성별에 따른 배양육 인지도 및 영향 요인
Korean Consumers’ Awareness of Cultured Meat and Influencing Factors by Gender
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구의 목적은 배양육에 대한 소비자의 인지도 및 이에 영향을 미치는 요인을 성별에 따라 살펴보고자 하는 것이다. 2021년 6월 9일부터 15일까지 온라인 설문조사에 참여한 20세 이상 1,008명의 응답을 분석하였다. 배양육 인지도는 성별에 따라 차이가 있어 남성이 여성보다 높았다. 또 연령대가 낮을수록, 교육 수준이 높을수록, 직업이 학생일 경우 배양육 인지도가 높았다. 배양육 인지도에 영향을 미치는 요인은 전체적으로는 성별, 연령, 직업, 건강에 대한 관심, 환경에 대한 관심, 전통육에 대한 인식, 얼리어답터 성향이었다. 성별에 따라 배양육 인지도에 영향을 미치는 요인은 차이가 있어 남성은 성별, 직업, 건강에 대한 관심, 얼리어답터 성향이, 여성은 연령, 교육 수준, 건강에 대한 관심, 환경에 대한 관심, 전통육에 대한 인식, 얼리어답터 성향이 영향을 미쳤다. 본 연구의 결과는 향후 배양육 연구 개발 및 소비자 정책을 마련하기 위한 기초 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine Korean consumers’ awareness of Cultured Meat(CM) and influencing factors by gender. On-line survey was conducted from June 9 till June 15, 2021. Analyses of 1,008 respondents whose ages were 20 or older resulted in three points. First, Korean consumers’ awareness of CM were lower than the medium in the scale of 1-5, and men reported higher level of awareness than women. Second, the awareness of CM differed by socio-demographic characteristics of participants. The younger, the higher educated, and the students showed higher level of awareness of CM. Third, influencing factors on the awareness of CM differed by gender. In total, gender, age, job, health concern, environmental concern, perceptions of Traditional Meat(TM), and early adopter tendency were significantly associated with the awareness of CM. Among men, age, job, health concern, and early adopter tendency were significant influencing factors on the awareness of CM, where as age, education, health concern, environmental concern, perceptions of TM, and early adopter tendency were so among women. The study results may be used as basic data for developing policies for CM research and consumers.
참고문헌 (30)
- "World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423)" (2019)[URL]
- A. Thavamani, "Meet the Meat Alternatives : The Value of Alternative Protein Sources", Current Nutrition Reports, 9(4), pp.346~355 (2020)[DOI]
- "Alternative Meat. Monthly Report(2021-01) by Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning" (2021)[URL]
- W. Kang, "Study on the Preference of Edible Insects by Age Group", Journal of Animal Assisted Psychotherapy, 6(1), pp.47~56 (2017)[DOI]
- K. Park, "A Study of the Consumer Preference for Insect Products", Doctor, pp.2020
- 허만규, "배양육이란 무엇인가?", 생명과학회지, 31(6), pp.587~594 (2021), 한국생명과학회[DOI]
- IT. Kadim, "Cultured Meat from Muscle Stem Cell : A Review of Challenges and Prospects", Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14, pp.222~233 (2015)[DOI]
- J. Hwang, "Factors Affecting Consumers’ Alternative Meats Buying Intentions : Plant-Based Meat Alternative and Cultured Meat", Sustainability, 12(14), pp.5662~ (2020)[DOI]
- 장민선, "젠더혁신관점에서 새로운 식품의 안전성 평가기준의 필요성에 따른 제도연구", 인문사회 21, 12(2), pp.941~952 (2021), 인문사회 21
- MJ. Post, "Cultured Beef : Medical Technology to Produce Food", Journal of the Science of Food &Agriculture, 94, pp.1039~1041 (2014)[DOI]
- I. Datar, "Possibilities for an In Vitro Meat Production System", Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 11, pp.13~22 (2010)[DOI]
- MJ. Post, "Cultured Meat from Stem Cells : Challenges and Prospects", Meat Science, 92, pp.297~301 (2012)[DOI]
- J. Reiss, "Cell Source for Cultivated Meat : Applications and Considerations throughout the Production Workflow", International Journal of Molecular Science, 22, pp.7513~ (2021)[DOI]
- CE. Jochems, "The Use of Fetal Bovine Serum:Ethical or Scientific Problem?", Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 30(2), pp.219~227 (2002)[DOI]
- SM. Moritz, "Alternatives for Large-Scale Production of Cultured Beef : A Review", Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 14, pp.208~216 (2015)[DOI]
- S. Campuzano, "Scaffolds for 3D Cell Culture and Cellular Agriculture Applications Derived from Non-Animal Source", Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, pp.38~ (2019)[DOI]
- HL. Tuomisto, "Environmental Impacts of Cultured Meat Production", Environmental Science and Technology, 45(14), pp.6117~6123 (2011)[DOI]
- C. Bryant, "Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat : A Systematic Review", Meat Science, 143, pp.8~17 (2018)[DOI]
- C. Bryant, "Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat : An Updated Review(2018–2020)", Applied Sciences, 10(15), pp.5201~ (2020)[DOI]
- S. Chriki, "The Myth of Cultured Meat : A Review", Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, pp.1~9 (2020)[DOI]
- M. C. Mancini, "Exploring Consumers' Attitude towards Cultured Meat in Italy", Meat Science, 150, pp.101~110 (2019)[DOI]
- M. Zhang, "Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat in Urban Areas of Three Cities in China", Food Control, 118, pp.107390~ (2020)[DOI]
- P. Slade, "If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer Preferences for Plant-Based and Cultured Meat Burgers", Appetite, 125, pp.428~437 (2018)[DOI]
- M. Siegrist, "Perceived Naturalness, Disgust, trust and food Neophobia as Predictors of Cultured Meat Acceptance in Ten Countries", Appetite, 155, pp.104814~ (2020)[DOI]
- E. Gravely, "Transitions on the Shopping Floor : Investigating the Role of Canadian Supermarkets in Alternative Protein Consumption", Appetite, 130, pp.146~156 (2018)[DOI]
- C. A. Gómez-Luciano, "Consumers’ Willingness to Purchase Three Alternatives to Meat Proteins in the United Kingdom, Spain, Brazil and the Dominican Republic", Food Quality and Preference, 78, pp.103732~ (2019)[DOI]
- R. Weinrich, "Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat in Germany", Meat Science, 162, pp.107924~ (2020)[DOI]
- 안소현, "대체육 유형에 따른 소비자의 지각된 혜택이 신뢰 및 구매의도에 미치는 영향", 외식경영연구, 23(6), pp.49~75 (2020), 한국외식경영학회[DOI]
- 조아형, "한·중 소비자들의 육류대체식품에 대한 구매의도에 미치는 영향 연구", 한국식생활문화학회지, 35(5), pp.440~449 (2020), 한국식생활문화학회[DOI]
- 석재환, "얼리어답터 성향이 스마트폰 신 모델에 대한 기대감과 구매의도에 미치는 영향", 경영연구, 32(4), pp.295~321 (2017), 한국산업경영학회[DOI]