Revelation or Reason? The Different Perspectives on Church Polity Between Thomas Cartwright and Richard Hooker
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research challenges to Analyze the difference of church government between Presbyterian and Anglican in the eras of Tudor and Stuarts in England by research on Thomas Cartwright and Richard Hooker. The prime point of difference between Presbyterianism and Anglicanism was that Presbyterian conceived that the Scriptures revealed a model for church organization and for all human behavior, whereas Anglican understood the Scriptures as an authority for all things pertaining to redemption, but composed of many natural law. In particular, the architect of Anglican, Hooker regarded the form of the church as a matter beyond salvation's jurisdiction, and hence liable to considerations of expediency, so that experience and convenience were the appropriate yardsticks for a viable form of church government. Besides, one of the discrepancies between Cartwright and Hooker was in the understanding of human nature such as reason. Anglican understood that reason provided a way to define God's will. On this basis, Hooker was able to argue forcibly for the complete complementarity and interdependence of reason and Scripture, But Cartwright insisted that the total depravity of humanity was far more complete and thoroughgoing so that every faculty was deficient.
Abstract
This research challenges to Analyze the difference of church government between Presbyterian and Anglican in the eras of Tudor and Stuarts in England by research on Thomas Cartwright and Richard Hooker. The prime point of difference between Presbyterianism and Anglicanism was that Presbyterian conceived that the Scriptures revealed a model for church organization and for all human behavior, whereas Anglican understood the Scriptures as an authority for all things pertaining to redemption, but composed of many natural law. In particular, the architect of Anglican, Hooker regarded the form of the church as a matter beyond salvation's jurisdiction, and hence liable to considerations of expediency, so that experience and convenience were the appropriate yardsticks for a viable form of church government. Besides, one of the discrepancies between Cartwright and Hooker was in the understanding of human nature such as reason. Anglican understood that reason provided a way to define God's will. On this basis, Hooker was able to argue forcibly for the complete complementarity and interdependence of reason and Scripture, But Cartwright insisted that the total depravity of humanity was far more complete and thoroughgoing so that every faculty was deficient.
참고문헌 (40)
- Abrahamse, J. M, "Robert Browne as an Unwanted Child: Explaining Separatism from the Nursery of Presbyterian Puritanism", Perspectives in Religious Studies, 40(4) (2013), Baylor University Press
- Almasy, R., "The Purpose of Richard Hooker’s polemic", Journal of the History of Ideas, 39(2) (1978), University of Pennsylvania Press
- Almasy, R, "Restitution or Reformation? Cartwright and Hooker on the Elizabethan Church", Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church (1977), Historical Society of the Episcopal Church
- Aquinas, T., "Summa Theologiae" (1965), Cambridge University Press
- Atta-Baffoe, V., "A Study of Richard Hooker's Theology of Participation and the Principle of Anglican Ecclesiology", M.A., pp.1993
- Booty, J., "The Spirit of Anglicanism" (1979), Morehouse-Barlow
- Bunting, I, "Celebrating the Anglican Way" (1996), Hodder & Stoughton
- Calvin, J., "Institutes of the Christian Religio, in two volumes" (1967), the Westminster Press
- Cartwright, T, "The Rest of the Second Replie of Thomas Cartwright : against Master Doctor Vuhitgifts second ansvuer, touching the Church discipline(sic)", Imprinted by Thomas Guarinus
- Cartwright, T, "The Second Replie of Thomas Cartwright : agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes Second Answer touching the Churche Discipline", Imprinted by Michael Schirat
- Casserly, J. V. C, "The Christian in Philosophy" (1949), Faber and Faber
- Cook, P, "The Church", Anglican and Puritan Thinking, The Westminster Conference (1977)
- Chadwick, H., "Theology in Anglicanism" (1984), Morehouse-Barlow, Wilton CT
- Davies, H, "Worship and Theology in England, From Cranmer to Baxter and Fox, 1534‐1690" (1996), William B. Edermans Publishing
- Frere, W. H., "Puritan Manifestoes : A Study of the Origin of the Puritan Revolt" (1907), Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge
- Grosart, A. B, "A Commentary upon the Epistle of St. Paul written to the Colossians-- by Thomas Cartwright" (1910), Macmillan
- Hensley, H, "Puritanism in England" (1972), Burt Franklin
- Hooker, R., "The Works of that Learned and Judicious Divine, Richard Hooker, With an Account of His Life and Death by Issac Walton" (1888), Clarendon Press
- Hulbert, E, "The English Reformation and Puritanism" (1908), The University of Chicago Press
- Hunt, J, "Religious Thought in England" (1870), Strahan & Co. Publishers
- Ingalls, R, "Richard Hooker as Interpreter of the Reformed Doctrine of Sola Scriptura", Anglican and Episcopal History, 77(4) (2008), Historical Society of the Episcopal Church
- Lake, P., "Moderate Puritans and the Elizabethan Church" (1982), CUP
- Luoma, J., "The Primitive Church as a Normative Principle in the Theology of the Sixteenth Century: The Anglican-Puritan Debate over Church Polity as Represented by Richard Hooker and Thomas Cartwright", Ph. D., pp.1974
- McAdoo, H., "The Spirit of Anglicanism: A Survey of Anglican Theological Method in the Seventeenth Century" (1965), Black
- McGrath, A, "The Renewal of Anglicanism" (1993), SPCK
- Neal, D., "Neal’s History of the Puritans or the Rise, Principles, and Sufferings of the Protestant Dissenters, to the Glorious Aera of the Revolution" (1811), Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown
- New, J, "The Whitgift-Cartwright Controversy" (1968), Archiv fur Reformationsgeschichte
- New, J, "Anglican and Puritan, The Basis of their Opposition 1558-1640" (1964), Adam & Charles Black
- Perrott, M. E. C, "Richard Hooker and the Problem of Authority in the Elizabethan Church", Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 49(1) (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Routh, C, "Who’s Who in History, England 1484-1603 Vol. 2" (1964), Basil Blackwell
- Secor, P, "Richard Hooker on Anglican Faith and Worship-of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity : Book V" (2003), Spck
- Strype, J, "The Life and Acts of Matthew Parker" (1820), Clarendon Press
- Stevenson, K., "The Identity of Anglican Worship" (1991), Mowbray
- Sykes, S., "The Study of Anglicanism" (1986), Fortress Press
- Thompson, C., "Studies in Richard Hooker" (1972), Case Western Reserve University Press
- Usher, R, "The Reconstruction of the English Church" (1919), D. Appleton and Company
- Vogel, A.A., "Theology in Anglicanism. Morehouse-Barlow" (1984), Wilton CT
- Walton, I, "The Works of Richard Hooker with the Account of His Life and Death" (1854), D. Appleton and Company
- Whitgift, J., "The Works of John Whitgift, vol. I-III"
