being a qualitative study about the implementation of welfare technology within areas of social services in a Swedish municipality", International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 15, pp.1~12 (2020)[DOI]
- "Intergovernmental Meeting of Experts (Category II) related to a Draft Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence" (2021)[URL]
- "Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI" (2021)[URL]
- "The AI ethics charter of the KAIEA" (2021)[URL]
- "Ministry of Science and Technology Information and Communication Announcement of National Artificial Intelligence Ethics Standard" (2020)[URL]
- J. W. Creswell, "Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approach" (2013), SAGE Publications
- S. Y. Choi, "Case management in social work" (2019), Yangseongwon
- K. D. Kim, "Social work ethics and philosophy" (2015), Yangseowon
- S. Y. Choi, "Community care and AI: what are the ethical considerations?", The 9th International Conference on Electronics, EEESC THAI-KOR 2021 (2021)
- F. G. Reamer, "Ethics and risk management : Online and distance social work" (2021), Cognella
- C. Jordan, "Technology’s promise to elders", Health & Social Work, 41(2), pp.71~73 (2016)[DOI]