본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

William Twisse’ theological methodology: Concerning the order of decree and the object of predestination

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper deals with the theological method of William Twisse in his doctrine of divine decree. According to him, the main issues of the doctrine are concerning the order of decree and the object of predestination. Twisse observes that the diversity in perspective on the doctrine even among pious theologians are not caused by theological difference but mainly by a logical or methodological one. Therefore, no marvel if Twisse tried to focus his writings on the matter of theological methodology. His desire to find the more accurate and proper way of discussion in the controversy caused him to fall in love with the School divinity and read more writings of Papists in Rome than those of Divines in England and Europe. He, thus, adapt the scholastic axiom of the inverse rule in intention and execution mainly whereby to testify his supralasarian view on the order of decree and on the object of predestination as human not yet created. Three points this paper makes are what follows: 1) it is impossible for Twisse to divide content and method in that, whereas the latter does not produce the former, the former could be damaged without the proper understanding and application of the latter; 2) Twisse believes that the glory of God, as the only end of all other decrees, should be first in intention, and then all those other decrees of God should be intended for one entire coordinate and complete means conducing to the glory of God, any one decree of them not subordinate any of the others; 3) with regard to the object of predestination as massa nondum condita, Twisse intends to see the meaning of sin in the context of intention and execution. It is in light of these three points that this paper attempts to see Twisse’s view on the object of predestination.

