본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Revelation or Reason? The Different Perspectives on Church Polity Between Thomas Cartwright and Richard Hooker

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This research challenges to Analyze the difference of church government between Presbyterian and Anglican in the eras of Tudor and Stuarts in England by research on Thomas Cartwright and Richard Hooker. The prime point of difference between Presbyterianism and Anglicanism was that Presbyterian conceived that the Scriptures revealed a model for church organization and for all human behavior, whereas Anglican understood the Scriptures as an authority for all things pertaining to redemption, but composed of many natural law. In particular, the architect of Anglican, Hooker regarded the form of the church as a matter beyond salvation's jurisdiction, and hence liable to considerations of expediency, so that experience and convenience were the appropriate yardsticks for a viable form of church government. Besides, one of the discrepancies between Cartwright and Hooker was in the understanding of human nature such as reason. Anglican understood that reason provided a way to define God's will. On this basis, Hooker was able to argue forcibly for the complete complementarity and interdependence of reason and Scripture, But Cartwright insisted that the total depravity of humanity was far more complete and thoroughgoing so that every faculty was deficient.

Abstract

This research challenges to Analyze the difference of church government between Presbyterian and Anglican in the eras of Tudor and Stuarts in England by research on Thomas Cartwright and Richard Hooker. The prime point of difference between Presbyterianism and Anglicanism was that Presbyterian conceived that the Scriptures revealed a model for church organization and for all human behavior, whereas Anglican understood the Scriptures as an authority for all things pertaining to redemption, but composed of many natural law. In particular, the architect of Anglican, Hooker regarded the form of the church as a matter beyond salvation's jurisdiction, and hence liable to considerations of expediency, so that experience and convenience were the appropriate yardsticks for a viable form of church government. Besides, one of the discrepancies between Cartwright and Hooker was in the understanding of human nature such as reason. Anglican understood that reason provided a way to define God's will. On this basis, Hooker was able to argue forcibly for the complete complementarity and interdependence of reason and Scripture, But Cartwright insisted that the total depravity of humanity was far more complete and thoroughgoing so that every faculty was deficient.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Abrahamse, J. M, "Robert Browne as an Unwanted Child: Explaining Separatism from the Nursery of Presbyterian Puritanism", Perspectives in Religious Studies, 40(4) (2013), Baylor University Press
  2. Almasy, R., "The Purpose of Richard Hooker’s polemic", Journal of the History of Ideas, 39(2) (1978), University of Pennsylvania Press
  3. Almasy, R, "Restitution or Reformation? Cartwright and Hooker on the Elizabethan Church", Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church (1977), Historical Society of the Episcopal Church
  4. Aquinas, T., "Summa Theologiae" (1965), Cambridge University Press
  5. Atta-Baffoe, V., "A Study of Richard Hooker's Theology of Participation and the Principle of Anglican Ecclesiology", M.A., pp.1993
  6. Booty, J., "The Spirit of Anglicanism" (1979), Morehouse-Barlow
  7. Bunting, I, "Celebrating the Anglican Way" (1996), Hodder & Stoughton
  8. Calvin, J., "Institutes of the Christian Religio, in two volumes" (1967), the Westminster Press
  9. Cartwright, T, "The Rest of the Second Replie of Thomas Cartwright : against Master Doctor Vuhitgifts second ansvuer, touching the Church discipline(sic)", Imprinted by Thomas Guarinus
  10. Cartwright, T, "The Second Replie of Thomas Cartwright : agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes Second Answer touching the Churche Discipline", Imprinted by Michael Schirat
  11. Casserly, J. V. C, "The Christian in Philosophy" (1949), Faber and Faber
  12. Cook, P, "The Church", Anglican and Puritan Thinking, The Westminster Conference (1977)
  13. Chadwick, H., "Theology in Anglicanism" (1984), Morehouse-Barlow, Wilton CT
  14. Davies, H, "Worship and Theology in England, From Cranmer to Baxter and Fox, 1534‐1690" (1996), William B. Edermans Publishing
  15. Frere, W. H., "Puritan Manifestoes : A Study of the Origin of the Puritan Revolt" (1907), Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge
  16. Grosart, A. B, "A Commentary upon the Epistle of St. Paul written to the Colossians-- by Thomas Cartwright" (1910), Macmillan
  17. Hensley, H, "Puritanism in England" (1972), Burt Franklin
  18. Hooker, R., "The Works of that Learned and Judicious Divine, Richard Hooker, With an Account of His Life and Death by Issac Walton" (1888), Clarendon Press
  19. Hulbert, E, "The English Reformation and Puritanism" (1908), The University of Chicago Press
  20. Hunt, J, "Religious Thought in England" (1870), Strahan & Co. Publishers
  21. Ingalls, R, "Richard Hooker as Interpreter of the Reformed Doctrine of Sola Scriptura", Anglican and Episcopal History, 77(4) (2008), Historical Society of the Episcopal Church
  22. Lake, P., "Moderate Puritans and the Elizabethan Church" (1982), CUP
  23. Luoma, J., "The Primitive Church as a Normative Principle in the Theology of the Sixteenth Century: The Anglican-Puritan Debate over Church Polity as Represented by Richard Hooker and Thomas Cartwright", Ph. D., pp.1974
  24. McAdoo, H., "The Spirit of Anglicanism: A Survey of Anglican Theological Method in the Seventeenth Century" (1965), Black
  25. McGrath, A, "The Renewal of Anglicanism" (1993), SPCK
  26. Neal, D., "Neal’s History of the Puritans or the Rise, Principles, and Sufferings of the Protestant Dissenters, to the Glorious Aera of the Revolution" (1811), Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme and Brown
  27. New, J, "The Whitgift-Cartwright Controversy" (1968), Archiv fur Reformationsgeschichte
  28. New, J, "Anglican and Puritan, The Basis of their Opposition 1558-1640" (1964), Adam & Charles Black
  29. Perrott, M. E. C, "Richard Hooker and the Problem of Authority in the Elizabethan Church", Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 49(1) (1998), Cambridge University Press
  30. Routh, C, "Who’s Who in History, England 1484-1603 Vol. 2" (1964), Basil Blackwell
  31. Secor, P, "Richard Hooker on Anglican Faith and Worship-of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity : Book V" (2003), Spck
  32. Strype, J, "The Life and Acts of Matthew Parker" (1820), Clarendon Press
  33. Stevenson, K., "The Identity of Anglican Worship" (1991), Mowbray
  34. Sykes, S., "The Study of Anglicanism" (1986), Fortress Press
  35. Thompson, C., "Studies in Richard Hooker" (1972), Case Western Reserve University Press
  36. Usher, R, "The Reconstruction of the English Church" (1919), D. Appleton and Company
  37. Vogel, A.A., "Theology in Anglicanism. Morehouse-Barlow" (1984), Wilton CT
  38. Walton, I, "The Works of Richard Hooker with the Account of His Life and Death" (1854), D. Appleton and Company
  39. Whitgift, J., "The Works of John Whitgift, vol. I-III"

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)