Abstract

This paper deals with the theological method of William Twisse in his doctrine of divine decree. According to him, the main issues of the doctrine are concerning the order of decree and the object of predestination. Twisse observes that the diversity in perspective on the doctrine even among pious theologians are not caused by theological difference but mainly by a logical or methodological one. Therefore, no marvel if Twisse tried to focus his writings on the matter of theological methodology. His desire to find the more accurate and proper way of discussion in the controversy caused him to fall in love with the School divinity and read more writings of Papists in Rome than those of Divines in England and Europe. He, thus, adapt the scholastic axiom of the inverse rule in intention and execution mainly whereby to testify his supralasarian view on the order of decree and on the object of predestination as human not yet created. Three points this paper makes are what follows: 1) it is impossible for Twisse to divide content and method in that, whereas the latter does not produce the former, the former could be damaged without the proper understanding and application of the latter; 2) Twisse believes that the glory of God, as the only end of all other decrees, should be first in intention, and then all those other decrees of God should be intended for one entire coordinate and complete means conducing to the glory of God, any one decree of them not subordinate any of the others; 3) with regard to the object of predestination as massa nondum condita, Twisse intends to see the meaning of sin in the context of intention and execution. It is in light of these three points that this paper attempts to see Twisse’s view on the object of predestination.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Aquinas, Thomas, "Summa Theologiae" (1964)
  2. Arminius, Jacob, "The Writings of James Arminius, vol.III" (1956), Baker Book House
  3. Aristotle, "The Metaphysics" (1933), Harvard University Press
  4. Augustine, "De praedestinatione sanctorum", Patrologia Latina, 44
  5. Baillie, Robert, "The Letters and Journals, vols., I., II" (1841), Bannatyne Club
  6. Barlee, William, "A Necessary Vindication of the Doctrine of Predestination, formerly asserted"
  7. Bell, Michael D., "Propter potestatem, scientiam, ac beneplacitum Dei:the doctrine of the object of predestination in the theology of Johannes Maccovius" (1986), Westminster Theological Seminary
  8. Bradwardine, Thomas, "De cavsa Dei, contra Pelagivm, et de virtvte cavsarvm, ad suos Mertonenses", Officina Nortoniana
  9. Calvin, John, "Calvin’s Calvinism: Treatises on the eternal predestination of God and the secret providence of God" (1987), Reformed Free Publishing Association
  10. Calvin, John, "The Institution of Christian Religion", Reinolde Wolfe &Richarde Harison
  11. Clark, Samuel, "The Lives of sundry Eminent Persons in this Later Age, vol.I", Thomas Simmons
  12. Dijk, K., "De strijd over Infra- en Supralapsarisme in de Gereformeerde Kerken van Nederland" (1912), J.H.Kok
  13. Du Moulin, Pierre, "The Anatomy of Arminianisme: or The Opening of the Controversies lately handled in the Low-Countryes, concerning the Doctrine of Prouidence, of Predestination, of the Death of Christ, of Nature and Grace", T. S
  14. Fesko, J. V, "Diversity within the Reformed tradition: supra-infralapsarianism in Calvin, Dort, and Westminster" (1999), University of Aberdeen
  15. Heppe, Heinlich, "Die Dogmatik der evangelisch-reformierten Kirche. Neu durchgesehen und herausgegeben von Ernst Bizer" (1935), Moers
  16. Hoard, Samuel, "Gods Love to Mankind manifested, by disprooving his Absoluted Decree for their Damnation", ~
  17. Hutton, Sarah, "Thomas Jackson, Oxford Platonist, and William Twisse, Aristotelian", Journal of the History of Ideas, 39(4), pp.635~652 (1978)
  18. 김지훈, "테오도레 베자(Theodore Beza, 1519-1605)의 신학 안에서 예정론에 대한 이해", 조직신학연구, 24, pp.36~64 (2016), 한국복음주의조직신학회
  19. 이은선, "프란시스 튜레틴(Francis Turretin)의 예정론 연구", 한국개혁신학, 46, pp.33~59 (2015), 한국개혁신학회
  20. Leff, Gordon, "Bradwardine and the Pelagians: A Study of his ‘De causa Dei’ and its opponents" (1957), The Syndics of the Cambridge University Press
  21. Mede, Joseph, "The Works of the pious and profoundly-learned Joseph Mede", James Flesher
  22. Muller, Richard A., "Vera Philosophia cum sacra Theologia unsquam pugnat: Keckermann on Philosophy, Theology, and the Problem of Double Truth", Sixteenth Century Journal, 15(3), pp.341~365 (1984)
  23. Muller, Richard A, "Dictionary of Latin and Greek Theological Terms: Drawn principally from Protestant Scholastic Theology" (1985), Baker Book House
  24. Nichols, James, "Calvinism and Arminianism compared in their Principles and Tendency or the Doctrines of General Redemption" (1824), Longman
  25. Pierce, Thomas, "Autokatakrisis, or Self-condemnation, exemplified in Mr. Whitfield, Mr. Barlee, and Mr. Hickman, with occasional reflextions on Calvin, Mr Beza, Mr Zuinglius, Mr Piscator, Mr Rivet, and Mr Rollock: but more especially on Doctor Twisse, and Master Hobbs", J.G, ~
  26. Pierce, Thomas, "The Divine Philanthropie Defended … in Vindication of some Notes concerning God’s Decrees, especially of Reprobation", Richard Royston
  27. Ra, Eun Sung, "Arminius’ Doctrine of Predestination", Shinhakjinam, 83(2), pp.227~264 (2016)
  28. Storms, Sam, "Chosen for life: The Case for Divine Election" (2007), Crossway Books
  29. Trueman, Carl R, "Reformation and Scholasticism", pp.253~275 (2001), Baker Academic
  30. Turretin, Francis, "Institutes of elenctic Theology, vol. I" (1992), P&R
  31. Twisse, William, "A Treatise of Mr. Cottons Clearing Certaine Doubts concerning Predestination together with an Examination thereof", F. D
  32. Twisse, William, "Ad Jacobi Arminii Collationem cum Francisco Junio; &Johan. Arnoldi Corvini Defensionem sententiae Arminianae, de praedestinatione, gratia, &libero arbitrio, &c. Quam Adversus Danielis Tileni Considerationem edidit, Animadversiones", Johannes Janssonius
  33. Twisse, William, "Dissertatio de scientia media", Jacobum à Biesium
  34. Twisse, William, "The Doctrine of the Synod of Dort and Arles", s. n
  35. Twisse, William, "The Riches of Gods Love unto the Vessells of Mercy, consistent with His Absolute Hatred or Reprbation of the Vessells of Wrath, or an Answer unto a book entiuled Gods Love unto Mankind, Manifested by Disproving His Absolute Decree for their Damnation", L.L. and H.H. Printers
  36. Twisse, William, "Vindiciae gratiae, potestatis, ac providentiae Dei hoc est, ad examen libelli Perkinsiani de praedestinatione modo et ordine, institutum a J. Arminio, responsio scholastic"
  37. Walton, Izaak, "The Life of Dr. Sanderson, late Bishop of Lincoln"

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)